1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ ...and related lines
(risky/nonrisky lines, tactics & psychology for fast, exciting play)
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Busch-Gass Gambit
Friday, March 13, 2009
Semi-Italian Jerome Gambit Encore
5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.Qh5+ g6
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Coffee house
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
If I write all this, and someone reads it...
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
London Calling... Nine Months of Blog
Monday, March 9, 2009
I hate chess...
I hate chess.
Well, not exactly. Not yet. But, almost. Some days...
Take a look a the following position that arose in a recent game of mine on FICS.That's me with the white pieces, stumbling around with what should have been an attack. Reminds you a bit of that comment by Harry Bird, no?
Place the contents of the chess box in a hat, shake them up vigorously, pour them on the board from a height of two feet -- and you get the style of Steinitz.
What a mess! Chess masters who say that they talk to their chess pieces, or that their pieces talk to them: what would they be hearing now??
17.Bxe6
17...Bxd6Light-squared White Bishop: I suppose you're all wondering why I called you together today...
Dark-squared Black Bishop: Excuse me, I think that there's something you left off of the agenda...
You see, things like this shouldn't happen.
Stumble-bum players like me shouldn't knowingly sacrifice their Queens like this.
It's just not natural.
18.Bxf7+ Kh6 19.Nxd6 g6
In both cases, though, White would have still been better. The problem is, my Queen sac was correct.
20.Nxf5+ gxf5
Tossing in the towel. He could have delayed the mate with 20...Kh5 21.h3 Ne5 22.Ng7+Kh6 23.N5e6+ g5 24.Bxg5 checkmate.
21.Ne6 checkmate
I'm glad I got that out of my system.
Sunday, March 8, 2009
To belabor a point...
What I know about them would fill a thimble. Almost.
And most of what I know concerns endings featuring Rook pawns. See "One good blunder deserves another" and "All's well that ends well". Mickey Mouse stuff.
So why do I keep running into that stuff in my games??
Case in point: the following position comes from a recent typical FICS blitz game where I am getting destroyed by a much better player.
Ho-hum. White has only to play 58.Qa1, blocking my pawn, and then find the inevitable mate-in-ten-(or whatever)-moves that follows.
Instead, my opponent shows an unfamiliarity with another odd Rook-pawn ending, playing the Queen check 58.Qb8+.
Alas for him, it turns out that this allows a crucial tempo for Black to get his King to the second rank, 58...Kc2 and now the game is drawn.*
The usual strategy in Queen + Rook vs an advanced King + pawn-on-the-seventh/second rank is for the Queen to approach the enemy king by making a zig-zagging series of checks while threatening to win the pawn.
Eventually the defending monarch (dodging the checks and protecting the pawn) will need to step in front of his pawn, blocking its promotion. At that point, the White King can make a move toward where the action is.
The Black King will then move and unblock his pawn – but the White Queen will check him back there, using the found tempo to then move her King another step closer.
This takes a bit of time, but it is as relentless as the tides. Eventually the pawn will be captured, or the White King checkmated.
Unless the pawn is a Rook pawn or a Bishop pawn. Then, there is the possibility of a stalemate.
59.Qc7+ Kb1 60.Qb6+ Ka1
61.Qg1+ Kb2 62.Qf2+ Kb1 63.Qe1+ Kb2 64.Qd2+
Hoping for 64...Ka1 Qc1 checkmate!
Frustrating, isn't it?
66.Qc3+ Kb1 67.Qb3+ Ka1 But for a tempo!
68.Qa3 Kb1 69.Kf5 a1Q 70.Qxa1+ Kxa1 draw
(*This was a 3 0 blitz game, and my opponent had an advantage in time by move 60. Had he been more familiar with this endgame and simply played out his moves quickly – despite being aware that such a strategy would lead to no advantage – he would likely have won the game on time. I considered his 69th move a sporting, gentlemanly gesture.)