Over/Under

I have to wonder exactly what an OverwiseMan would think about playing against an under-wise chess opening like the Jerome Gambit...


perrypawnpusher - OverwiseMan
blitz, FICS, 2010

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6

Earlier my opponent had tried 6...Ke6 against me in perrypawnpusher - OverwiseMan, blitz, FICS, 2010.

7.Qd5+ Ke8 8.Qxc5 d6 9.Qe3 Be6

Or 9...N8e7 as in perrypawnpusher - OverwiseMan, blitz, FICS, 2010.

10.0-0 Qf6

11.f4 Nh4

"Out of the frying pan and into the fire."

Instead, Wall,B - Parsom, Chess.com, 2010, continued 11...N6e7 12.d4 Bc4 13.Re1 Kd7 14.Na3 Ba6 15.b4 b6 16.c4 Re8 17.e5 dxe5 18.dxe5 Qe6 19.Qf3 Bxc4 20.Nxc4 Qxc4 21.e6+ Kd6 22.Bb2 Nc6 23.Rad1+ Ke7 24.Rd7+ Kf8 25.Bxg7 checkmate 

12.f5 Bd7 13.g3 Bxf5

Giving back the sacrificed piece seems like a reasonable idea, but Black should use the stranded Knight for that purpose, not the Bishop. Now he loses both.

14.exf5+ Kd7 15.gxh4 Re8

16.Qf4 g5 17.hxg5 Qe7 18.Nc3 h6 19.f6 Nxf6

Hoping that the opened line against White's King will give him counterplay.

20.gxf6 Rhg8+ 21.Kh1 Qe1

Black's idea: now if 22.Rxe1? Rxe1+ 23.Qf1 Rxf1 checkmate!

22.f7 Rg4 23.fxe8Q+ Kxe8 24.Rxe1+ Black resigned

Ashcan Man

Tom Purser, a Blackmar Diemer Gambit player, writer, resource and oracle, has travelled a bit further afield to provide further information on John E. Ishkan, proponent of the "Ashcan Opening" (see "A New Opening?" and "The Ashcan Opening") otherwise known as the Jerome Gambit.

Connecticut Death Index, 1949-2001 about John E Ishkan

Name: John E Ishkan
Father's Surname: Ishkan
Death Date: 30 Oct 1984
Death Place: Bridgeport, Connecticut
Age: 60 Years
Birth Place: Connecticut
Birth Date: 12 Aug 1924
Marital Status: Never Married (Single)
State File #: 21079
Occupation: FOOD SERVICES
Industry: HALLBROOKE HOSPITAL
Residence : Fairfield, Connecticut
Address: 498 Knapps Hwy 06430
Race: White


Tom's comment was "I don't know why they don't include USCF ratings in these things."

The Ashcan Opening

Following up on the information in yesterday's post (see "A New Opening?") Bill Wall adds further information on the chessplayer Jon Ishkan, mentioned in the Precita Valley Chess Herald as playing the opening we now know as the Jerome Gambit...

 The crosstable of the 1958 US Open lists player #119 as John E. Ishkan. His score was

loss #40 Boris Garfinkel
loss #59 Dale Ruth
win #126 H.E. Rock
win #61 E. Aronson
loss #133 Ted Bullockus
loss #76 Walter Grombacjer
loss #97 A.W. Burger
win #130 Ralph G. Houghton
loss #108 R. Hochalter
win #128 Paul Wagner
loss #69 W.H. Donnelly
loss #102 Donald R. Seifert

Since Ishkan beat Rock, Aronsen, Houghton and Wagner, at least one of those games featured the Jerome Gambit.

Additionally:

John E. Ishkan played in the 1955 US Open in Long Beach.

John E. Ishkan played in the 1957 US Open in Cleveland. He was #140, scoring 4.5 points.

According to the May 20, 1956 USCF rating list in Chess Life magazine, Ishkan lived in Fairfield, Connecticut and was rated 1731.

A New Opening?

Jerome Gambit Gemeinde member, chess opening maven and book author Bill Wall sent me a copy of the September 1958 issue of the Precita Valley Chess Herald ("A Monthly Chess News Bulletin Published by the Precita Valley Chess Club Representing The San Francisco Bay Area Chess League") which had an interesting article. 

A New Opening?

During the U.S. Open at Rochester, Minnesota, there was a small tourney taking place on the side. In it was one man named John Ishkan, who, during one round as White, played 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ After White's fifth move his opponent went up to George Koltanowski and asked, "What opening is this?". Kolty said that he did not know but that he would feed the moves to the IBM machine and find out. A little later the player of the Black pieces asked George, "Did the machine have the answer?" "Yes," was the reply, "It's the ASHCAN OPENING!" -- To complete the story, by the way, Ishkan won the game!

A few comments:

The July 1958 cover story of Chess Review was on "A Chess Playing Program for the I.B.M. 704" by Alex Bernstein. This is likely the "IBM machine" that George Koltanowski was joking about consulting with.

I was surprised that Kolty was unfamiliar with the Jerome Gambit, but there was little written about it in the 1950s (I can think only of L. Elliott Fletcher's 1954 Gambit's Accepted that had a game and analysis), certainly nothing in the recently released (1957) Modern Chess Openings, 9th Edition.

My files show a Koltanowski game from a 1953 blindfold simultaneous display in Brussels, which, while a Philidor Defense, has abit of a Jerome touch to it:

Koltanowski,G - NN
blind simul Brussels, 1953

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 Nd7 4.Bc4 h6 5.dxe5 dxe5 6.Bxf7+ Kxf7 7.Nxe5+ Kf6 8.Qd5 Ne7 9.Qf7+ Kxe5 10.Bf4+ Kd4 11.Na3 b5 12.Qe6 Kc5 13.Be3+ Kb4 14.Qb3+ Ka5 15.Qxb5 checkmate

It is interesting to note that the same opening line appeared in a game between Alexandra Kosteniuk and Almira Skripchenko (both rated 2400+ at the time) over 50 years later, only this time it was drawn.

Kosteniuk,A - Skripchenko,A
PWPW S.A Chess Cup, Warsaw, POL (7), 20.06.2004

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 Nd7 4.Bc4 h6 5.dxe5 dxe5 6.Bxf7+ Kxf7 7.Nxe5+ Kf6 8.Qd4 c5 9.Nxd7+ Ke7 10.Qxc5+ Kxd7 11.Qb5+ Ke7 12.Nc3 Kf7 13.Be3 Nf6 14.e5 Ng4 15.0-0 Qh4 16.h3 Nxe3 17.fxe3+ Kg8 18.Qb3+ Kh7 19.Nd5 Qg5 20.Rf7 Bxh3 21.Qd3+ Kg8 22.Nf4 Kxf7 23.Nxh3 Qxe5 24.Rf1+ Kg8 25.Qc4+ Kh7 26.Qd3+ Kg8 27.Qc4+ Kh7 28.Qd3+ Kg8 29.Qc4+ drawn


(By the way, you might want to check out Bill's new chess magazine White Knight.)

License to Steal

It is sometimes said that "being lucky is better than having a license to steal." Cyberkid, who recently had the white pieces against elmasgrande in the Blackburne Shilling Jerome Gambit game, below, can appreciate that...

Drawn game.

Black ran out of time and White has no material to mate.

graphic by Jeff Bucchino, the Wizard of Draws

From Tragedy to Farce

Having decided to stop playing the Jerome Gambit until I found more balance with analysis and study (see "Busted"), I nonetheless tried to sneak in a game today... It should be no surprise that the results were completely disastrous, moving beyond tragedy to farce.

perrypawnpusher  - MrScrumps
blitz, FICS, 2010

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ke6 7.Qf5+ Kd6 8.Qf4

A mouse slip (I intended, of course, my standard 8.f4), not surprising given that I was trying to make a move while shooing the dog away from me...

 8...Qf6 White resigned

Actually, I asked to abort the game, but my opponent declined.

Ghosts

We are approaching Halloween, that day for ghosts and ghouls and all things scary. Maybe my opponent in the following game got into the spirit of the day early, as he seems to have seen some kind of a ghost...

perrypawnpusher - hklett
blitz, FICS, 2010

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Nc3 Bc5

The Italian Four Knights Game.

5.Bxf7+

The Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit.

5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.d4

7...Bxd4

Often played, although 7...Bd6 8.dxe5 Bxe5 is best.

8.Qxd4 d6 9.f4 Nc6 10.Qd3 Be6

Perhaps not the best move here, but at least it prevents Black from falling into the "optical illusion" variation. 

11.0-0 Rf8 12.f5 Bd7 13.Qc4+ d5

The alternative, 13...Ke8, the move I was trying to force (to prevent castling-by-hand) was actually better.

14.exd5

Rybka prefers the Knight to capture here, but I am not sure that I understand why.

14...Ne5 15.Qd4 Re8 16.Bf4 c5

Planning 17.dxc6 Nxc6, safeguarding the Knight. 

17.Qxc5 b6

Rybka says that the Queen should go to that square.

18.Qd4 Black resigned

This is somewhat reminiscent of my recent game against molerat, in that I cannot see why my opponent resigned.

Perhaps he thought he was losing his Knight on e5, but 18...Neg4 19.h3 Nh6 20.Bxh6 gxh6 led to a relatively even game, where White has three pawns for his sacrificed piece.

In any event, this game squared us with one win apiece. Rather, one loss apiece, as we have now each given away a game to the other (as I did in our earlier match).