I have always rolled on the floor laughing when I hear Jonathan Coulton's goofball song "Re: Your Brains".
Corporate zombies, anyone?
What could be better?
How about a video with CaptainValor signing the song in American Sign Language (ASL)?
What a scream!
This is for all of my friends in the United States Chess Association of the Deaf, as well as the good people under the auspices of the International Committe of Silent Chess.
We'll be back to the Jerome Gambit tomorrow – scary enough for you?
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ ...and related lines
(risky/nonrisky lines, tactics & psychology for fast, exciting play)
Saturday, September 4, 2010
Friday, September 3, 2010
Second verse, same as the first...
My first game against Abatwa (see"Pulled Up Short") was short. I challenged him again days later: would anything be different?
perrypawnpusher - Abatwa
blitz, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6
Black decided, after some thought, not to play the Blackburne Shilling Gambit, as in our first game, perrypawnpusher - Abatwa, blitz, FICS, 2010 (1-0, 8).
Good choice, but he was not out of the woods yet.
4.Nc3 Bc5 5.Bxf7+
The Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit.
5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.d4
7...Rf8
Figuring, I guess, that since he is going to lose a piece no matter which one he moves, he might as well prepare to safegard his King by castling-by-hand. Under other circumstances this would be a fine idea, but his best move here was 7...Bd6.
8.dxe5 Ne8
Understandably wanting to stay a piece ahead, but it was necessary to surrender one with 8...d6 9.exf6 Qxf6 10.0-0 Qe5 when White will have an edge.
9.Qd5+ Ke7
After the game Rybka showed that Black's King could reach safety in a round-about way: 9...Kg6 10.Qxc5 d6 11.Qd4 Kf7 12.Be3 Kg8. However, after 13.0-0-0 White is clearly better.
10.Bg5+ Black resigned
What an uncomfortable position!
After 10...Nf6 11.exf6+ gxf6 12.Qxc5+ d6 it looks like White has won two pieces, only to have left two en prise himself, but with 13.Nd5+! he can give the Bishop back and maintain the attack, e.g. 13...Kd7 14.Qd4 fxg5 15.Qg7+ (or 15.0-0-0).
perrypawnpusher - Abatwa
blitz, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6
Black decided, after some thought, not to play the Blackburne Shilling Gambit, as in our first game, perrypawnpusher - Abatwa, blitz, FICS, 2010 (1-0, 8).
Good choice, but he was not out of the woods yet.
4.Nc3 Bc5 5.Bxf7+
The Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit.
5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.d4
7...Rf8
Figuring, I guess, that since he is going to lose a piece no matter which one he moves, he might as well prepare to safegard his King by castling-by-hand. Under other circumstances this would be a fine idea, but his best move here was 7...Bd6.
8.dxe5 Ne8
Understandably wanting to stay a piece ahead, but it was necessary to surrender one with 8...d6 9.exf6 Qxf6 10.0-0 Qe5 when White will have an edge.
9.Qd5+ Ke7
After the game Rybka showed that Black's King could reach safety in a round-about way: 9...Kg6 10.Qxc5 d6 11.Qd4 Kf7 12.Be3 Kg8. However, after 13.0-0-0 White is clearly better.
10.Bg5+ Black resigned
What an uncomfortable position!
After 10...Nf6 11.exf6+ gxf6 12.Qxc5+ d6 it looks like White has won two pieces, only to have left two en prise himself, but with 13.Nd5+! he can give the Bishop back and maintain the attack, e.g. 13...Kd7 14.Qd4 fxg5 15.Qg7+ (or 15.0-0-0).
Thursday, September 2, 2010
BSG: Later on in the Discussion
Last year I presented part of an old discussion about the Blackburne Shilling Gambit and 4.Bxf7+ at ChessGames.com. A year later the discussion continued. Here are relevant parts, with my comments.
Helmut Wieteck - Klaus Dutschke
Lahnstein, 19991.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Ke8 6.Qh5+ g6 7.Nxg6 Qf6 8.Nxh8+ Ke7 9.d3 Bh6 10.Na3 Bxc1 11.Rxc1 Qxh8 12.Qc5+ Ke8 13.Qxc7 Nf3+ 14.gxf3 Qxb2 15.Kd2 Qxa3 16.Rhg1 Qxa2 17.Qe5+ Kd8 18.Qh8 Qa5+ 19.c3 Qa2+ 20.Rc2 Qe6 21.Qxg8+ Qxg8 22.Rxg8+ Kc7 23.f4 b6 24.f5 a5 25.f6 Black resigned
TheGreatNN: Is 4.Bxf7! the best way to deal with the Blackburne Shilling Gambit? It looks pretty strong here.
acirce:
TheGreatNN: I don't think 7...hxg6 is any good because after 8.Qxh8 Nxc2+ 9.Kd1 Nxa1 10.Qxg8 white will be up material, even if black will have a bit better development (e.g. by 10...Qg5 11.Rg1 d5 12.Qxd5 Bg4+ 13.Ke1 Qxd5 14.exd5 etc.) My computer, however, came up with 5...Ke6! It then continued 6.Nd3!? Nf6 7.o-o d6 8.b4 Kf7 9.Bb2 Ne6 and it doesn't appear white has good compensation for his sacrifice. (Arasan 3.5, 9 ply.) But ...Ke6 looks like it's just welcoming disaster, so I don't know what to think.
acirce: Actually, he will be down material! After the line you give I feel that White is pretty much just lost. Better looks 8.Qxg6+ Ke7 9.Qg5+ Nf6 10.Qc5+ d6 11.Qxd4 and White has 4 pawns for a bishop but has only developed his queen.
5...Ke6 just has to be unsound but maybe 5...Ke7 is simple and working. At least this is not what you're looking for as White generally speaking.
Cyphelium:
Muhlock vs B Kostic, 1912
I think we agreed on that 4. Bxf7+ is not convincing. The analysis lead to unclear positions were white often had to defend. One amusing line we finally arrived at was 4... Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Ke8 6.Qh5+ g6 7.Nxg6 Nf6 8.Qe5+ Ne6 9.Nxh8 d5!? 10.exd5 Bd6 11.Nf7 Kxf7 12.dxe6+ Bxe6 13.Qe2 Qg8 and black seems to have compensation?! Also, the 4...Ke7!? move was mentioned as playable. The conclusion is, I think, that 4.Bxf7+ is likely to lead to messy and unclear positions...
acirce:
Cyphelium:
Seraphina:
Granite: Bxf7+ seems to give good compensation for the piece. You get two central pawns and the black king is also trapped in the center. Moreso, you gain some time in development. So that's 2 pawns, a loose centralized king, and a gain of time for a piece - I'd say it's probably strong enough to be playable.
Rick: The "best" response to 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4 has to be either 4.0-0, 4.Nxd4, 4.d3, 4.Nc3 or 4.c3.
4.Bxf7+!? is shocking & unexpected and can lead to exciting and/or unclear play which will favor the better-prepared combatant. The updated New Year's Database has 2,676 games with this move. White scored 56% (only 2% of the games were draws).
After 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Black has two popular defenses, 5...Ke8 and 5...Ke6, and two lesser-played defenses, 5...Ke7 and 5...Kf6.
Seen most often is 5...Ke8, and after 6.Qh5+ g6 7.Nxg6, best play for both sides is 7...hxg6 8.Qxg6+ Ke7 9.Qg5+, when Black can go for the draw-by-repetition with 9...Ke8; or go for an unbalanced (but largely equal) position as acirce suggested above with 9...Nf6 10.Qc5+ d6 11.Qxd4 when White has four pawns for a piece and it is unclear if Black has an open King or open lines for development.
Seraphina's suggestion of 10...Ke8 (followed by 11...d5) instead of 10...d6 is a thoughtful one and a likely improvement, but the battle of piece vs 4 pawns remains contentious.
The problem with Cyphelium's suggested line 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Ke8 6.Qh5+ g6 7.Nxg6 Nf6 8.Qe5+ Ne6 9.Nxh8 d5!? 10.exd5 Bd6 is that White can play 11.Qe2!? instead of 11.Nf7, with advantage – although the line that he gives, 11.Nf7 Kxf7 12.dxe6+ Bxe6 13.Qe2 Qg8 may be better for White, anyhow, as he is the exchange and three pawns ahead.
Risky, but not necessarily "unsound", 5...Ke6 provokes feelings wonderfully described by Seraphina. In 667 games in the Database, White scores 50% (again, draws make up only 2% of the games). Best seems to be 6.c3 Kxe5 7.cxd4+ Ke6 and Black's King runs for cover as White develops his pieces, with roughly an equal game.
After 5...Ke7 (330 games in the Database, White scores 47%, draws are 4%) I think White does best again with 6.c3, and after 6...d6 7.cxd4 dxe5 8.dxe5 Qd3!? the game is unclear, but likely balanced.
Finally, I think 5...Kf6 (78 games in the Database, White scores 60%, draws are 1%) should be met by 6.Nf3, again with an even game.
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Pulled up Short
This Blackburne Shilling Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4) game was galloping along toward lightly-explored territory when a sudden Knight move caused it to pull up short and end quickly...
perrypawnpusher - Abatwa
blitz 12 4, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4
The Blackburne Shilling Gambit.
4.Bxf7+
The Blackburne Shilling Jerome Gambit.
4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Ke6 6.c3 Nc6
I had looked at this move in depth (see "Clearly Unclear") based on the games of Jerome Gambit Gemeinde member GOH at FICS.
7.d4 Nce7
8.Qg4+ Black resigned
Black is going to lose his Queen after either 8...Kd6 9.Nf7+ or 8...Nf5 9.Qxf5+ Kd6 10.Nf7+.
This was good enough for me, although after the game Rybka pointed out that 8.d5+, instead, led to checkmate.
perrypawnpusher - Abatwa
blitz 12 4, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4
The Blackburne Shilling Gambit.
4.Bxf7+
The Blackburne Shilling Jerome Gambit.
4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Ke6 6.c3 Nc6
I had looked at this move in depth (see "Clearly Unclear") based on the games of Jerome Gambit Gemeinde member GOH at FICS.
7.d4 Nce7
8.Qg4+ Black resigned
Black is going to lose his Queen after either 8...Kd6 9.Nf7+ or 8...Nf5 9.Qxf5+ Kd6 10.Nf7+.
This was good enough for me, although after the game Rybka pointed out that 8.d5+, instead, led to checkmate.
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Who has fallen for whose trap?
Travelling the web, I stopped in at ChessForums.com after noticing something in their "Discussion & Strategy" subsection, "Beginner's Corner".
A poster asked for suggestions of "any smart tricks or traps" and later indicated
All right! The poster gives the first three moves of the Blackburne Shilling Gambit – a well-known trap (but not too well known, or people wouldn't still fall for it).
Better yet, he gives the Jerome Gambit treatment (4.Bxf7+) in response!
So: who has fallen for whose trap??
A poster asked for suggestions of "any smart tricks or traps" and later indicated
This is for example what I would call a trap
1.e4 e5
2.bc4 nc6
3.nf3 nd4
4.bxf7 kxf7
5.nxe5 ke8
6.Qh5 and so on...
All right! The poster gives the first three moves of the Blackburne Shilling Gambit – a well-known trap (but not too well known, or people wouldn't still fall for it).
Better yet, he gives the Jerome Gambit treatment (4.Bxf7+) in response!
So: who has fallen for whose trap??
Monday, August 30, 2010
Two Steps Forward, One Step Back
Despite the fact that I specialize in the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+), sometimes it feels that I actually play real chess. Almost.
perrypawnpusher - drandika
blitz, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6
The Semi-Italian Opening.
4.0-0 Nf6 5.Nc3 Bc5
The Semi-Italian Four Knights Game.
6.Bxf7+
The Semi-Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit.
6...Kxf7 7.Nxe5+ Nxe5 8.d4
8...Bd6 9.dxe5 Bxe5 10.f4
I recently analyzed this move (see "THIS is why I play the Jerome Gambit") enough to know that the best move for White is actually 10.Ne2, and that after the text move Black can have a good game if he makes the right choices. But the position is tricky, and I thought it was worth a try in blitz.
(Opening preparation – how about that?)
10...Bxc3
Good, and better than 10...Bxf4 11.Rxf4 Re8 12.Qd5+ Re6 13.e5 c6 14.Qd4 Kg8 15.exf6 gxf6 16.Rg4+ Kh7 17.Qd3+ Kh8 18.Bxh6 Re7 19.Qg6 d6 20.Bg7+ Kg8 21.Bxf6+ Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - KnightRoyal, blitz, FICS, 2010.
11.bxc3 Rf8
It is likely that my opponent was getting ready to castle-by-hand. Correct was either 11...Qe7 or 11...Qf8.
12.e5 Ne4
Not thought through. This happens a lot in the Jerome Gambit, where defenders seem to have a hard time devoting enough energy to countering a refuted opening.
After the game Rybka suggested 12...d6 13.exf6 Qxf6 when Black still had the edge.
13.Qd5+ Ke8 14.Qxe4 c6
It's funny, as soon as I saw this move, I thought about Paul Morphy - Louis Paulsen, New York, 4th match game, 1857: 1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.Nf3 e6 4.Nxd4 Bc5 5.Nb3 Bb6 6.Nc3 Ne7 7.Bf4 0-0 8.Bd6 (1-0, 36) – it's hard to forget that White Bishop as a "bone in the throat."
analysis diagram
I know that Paulsen was playing the Sicilian and my opponent was defending against the Jerome Gambit, but it was a pleasant surprise to see a strategic idea bubble up from my chess unconscious.
(Learning from the past Masters – how about that?)
15.Ba3 Rf7
Black has to do something about the Bishop, something like 15...Qb6+ and 16...c5, blocking its influence on the King side.
In response, White will either put pressure on the center with Rad1 or on the King side with Qh7. The advanced "Jerome pawns" will force a break through.
16.f5
This move is good, but 16.Bd6 would have been crushing: White would have a humorous mating attack with Qh7 followed by Qh8+, and Black would have to give up his Queen to stay alive.
16...Qa5
Going after the Bishop – something that I actually had anticpated.
(Sacrificing, not losing a piece – how about that?)
Black's best was still to counter the Bishop with 16...Qb6+ 17.Rf2 c5; although 18.f6 changes the front of the attack: 18...gxf6 19.Rxf6 Rxf6 20.exf6+ Qe6 21.Qh4, threatening Re1 (the eeeeeeee file!), Qxh6, and Bxc5.
17.e6 dxe6 18.Bb4
Momentarily losing faith in my analysis of tactics...
I had seen 18.fxe6 Rxf1+ 19.Rxf1 Qxa3, but didn't see clearly after 20.Qg6+ – which was the winning line.
18...Qb6+ 19.Kh1 c5 20.fxe6
Still on the attack (the Bishop is still taboo) although White will have to be creative to bring on the heat.
20...Rxf1+
After the game Rybka suggested: 20...Qxe6 21.Qh7 Kd7 22.Rxf7+ Qxf7 23.Qd3+ Kc7 24.Bxc5 Qe6 25.Qg3+ Kc6 26.Rd1 Kxc5 27.Qc7+ Kb5 28.a4+ Ka6 29.Rd6+ b6 30.Rxe6 Bxe6 which gives White a Queen vs Rook and Bishop...
analysis diagram
This was, of course, well beyond my analysis.
21.Rxf1 cxb4
Grabbing the Bishop, which was okay with me – I correctly evaluated that I still was winning.
Black's best was 21...Qxe6, when again White gives Rook and Bishop for Black's Queen, e.g. 22.Qf3 cxb4 23.Qf8+ Kd7 24.Qxg7+ Kd6 25.Rf6.
22.Qg6+ Ke7 23.Rf7+
My original plan was 23.Qf7+ which was again, crushing, but at the last minute I decided (without analysis!) to "add another piece to the attack".
(It is sad to have come this far, only to give in to foggy thinking.)
It shouldn't have been too hard to see 23.Qf7+ Kd6 24.Rd1+ Ke5 25.e7 and White has too many threats to counter (even if I couldn't immediately analyze them out).
23...Kd6 24.e7+ Be6 25.Rxg7
The last poor choice, again due to an unwillingness – temporary inability? – to force my foggy brain to look further.
White's Rook and Queen exchanged roles from my original analysis, which means that they would have to do the same here: the Queen checks, the Rook escorts, 25.Qd3+ Kc6 and then 26.Rf8. After Black's mate-threat counter – 26...bxc3 27.h3 Qb1+ 28.Kh2 Qb4 – White wins a Rook with and remains the exchange up.
Whew!
25...Qe3
Black sees his chance to force a draw and takes it!
26.h3 Qe1+ 27.Kh2 Qe5+ 28.Kh1 Qe1+ 29.Kh2 Qe5+ 30.Kh1 Qe1+ 31.Kh2 Qe5+ drawn by repetition
A great save by my opponent!
perrypawnpusher - drandika
blitz, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6
The Semi-Italian Opening.
4.0-0 Nf6 5.Nc3 Bc5
The Semi-Italian Four Knights Game.
6.Bxf7+
The Semi-Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit.
6...Kxf7 7.Nxe5+ Nxe5 8.d4
8...Bd6 9.dxe5 Bxe5 10.f4
I recently analyzed this move (see "THIS is why I play the Jerome Gambit") enough to know that the best move for White is actually 10.Ne2, and that after the text move Black can have a good game if he makes the right choices. But the position is tricky, and I thought it was worth a try in blitz.
(Opening preparation – how about that?)
10...Bxc3
Good, and better than 10...Bxf4 11.Rxf4 Re8 12.Qd5+ Re6 13.e5 c6 14.Qd4 Kg8 15.exf6 gxf6 16.Rg4+ Kh7 17.Qd3+ Kh8 18.Bxh6 Re7 19.Qg6 d6 20.Bg7+ Kg8 21.Bxf6+ Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - KnightRoyal, blitz, FICS, 2010.
11.bxc3 Rf8
It is likely that my opponent was getting ready to castle-by-hand. Correct was either 11...Qe7 or 11...Qf8.
12.e5 Ne4
Not thought through. This happens a lot in the Jerome Gambit, where defenders seem to have a hard time devoting enough energy to countering a refuted opening.
After the game Rybka suggested 12...d6 13.exf6 Qxf6 when Black still had the edge.
13.Qd5+ Ke8 14.Qxe4 c6
It's funny, as soon as I saw this move, I thought about Paul Morphy - Louis Paulsen, New York, 4th match game, 1857: 1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.Nf3 e6 4.Nxd4 Bc5 5.Nb3 Bb6 6.Nc3 Ne7 7.Bf4 0-0 8.Bd6 (1-0, 36) – it's hard to forget that White Bishop as a "bone in the throat."
analysis diagram
I know that Paulsen was playing the Sicilian and my opponent was defending against the Jerome Gambit, but it was a pleasant surprise to see a strategic idea bubble up from my chess unconscious.
(Learning from the past Masters – how about that?)
15.Ba3 Rf7
Black has to do something about the Bishop, something like 15...Qb6+ and 16...c5, blocking its influence on the King side.
In response, White will either put pressure on the center with Rad1 or on the King side with Qh7. The advanced "Jerome pawns" will force a break through.
16.f5
This move is good, but 16.Bd6 would have been crushing: White would have a humorous mating attack with Qh7 followed by Qh8+, and Black would have to give up his Queen to stay alive.
16...Qa5
Going after the Bishop – something that I actually had anticpated.
(Sacrificing, not losing a piece – how about that?)
Black's best was still to counter the Bishop with 16...Qb6+ 17.Rf2 c5; although 18.f6 changes the front of the attack: 18...gxf6 19.Rxf6 Rxf6 20.exf6+ Qe6 21.Qh4, threatening Re1 (the eeeeeeee file!), Qxh6, and Bxc5.
17.e6 dxe6 18.Bb4
Momentarily losing faith in my analysis of tactics...
I had seen 18.fxe6 Rxf1+ 19.Rxf1 Qxa3, but didn't see clearly after 20.Qg6+ – which was the winning line.
18...Qb6+ 19.Kh1 c5 20.fxe6
Still on the attack (the Bishop is still taboo) although White will have to be creative to bring on the heat.
20...Rxf1+
After the game Rybka suggested: 20...Qxe6 21.Qh7 Kd7 22.Rxf7+ Qxf7 23.Qd3+ Kc7 24.Bxc5 Qe6 25.Qg3+ Kc6 26.Rd1 Kxc5 27.Qc7+ Kb5 28.a4+ Ka6 29.Rd6+ b6 30.Rxe6 Bxe6 which gives White a Queen vs Rook and Bishop...
analysis diagram
This was, of course, well beyond my analysis.
21.Rxf1 cxb4
Grabbing the Bishop, which was okay with me – I correctly evaluated that I still was winning.
Black's best was 21...Qxe6, when again White gives Rook and Bishop for Black's Queen, e.g. 22.Qf3 cxb4 23.Qf8+ Kd7 24.Qxg7+ Kd6 25.Rf6.
22.Qg6+ Ke7 23.Rf7+
My original plan was 23.Qf7+ which was again, crushing, but at the last minute I decided (without analysis!) to "add another piece to the attack".
(It is sad to have come this far, only to give in to foggy thinking.)
It shouldn't have been too hard to see 23.Qf7+ Kd6 24.Rd1+ Ke5 25.e7 and White has too many threats to counter (even if I couldn't immediately analyze them out).
23...Kd6 24.e7+ Be6 25.Rxg7
The last poor choice, again due to an unwillingness – temporary inability? – to force my foggy brain to look further.
White's Rook and Queen exchanged roles from my original analysis, which means that they would have to do the same here: the Queen checks, the Rook escorts, 25.Qd3+ Kc6 and then 26.Rf8. After Black's mate-threat counter – 26...bxc3 27.h3 Qb1+ 28.Kh2 Qb4 – White wins a Rook with and remains the exchange up.
Whew!
25...Qe3
Black sees his chance to force a draw and takes it!
26.h3 Qe1+ 27.Kh2 Qe5+ 28.Kh1 Qe1+ 29.Kh2 Qe5+ 30.Kh1 Qe1+ 31.Kh2 Qe5+ drawn by repetition
A great save by my opponent!
Sunday, August 29, 2010
No Breach in the Wall
The move ...Qd8-h4+ can be played in the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) with great effect.
Sometimes.
Wall,B - Edaison
FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+
4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ke6
7.f4 Nf7
8.Qxc5
The capture has also come with preliminaries: 8.Qd5+ Ke7 9.Qxc5+ Ke8 10.0-0 d6 11.Qe3 Qe7 12.Nc3 Bd7 13.d4 Bb5 14.Nxb5 Kd7 15.Qh3+ Kd8 16.Nc3 Black resigned, mrjoker-Dabo, ICC 2008; and
8.Qf5+ Kd6 9.Qd5+ Ke7 10.Qxc5+ d6 11.Qd4 Nf6 12.Nc3 Re8 13.d3 Kf8 14.0-0 c5 15.Qf2 b6 16.Bd2 Bb7 17.Rae1 d5 18.e5 Nd7 19.e6 Re7 20.exf7 Rxf7 21.Re6 Nf6 22.Rfe1 d4 23.Ne4 Nxe4 24.dxe4 Bc8 25.Re5 Qd6 26.Rd5 Qh6 27.Qg3 Bb7 28.f5 Bxd5 29.Bxh6 gxh6 30.exd5 Rf6 31.Re6 Rxf5 32.Rxh6 Rf7 33.Qd6+ Kg8 34.Qe6 Raf8 35.Rf6 Kg7 36.Rxf7+ Rxf7 37.d6 Kf8 38.d7 Re7 39.Qf6+ Rf7 40.Qxf7+ Kxf7 41.d8Q Ke6 Black resigned, Superpippo - Sulu, FICS, 2002.
8...Qh4+
Or 8...d6 9.Qc3 Nf6 10.0-0 Kd7 11.e5 Nd5 12.e6+ Ke7 13.Qxg7 Bxe6 14.f5 Qg8 15.Qxg8 Raxg8 16.fxe6 Kxe6 17.Nc3 Nxc3 18.dxc3 Rg6 19.Be3 b6 20.Rae1 Ne5 21.Bd4 Rhg8 22.Re2 c5 23.Bxe5 dxe5 24.Rfe1 Rg5 25.h4 Rf5 26.Re4 h5 27.c4 Rgf8 28.c3 Rf4 29.Rxe5+ Kd6 30.Rd5+ Kc6 31.Re6+ Kb7 32.Rxh5 Rxc4 33.Rh7+ Ka6 34.Ree7 Ra8 35.g3 Black resigned, tomvandermeer - keeswillern, GameKnot, 2006.
9.g3 Qe7
The Queen check did not prove very helpful, but the retreat will prove disastrous. The Queen needed to return to d8.
10.Qd5+
Curiously, in an earlier game White missed the checkmate-in-two, and later lost: 10.f5+ Kf6 11.Qd4+ Ne5 12.d3 c5 13.Qc3 Kf7 14.Bf4 Nf3+ 15.Kf2 Nd4 16.Nd2 Nf6 17.e5 Ng4+ 18.Kg2 Rd8 19.e6+ dxe6 20.fxe6+ Nxe6 21.Rhe1 Nxf4+ 22.gxf4 Qh4 23.Nf3 Qf2+ 24.Kh1 Qxf3+ 25.Kg1 Qf2+ 26.Kh1 Qf3+ 27.Kg1 Qf2+ 28.Kh1 Qxh2 checkmate, Nesseerd - MYCAT, FICS, 2007.
10...Kf6 11.Qf5 checkmate
Sometimes.
Wall,B - Edaison
FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+
4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ke6
7.f4 Nf7
8.Qxc5
The capture has also come with preliminaries: 8.Qd5+ Ke7 9.Qxc5+ Ke8 10.0-0 d6 11.Qe3 Qe7 12.Nc3 Bd7 13.d4 Bb5 14.Nxb5 Kd7 15.Qh3+ Kd8 16.Nc3 Black resigned, mrjoker-Dabo, ICC 2008; and
8.Qf5+ Kd6 9.Qd5+ Ke7 10.Qxc5+ d6 11.Qd4 Nf6 12.Nc3 Re8 13.d3 Kf8 14.0-0 c5 15.Qf2 b6 16.Bd2 Bb7 17.Rae1 d5 18.e5 Nd7 19.e6 Re7 20.exf7 Rxf7 21.Re6 Nf6 22.Rfe1 d4 23.Ne4 Nxe4 24.dxe4 Bc8 25.Re5 Qd6 26.Rd5 Qh6 27.Qg3 Bb7 28.f5 Bxd5 29.Bxh6 gxh6 30.exd5 Rf6 31.Re6 Rxf5 32.Rxh6 Rf7 33.Qd6+ Kg8 34.Qe6 Raf8 35.Rf6 Kg7 36.Rxf7+ Rxf7 37.d6 Kf8 38.d7 Re7 39.Qf6+ Rf7 40.Qxf7+ Kxf7 41.d8Q Ke6 Black resigned, Superpippo - Sulu, FICS, 2002.
8...Qh4+
Or 8...d6 9.Qc3 Nf6 10.0-0 Kd7 11.e5 Nd5 12.e6+ Ke7 13.Qxg7 Bxe6 14.f5 Qg8 15.Qxg8 Raxg8 16.fxe6 Kxe6 17.Nc3 Nxc3 18.dxc3 Rg6 19.Be3 b6 20.Rae1 Ne5 21.Bd4 Rhg8 22.Re2 c5 23.Bxe5 dxe5 24.Rfe1 Rg5 25.h4 Rf5 26.Re4 h5 27.c4 Rgf8 28.c3 Rf4 29.Rxe5+ Kd6 30.Rd5+ Kc6 31.Re6+ Kb7 32.Rxh5 Rxc4 33.Rh7+ Ka6 34.Ree7 Ra8 35.g3 Black resigned, tomvandermeer - keeswillern, GameKnot, 2006.
9.g3 Qe7
The Queen check did not prove very helpful, but the retreat will prove disastrous. The Queen needed to return to d8.
10.Qd5+
Curiously, in an earlier game White missed the checkmate-in-two, and later lost: 10.f5+ Kf6 11.Qd4+ Ne5 12.d3 c5 13.Qc3 Kf7 14.Bf4 Nf3+ 15.Kf2 Nd4 16.Nd2 Nf6 17.e5 Ng4+ 18.Kg2 Rd8 19.e6+ dxe6 20.fxe6+ Nxe6 21.Rhe1 Nxf4+ 22.gxf4 Qh4 23.Nf3 Qf2+ 24.Kh1 Qxf3+ 25.Kg1 Qf2+ 26.Kh1 Qf3+ 27.Kg1 Qf2+ 28.Kh1 Qxh2 checkmate, Nesseerd - MYCAT, FICS, 2007.
10...Kf6 11.Qf5 checkmate
Labels:
Dabo,
Edaison,
FICS,
GameKnot,
ICC,
keeswillern,
mrjoker,
MYCAT,
Nesseerd,
sulu,
Superpippo,
tomvandermeer,
Wall
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)