Merry Christmas

Santa says, "Remember that when it comes to the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) it is better to give than to receive!"

Wait 'Till Next Year!

There was a time when the New York Mets baseball team was so good at losing that fans would appear on Opening Day with signs promising although this year may bring more disaster, Wait 'Til Next Year!

The following game is given with that spirit in mind, as White deserved – and no doubt next time will play – better.

macgregorchess - ahphong
blitz, FICS, 2010

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Kf6

An unusual reply (there are only 25 examples before this one in the New Year's Database, with White scoring 76%) looked at in the coverage of the game The Perfesser vs Talking LCD Chess.

7.f4

Certainly thematic, but White should, instead, regain both sacrificed pieces with 7.Qf5+ Ke7 8.Qxe5+ Kf8 9.Qxc5+ d6, leaving him two pawns to the good.

Interestingly enough, other games have seen 7.Qh4+, 7.0-0, 7.Nc3 and 7.d3.

The recommended 7.Qf5+ does not bring "Instant Victory" but it certainly brings "Instant Advantage" and should be remembered in the New Year.

7...Nf7 8.Qxc5 Qe7

Wow! Another thematic move, this time by Black. Usually ...Qe7 is part of a stirring counter-attack for the second player, but in this instance it has a flaw.

9.e5+

Readers, with their clocks not ticking, may have noticed 9.Qf5#.

9...Kg6 10.Qxc7

Grabbing an extra pawn, but it was probably time to grab the draw with both hands: 10.f5+ Kxf5 (if 10...Kh5 then 11.g4+ Kxg4 13.Qc4+ with the same idea) 11.0-0+ Kg6 12.Qd4 and White repeats the position by checking the enemy King.

10...Qh4+

Here comes trouble.

11.g3 Qg4 12.Nc3 Qf3 13.Rf1 Qc6

White has repelled the invader, and with an exchange of Queens would now stand about even, his "Jerome pawns" accounting for the sacrificed piece. Instead, he overlooks one last thing.

14.Qd8 Nxd8 White resigned

Scared to Death

Sometimes the Jerome Gambit (and its relatives) can have a frightening impact on those who face it, causing them to make decisions that they might not make during calmer times... Here are three recent example.

jollygood - kremba
blitz, FICS, 2010

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4 4.Bxf7+

The Blackburne Shilling Jerome Gambit

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Ke6 6.Qh5 Nf6 7.Qg5 h6 8.Qf4 Nxc2+ 9.Kd1 Nxa1 10.d4 d5 11.Re1 Nxe4 12.f3 Bb4 13.Re2 g5 14.Qg4+ Kd6 15.Nf7+ Kc6 Black resigned

It is true that Black's Queen is threatened, and that White will win it with check, 16.Nxd8+. After 16...Rxd8, though, Black will have a Rook, a Knight and a Bishop for his Queen; and after, for example, 17.Qh5 Nd6 18.Qxh6 Bf5 he has already begun to consolidate his position.Verdict: complicated, but too soon to resign.


fianchettosstorm  - fwenkey
blitz, FICS, 2010

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.0-0 Nf6 5.Bxf7+

The Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit.

5...Kxf7 6.Ng5+ Kg8 7.c3 h6 8.Nf3 Nxe4 9.d4 exd4 10.cxd4 Bd6 11.Ne5 Nxe5 12.dxe5 Bxe5 13.Re1 Black resigned

It is true that White will now win back a piece, but this will still leave Black up a pawn, and he can add a couple more with 13...Bxh2+ 14.Kxh2 Qh4+ 15.Kg1 Qxf2+ (when he still has a draw in hand via repeated Queen checks).

Declining the Bishop with 13...Bxh2+ 14.Kf1 (14.Kh1? Nxf2+ winning the Queen) still leaves Black up three pawns after 14...Nf6 15.g3 d5 16.Kg2 Bxg3 17.fxg3 Bf5. Verdict: complicated, but too soon to resign.


Petasluk - mihck
blitz, FICS, 2010

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

The Jerome Gambit.

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ g6 7.Qxe5 Black resigned

Verdict: complicated, but too soon to resign.

I Scream, You Scream, We All Scream for... the Jerome Gambit

There's nothing quite like steaming through a 3 0 blitz game with Black on the way to my next Jerome Gambit with White – when I get Jeromed by my opponent.

Sigh.

Be true to the Gemeinde and lose, or play my best and swipe the point?

Hardly a question at all. I'll make it up to the Jerome Gambiteers next post.

vbartenev - perrypawnpusher
blitz 3 0, FICS, 2010

1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.Nh3 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

Arrgghh! I've been struck a mortal blow!

I note other recent games by my opponent with the Jerome theme:

vbartenev  - papaguy
blitz. FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.d3 Nf6 6.h4 Bc5 7.c3 Ng4 8.b4 Bxf2+ 9.Kf1 Be3 10.Na3 Bxc1 11.Qxc1 d6 12.d4 Rf8 13.Nc4 Kg8 14.Qc2 exd4 15.cxd4 Nxd4 16.Qd3 Nxf3 17.gxf3 Qf6 18.Ke2 Ne5 19.Nxe5 Qxe5 20.Qc4+ Be6 21.Qxc7 Qb2+ 22.Kd3 Qa3+ 23.Qc3 Rxf3+ 24.Kd4 Qxc3# 0-1


vbartenev - jneid
blitz, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6 4.d3 Bc5 5.0-0 Nf6 6.Bxf7+ Kxf7 7.a3 a5 8.h3 b5 9.Be3 Bxe3 10.fxe3 d5 11.Nc3 d4 12.exd4 Nxd4 13.Nxe5+ Ke6 14.Ng6 Re8 15.e5 Ng8 16.Qg4+ Nf5 17.Qxf5# 1-0


vbartenev - fearlesss
blitz, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 a6 4.d3 b5 5.Bxf7+ Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.Qh5+ g6 8.Qxe5 Bg7 9.Qd5+ Ke8 10.Qxa8 Ne7 11.0-0 Nc6 12.Nd2 Qe7 13.a4 Qd8 14.axb5 axb5 15.c3 Rg8 16.Re1 h5 17.Nb3 Be5 18.d4 Bf6 19.e5 Be7 20.d5 Nxe5 21.Rxe5 d6 22.Re2 g5 23.Nd4 Bd7 24.Nc6 Qxa8 25.Rxa8+ Kf7 26.Rxg8 Kxg8 27.Nxe7+ Kg7 28.Bxg5 Bg4 29.Re3 Bd1 30.Nc6 1-0


vbartenev  - Roso
blitz, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6 4.d4 d6 5.dxe5 Nxe5 6.Nxe5 dxe5 7.Bxf7+ Ke7 8.Qxd8+ Kxd8 9.Bxg8 Rxg8 10.0-0 Bd6 11.Rd1 g5 12.c4 c5 13.Rxd6+ 1-0


vbartenev  - ChronicKnight
blitz, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.Bc4 Nc6 4.Nf3 Be7 5.Bxf7+ Kxf7 6.Nxd4 Nxd4 7.Qxd4 Bf6 8.Qd5+ Kg6 9.e5 Be7 10.h4 c6 11.h5+ Kf5 12.g4+ Kxg4 13.Qe4# 1-0

vbartenev may be new to the Jerome Gambit Gemeinde, but I must say: Welcome!

As for our game, it is presented for the record, as long as readers understand that as the time evaporated, we both made some silly moves...

4...Kxf7 5.d3

I'm not much of a fan of 5.Ng5+ in the Jerome, but it might be useful here, to force the Black King to the back rank and hold up the development of his Rook.

Also possible is 5.Qe2, threatening the forking check at c4. Even if Black defends his Bishop with 5...d6, White can try 6.Qc4+, as Black's King is driven back (6...Kg6 is met with 7.f4) since 6...Be6 loses to 7.Ng5+.

5...Rf8 6.Bg5 Kg8 7.Qf3 Nc6 8.Qe2 Nd4 9.Qd2 d6 10.c3 Ne6 11.b4 Nxg5 12.Nxg5 Bb6 13.a3 c6 14.Qa2+ d5 15.exd5 cxd5 16.c4 h6 17.Nf3 e4 18.dxe4 Nxe4 19.O-O Be6 20.cxd5 Qxd5 21.Qd2 Qxd2

Best forget that last bit...

22.Nbxd2 Nxd2 23.Rab1 Nxf3+ 24.gxf3 Rxf3 25.Rfe1 Bxf2+ 26.Kh1 Bxe1 27.Rxe1 Bd5 28.Kg1 Raf8 29.Rd1 Bc6 30.Rc1 Rxa3 31.Re1 Ra2 32.h4 Rd8 33.Rc1 Rg2+ 34.Kf1 Rdd2 35.Rxc6 Rdf2+ 36.Ke1 bxc6 37.h5 Ra2 38.Kf1 Rgb2 White resigned

Not Exactly An Advertisement

The following Jerome Gambit game is not exactly an advertisement for the benefits of the opening. It's just that twice when I stopped to think "what do I do now?" my opponent gave up a piece. Why argue?


perrypawnpusher - yuriko
blitz, FICS, 2010

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6

The Semi-Italian Opening.

4.0-0 Nf6 5.Nc3 Bc5

The Semi-Italian Four Knights Game.

6.Bxf7+

The Semi-Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit.

6...Kxf7 7.Nxe5+ Nxe5 8.d4 Bxd4 9.Qxd4 d6 10.f4 Nc6 11.Qd3 Re8

After a rough start – 2 points out of my first 5 games – I have done better with this line – 4 1/2 points out of my last 5 games (including this one).

12.Bd2 Kg8 13.Rae1

White's pieces are developed and Black's King has castled-by-hand. I have very little compensation for my piece. What do I do next?

13...Nb4

Don't laugh – this is the 5th time an opponent has played this move here (and one of those games I lost). Must be some kind of "optical illusion".

14.Qc4+ Kh8

Also possible was 14...Be6, but probably 14...d5 was best.

15.Qxb4 c6

White has an extra pawn and is better developed, but with Black's King safe it will take some work to put these advantages to good use.

Fritz likes the idea of 16.f5 with the plan of containing Black's Bishop and re-deploying his own to f4, but Black can use the time to stir things up on the Queenside: 16...a5 17.Qd4 b5 18.a3 Ba6!? 19.b4 axb4 20.axb4 c5 21.Qd3 Bb7.

analysis diagram








White is better, but Black has interesting counterplay.

16.h3 b6 17.Qc4 c5

After the game Rybka suggested a better way for Black to tussle: 17...a5 18.Rf2 Ba6 19.Qb3 Re7 20.e5 dxe5 21.fxe5 Nd7 22.Bf4 Nc5 23.Qa3 Qd4 24.Bg3 Rae8 25.Rd1 Qb4 26.Rd6 Qxa3 27.bxa3 Bb7

analysis diagram







Black has White's extra, passed pawn under control. Chances exist, too, for a drawish Bishops-of-Opposite-colors endgame.

18.Nd5 Be6 19.Bc3 Nxd5 20.exd5 Bf5 21.Rf2

This is reasonable, but after the game Rybka suggested 21.Rxe8+ Qxe8 22.Re1 Qf7 23.Qe2 as a way to try to squeeze more out of the position.

analysis diagram








Now Black cannot take the d-pawn, as after 23...Qxd5 comes 24.Qh5 Kh7 25.g4 Be6 26.g5 Rf8 27.Bxg7!? Kxg7 28.Qxh6+ Kg8 29.Qxe6+ Qxe6 30.Rxe6 Rxf4 31.Rxd6 leads to a better Rook + pawns endgame for White.

After 23...Bg6 instead, Rybka helps White squeeze his opponent with 24.Qd2 Bf5 25.g4 Bd7 26.f5 Kg8 27.Kg2 Re8 28.Kg3 Rxe1 29.Qxe1 Qxd5 30.Qe7 Qf7 31.Qxd6 Be8 32.b3 Qd7.

analysis diagram






White is better, but "1-0" is still a long way off, and "1/2-1/2" still waits in the shadows.

Not exactly an advertisement for a wild attacking gambit.

21...Qh4

Putting pressure on my position.

22.Qf1 Rxe1 23.Qxe1

Okay, now what do I do?

23...Bxc2

It was nice to see that my opponent was having just as much trouble with the position as I was. He probably saw the Rook "pinned" to my Queen, but only saw my Bishop facing "forward" toward his g7... 

24.Rxc2 Qxe1+ 25.Bxe1 Re8 26.Kf2

Finally I know what to do.

26...g5 27.fxg5 hxg5 28.Re2 Rf8+ 29.Kg1 Kh7 30.Re6 Rf5 31.Rxd6 Rf4 Black resigned

Philidor Defense with a Jerome Touch

As an aside in the post "A New Opening?" which discussed an article from the September 1958 Precita Valley Chess Herald wherin George Koltanowski named John Ishkan's Jerome Gambit the "Trashcan Opening", I presented a Koltanowski game that was a Philidor Defense with a Jerome touch. For extra measure, I added a 2004 Kosteniuk - Skripchenko game with the same line.

It would have been appropriate then to have mentioned a related game and analysis by Francesco Recchia of Italy that had been posted to this blog a year and a half earlier in "A Kind of Jerome Gambit That Wins".

Here is the earliest example that I have found of the opening variation.

Hahlbohm,H - Moorman,L
Chicago, 1917

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 Nd7 4.Bc4 h6 5.dxe5 dxe5 6.Bxf7+

6...Kxf7 7.Nxe5+ Kf6 8.Qd5

Instead, Kosteniuk chose 8.Qd4. Recchia energetically recommended 8.Nc3.

Now 8...Qe8 is Black's only move.

 8...Ne7 9.Qf7+ Kxe5 10.Bf4+ Kd4 11.Qe6 Nc5 12.Be3 checkmate

After posting this, I hoped to try the line in a FICS blitz game. I was not able to reach the exact position, but I put the lessons that I had learned to good use in perrypawnpusher - NN, blitz, FICS, 2010: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3.Bc4 h6 4.d4 Nc6 (4...Nd7 would reach Hahlbohm - Moorman, above. Best was 4...exd4) 5.dxe5 Nxe5 (5...Bg4 is an interesting gambit; otherwise, 5...Qe7 seems necessary) 6.Nxe5 dxe5 7.Bxf7+ Kxf7 8.Qxd8 Black resigned

A Modern Jerome Gambit With A Retro Twist

Speaking of "modern" Jerome Gambit lines – see "A Closer Look at the Big Picture (Part 3)" – here is a Bill Wall game where White bypasses the "classical" 5.Nxe5+ in modern style, only to replace it with 5.b4!?, an Evans Gambit-style blast from the past similar to Charlick's "Evans Jerome Gambit".

Is the line any good? It certainly is, when Black responds with a variation of the "Anti-Bill Wall Gambit".

Wall,B - WNXR
FICS, 2010

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

4...Kxf7 5.b4

5...Bxf2+

Well, it looks like we'll have to save analysis of 5...Bxb4, 5...Bb6 and 5...Be7 for another day.

Black seems to be following the idea I laid out in "Here's my plan..."

Whatever White gets from his sacrifice at f7, Black will now get from his sacrifice at f2.

I also noted the downside for Black in this "I want what you have" reaction

what White typically gets from his sacrifice at f7 is a lost game

6.Kxf2 Nf6 7.Rf1 Nxe4+ 

Pawn-grabbing does not look like a good idea here.

8.Kg1 Rf8 9.b5 Kg8

Another puzzling move: Black seems intent upon returning all the material that White gives him.

Certainly it is a good idea to castle-by-hand (like White did) but can Black afford a piece in order to do so? Perhaps he was relying on the relatively transparent trap mentioned in the next note.

10.bxc6 dxc6 11.d3

Of course 11.Nxe5? falls to 11...Qd4+. Is that what Black had in mind?

11...Nc5 

In a reversal of traditional Jerome Gambit roles, White has the extra
piece while Black has the extra pawns.

12.Ba3 b6 13.Qe1 Bg4 14.Nbd2 Bxf3 15.Nxf3

15...Rxf3

This has to be a mis-calculation.

16.Rxf3 Qd4+ 17.Kh1 Re8 18.Bxc5 bxc5

19.c3 Qd5 20.Qf2 e4 21.Re1 h6 22.Rxe4 Rxe4 23.dxe4 Qd1+ 24.Qf1 Qc2 25.Rf8+ Kh7 26.Qf5+ g6 27.Qf7 checkmate