Monday, February 27, 2023

M.Carlsen, R.Fischer, Early Mistakes & The New View (Part 1)

 M.Carlsen, R.Fischer, Early Mistakes & The New View (Part 1)   

  

(by Yury V. Bukayev) 

 

 

My new analytical research includes the comparison of three very important games (2020, 2023 and 1964). 

  

Almost three years ago the World Champion Top GM Magnus Carlsen (as White) has played a very weak game against Top GM Ian Nepomniachtchi (the tournament Magnus Carlsen Invitational, rapid, 2020): 

 

1.e4          c5  

2.Nf3        d6  

3.d4          cxd4 

4.Nxd4      Nf6 

5.Bc4?!     Nxe4 

6.Qh5       e6 

7.Nxe6?    Bxe6 

8.Bxe6      Qe7 

9.Bxf7+?  Qxf7 

10.Qe2      Qe7   , 

 

where Black got an enormous advantage and won in 28 moves, although White’s position didn’t permit to fight seriously on the grandmaster level after White’s 9th move already, in my opinion.  

 

It is interesting that the possible 10.Qxf7?! (it plays no role how to play here: Black must win rapidly and easily in any case) 10…Kxf7 leads to the position which is enough similar to the Jerome gambit with exchanged Queens. Thus, the Bishop on c4 and the King’s Knight were sacrificed for Black’s pawns f7 and “e” and for Black’s minor piece. The Knight’s way Ng8-f6xe4 before Bxf7+ is similar to some new systems of the Jerome gambit – look, please, at my analytical researchLose Never with a Strong Deferred Jerome Gambit (Part 3) (2023). 

 

Recently the Russian chess author Valery P. Golshev has told me, without analyses or appraisals, about the existence of this M.Carlsen’s game. After that I made a look at this game and said him that 9.Bxf7+ isn’t a good move and that M.Carlsen could try (!) to save his rapid game with 9.0-0! instead. And Mr. Golshev (his nickname on Lichess.org is WaleraG) suggested me to play this mistaken variation against him with a rapid time control. I have accepted his challenge. Thus, here is our recent game.  

 

Yury_V_BukayevWaleraG 

 

10+0 tempo 

 

B57, Carlsen Variation thematic game, 

 

Lichess.org, 2023 

 

1.e4        c 

2.Nf3      d 

3.d4        cxd4 

4.Nxd4   Nf6 

5.Bc4     Nxe4 

6.Qh5     e6 

7.Nxe6   Bxe6 

8.Bxe6    Qe7 

9.0-0!     Qxe6 

10.Re1    d5 

11.Nc3!  Nc6 

12.f3       Bc5+ 

13.Kf1    Bb4 

14.fxe4   Bxc3 

15.bxc3   dxe4 

16.Qe2    f5 

17.Qb5    0-0-0 

18.Rb1    Rd7 

19.Bf4    Qf6 

20.Red1  Rxd1+ 

21.Rxd1  Rd8 

22.Rxd8  Nxd8 

23.Qc5+  Nc6 

24.Qd5    Qf8 

25.Qe6+  Kd8 

26.Bg5+  Kc7 

27.Bf4+   Kd8 

28.Bg5+  Kc7 

29.Bf4+   Kd8 

        ½ - ½  

 

It is clear, Valery Golshev’s play was strong: he has made some inaccurate moves only including the last of them – 24…Qf8?! – when he has had a serious lack of time. My new attack has been played here, and it has brought the result.  

 

Comparing to it, I.Nepomniachtchi has had much better situation in his above game: his advantage was much more, the time control (15+10) was more large. But even these conditions couldn’t prevent his further mistakes in his above game. That is why, I’m sure, M.Carlsen has had an absolutely real practical chance to fight after the possible move 9.0-0!.  

 

It is very valuable to compare this M.CarlsenI.Nepomniachtchi game with the game Richard LunenfeldTop GM Robert J. Fischer (the simultaneous exhibition, USA, 1964), where 9.0-0! has been played in a very similar situation, and we get the same position. I’d like to add my commentaries to the beginning of this game.  

 

1.e4        c5  

2.Nf3      d6  

3.d4        cxd4 

4.Nxd4   Nf6 

5.Bc4?!  Nxe4 

6.Qh5     e6 

7.Bxe6Bxe6 

8.Nxe6   Qe7 

9.0-0!     Qxe6 

10.Re1   Be7? [10…d5! with Black’s advantage]  

11.Qb5+ Qd7?! [11…Kf8!! 12.f3 a6! 13.Qf1 d5 14.fxe4 d4! = ]  

12.Qxd7+ [with White’s advantage]. 

 

Due to White’s further mistakes Black won, but this game shows that under conditions of a simultaneous exhibition the very strong grandmaster (Black) can make serious mistakes rapidly, so White can get an advantage here 

 

 

 Contact the author:  istinayubukayev@yandex.ru  

 

© 2023 Yury V. Bukayev (Copyright © Bukayev Yury Vyacheslavovich 2023). All rights reserved.  

[A legal using of this investigation with a reference to it is permitted  

and doesn’t require author’s consent.] 

    

No comments:

Post a Comment