Not again! (And Again)

Since the following Jerome Gambit game* (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) is identical to one that I played less than two weeks ago (see "(This time I saw it)"), I'm tempted to just copy the annotations from that game, or simply give a link to perrypawnpusher - thinan, blitz FICS, 2010.

Instead, I'll add a few diagrams, make a few references to the "Jerome Gamble" – How much of any of the refutations does my opponent actually know?? – and then let you get on your way.

perrypawnpusher  - javistas
blitz FICS, 2010

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ke6

7.Qf5+ Kd6 8.f4 Qh4+

9.g3 Nf3+

10.Kd1 Qe7

11.Qd5 checkmate

(*Two weeks after I originally composed this post, I played the identical game perrypawnpusher - fortytwooz, blitz, FICS, 2010. When I thanked my opponent afterwards for the game, he cheerfully responded with a simple "lol". That's my third example of what might be called "The Buyer's Regret Variation.")