Every once in a while, while playing the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) White meets a defender who believes that copying a move or a strategem is the proper way to go. This usually involves a return sacrifice at f2, after White has sacrificed at f7.
The following game raises questions about the wisdom of such a strategy.
Wall, Bill - Guest1915145
Internet, 2021
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+
Declining the gambit, a rare move.
5.Bc4 Bxf2+
Another example of If you can do it to me, I can do it to you.
White captured a pawn and bumped Black's King; Black now captures a pawn and bumps White's King.
Oh, wait - Black declined to capture the Bishop. That means...
6.Kxf2
After six moves, White is up a piece, which is something rare in a Jerome Gambit.
6...d6 7.Nc3 Nf6 8.Rf1 Bg4 9.Kg1
White castles-by-hand, usually a recommendation for Black in the Jerome Gambit accepted.
9...Na5 10.Be2 Bxf3 11.Rxf3 h6
Feeling pressure on his Knight along the f-file, Black prevents additional pressure along the d8-h4 diagonal.
12.Nd5 c6 13.Nxf6 gxf6 14.d4
Don't worry, Bill hasn't missed b2-b4.
14... Rh7 15.dxe5 dxe5 16.Qxd8+ Rxd8 17.b4 Black resigned
Like I said...
Black will be down two pieces, and doubling Rooks on the d-file is not sufficient compensation.
No comments:
Post a Comment