Friday, February 1, 2019

Jerome Gambit: Seriously?

I just received my latest batch of Jerome Gambit games from Bill Wall, which includes the following miniature, a reminder that chess is often played for fun, and not always taken seriously.

Wall, Bill - Guest963500
PlayChess.com, 2019

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ 



4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ 



Wow. Bill forsakes his favorite 6.d4.

6...Ng6 7.Qxc5

And, now he bypasses the "nudge", 7.Qd5+.

7...b6

Perhaps expecting 8.Qe3 Bb7.

8.Qd5+ Kf8 9.Qxa8 Black resigned



Readers, please do not snicker.

Recall the quickie Sicilian Wing Gambit game: Shirazi - Peters, Berkeley, 1984: 1.e4 c5 2.b4 cxb4 3.a3 d5 4.exd5 Qxd5 5.axb4 Qe5+ White resigned.

Also: from the final position, above, another game in The Database continued to move 20, when White resigned


Wednesday, January 30, 2019

Sit At the Side of the Road and Applaud

Here is the latest Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit game from Angel CamiƱa, playing 1-minute (no increment) chess at lichess.org. 

I have no idea how people do that - especially, successfully. I just have to sit at the side of the road and applaud.

angelcamina - aryopg
1 0 bullet game, lichess.org, 2019

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Nc3 Bc5 5.Bxf7+ 



The Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit.

5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.d4 Neg4 



Posting the Knight aggressively, anticipating that White will castle Kingside.

The Database shows 7 previous games with this position, with White scoring 4-3-0

8.dxc5 Qe7 9.O-O Re8 10.f3



Protecting the e-pawn and kicking the Knight at g4, but 10.h3 was a safer way to do the latter.

10...Ne5 11.Bg5 Qxc5+ 12.Kh1 Nxf3 



Hoping to pick up the White piece at g5, but Angel has seen further.

13.Bxf6 gxf6 14.Qxf3 Re6 



Material is even, but White's development is better, and Black's King is very unsafe.

15.Qh5+ 

It's not an error if your opponent doesn't punish it.

15...Ke7 16.Qxh7+ Ke8 17.Qh8+ Qf8 18.Qxf8+ Kxf8


White has eased off his attack by exchanging Queens, but he still has the better game - and, with the clock ticking, the easier one to play, too. In fact, Black quickly falls into a mating net.

19.Rae1 d6 20.Nd5 Rb8 21.Nxf6 Ke7 22.Nd5+ Kd7 23.Rf7+ Kc6 24.Rxc7+ Kb5 25. Nc3+ Kb6 26.Nd5+ Kb5 27.Re3 Black lost on time 

Monday, January 28, 2019

Jerome Gambit: Puzzles and Mysteries (Part 5)

Before I began this blog, much of my investigation into the Jerome Gambit appeared online in the "Puzzles and Mysteries" section of Edward Winter's The Chess History Information and Research Center. Although it highlighted my mis-steps almost as often as my true discoveries, it provided valuable exposure to my quest, and put me in touch with a number of helpful sources, for which I remain expecially thankful to Mr. Winter.

With the help of the online Wayback Machine, I was able to bring much of this information forward. It adds to my earlier series of posts containing my longer Jerome Gambit article.


I don't know whether you are just looking for the origins of this gambit, but here's some more modern information.
It is mentioned in a footnote as being "unsound" in Gerald Abrahams' book The Chess Mind, originally published in 1951. I can't find my copy, or I'd be more specific.
It is still played occasionally in serious chess - if not at a very high level! I won a game with 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. Bxf7 ch Kxf7 5. Nxe5 Nxe5 6. Qh5ch Ng6 7. Qxc5 d6 8. Qc3 etc This was played in the Birmingham (England) League Division 4 on 5th September 2000.
Peter Banks, 21.05.03

Abrahams' The Chess Mind refers to the line 1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Bc5 3.Bxf7+ as the once popular Jerome Gambit.
I have never seen that line before, having come to the Jerome as a variant of the Giuoco Piano - 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+.  I wonder if others are familiar with it?
It is not mentioned in Gary Lane's Winning with the Bishop's Opening (1993), and although Tim Harding mentions some main lines in his remarkable Bishop's Opening (1973), as well as "other rare of absurd moves," he does not touch on 3.Bxf7+.
Rick Kennedy, 04.06.03

Elliott Fletcher, in his enjoyable Gambits Accepted (1954), covers the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) and follows in Abraham's (The Chess Mind, 1951) footsteps when he writes "Some authors have called the opening with the moves 1.P-K4, P-K4; 2.B-B4, B-B4; 3.BxPch, by the name Jerome."

Other than Abrahams - who may simply have been a victim of a typesetting error (see earlier entry) - has anyone else beside Fletcher mentioned this line in the Bishop's Opening, or attributed it to Jerome?
Rick Kennedy, 02.10.03

Probably the best-known example of the Jerome Gambit is Amateur - Blackburne, London, 1880
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ g6 7.Qxe5 d6 8.Qxh8 Qh4 9.0-0 Nf6 10.c3 Ng4 11.h3 Bxf2+ 12.Kh1 Bf5 13.Qxa8 Qxh3+ 14.gxh3 Bxe4# 0-1. This is how the game appeared in Mr. Blackburne's Games at Chess(1899). To the best of my knowledge, the game was not published earlier than that.

The first player in the game has also sometimes been referred to as "NN" or "Anonymous" or "Stranger." Occasionally (e.g. 
www.superajedrez.com; or, with the wrong year, at www.chesslab.com ) the player has been given as "Millner," although I have not been able to find out why. At least once the player was erroneously referred to as "Jerome" - by Eric Schiller, Unorthodox Chess Openings (1988, 2002) .

Poring through some chess databases, I recently found that same game has been attributed to Halpern,J - Von Scheve,TEngland, 1880.

In addition, a very similar game, varying only at White's move 10, was Amateur - Neumann Guestav R L, London ENG, 1880:

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ g6 7.Qxe5 d6 8.Qxh8 Qh4 9.0-0 Nf6 10.b3 Ng4 11.h3 Bxf2+ 12.Kh1 Bf5 13.Qxa8 Qxh3+ 14.gxh3
Bxe4# 0-1

This raises a few questions (apart from the accuracy of computer databases, of course):
Did Blackburne's game pre-date Halpern - Von Scheve and Amateur - Neumann?
If not, whose game came first?
If so, were the latter games similar by coincidence, by imitation of Blackburne (and, if so, how did Von Scheve and Neumann come to know the line?), or by a common (with Blackburne) previous source?

Any information readers might have on "Halpern,J  Von Scheve,TEngland, 1880" and "Amateur - Neumann Gustav R L, London ENG, 1880" would be enlightening and greatly appreciated!
Rick Kennedy, 02.03.04

I've always trusted The Black Death's memory when he reported in Mr. Blackburne's Games At Chess (1899) that the Amateur - Blackburne game which crushed the Jerome Gambit occurred "about 1880."

Recently, though, I found the game reported in the August 15, 1885 issue of the Brooklyn Chess Chronicle, with the note "played some months ago in London."

Well, you play thousands of games in your life - match, tournament, casual, blindfold, simultaneous - and you're allowed to mis-remember a few!
Rick Kennedy, 30.04.04

As you  can see, some Jerome Gambit mysteries remain!