Showing posts with label Superajadrez. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Superajadrez. Show all posts

Thursday, January 7, 2016

History Clouded



In Mr. Blackburne's Games at Chess (1899), the notorious Jerome Gambit game Amateur - Blackburne was given as "played at Simpson's Divan about 1880."

I have questioned the date that Blackburne gave - See "Flaws (Part I)" - as the August 15, 1885 issue of the Brooklyn Chess Chronicle (J.B. and E.M. Munoz, editors) presented the game as having been "played some months ago" which would suggest that it was played during 1885, but not likely in July or August of that year.

It now looks like I will have to back off from my correction, and add even more uncertainty to the date of the game.

Tim Harding's Joseph Henry Blackburne A Chess Biography (2015) - which, as I have noted, does not give Amateur - Blackburne - shows that the British master left for Australia in December 1884, and spent the first half of 1885 "Down Under". A return home was short-lived, as there was an important tournament to participate in
Blackburne and son apparently disembarked at Plymouth on 4 July. As the ship was only docked at Gravesend on the fifth, they must have come up to London by express train. Every day counted, the first round in Hamsburg being on 12 July. After less than a week in England, Blackburne was off on his travels again. 
The Hamburg tournament ended July 27, wherupon Blackburne went to Hereford for the Counties Chess Association Masters tournament, which started August 3.
The events of 1885, therefore, do not appear consistent with the Brooklyn Chess Chronicle admittedly casual dating.

It is possible to extend Munoz and Munoz's "some months" further back in time and look for Amateur - Blackburne in 1884, although there are difficulties in this, too. Harding notes
Blackburne's mid-career health breakdown began before Christmas 1883 when he was forced to cancel all his engagements.
In an age "long before antibiotics or even aspirin and other effective medicines", Blackburne was quite ill.
In late April or early May [1884] he resumed playing at the [Simpson's] Divan; some casual games are preserved from that period...
However, his participation in Simpson's handicap tournament in the spring was affected by his "unfortunate illness" and it is worth noting
[T]he Morning Post, 30 June 1884, said that Blackburne's illness had "left him in a weak state of health, and has prevented him for several months from pursuing his avocation."
Although he travelled to Glasgow the last week in July 1884, it does not appear that his full health returned before his trip to Australia.

Unless I guess "late April or early May" 1884 (above), then "about 1880" (from Blackburne's book) will be as "precise" as I will be able to date Amateur - Blackburne, until another chess column, magazine, or book reference surfaces; especially if we recall the uncertainties mentioned by Brazilian chess master Hindemburg Melão, Jr. in his article for the online chess site, SuperAjedrez,
...Some sources indicate year of the game as 1868, others indicate 1888, and others indicate 1880. Some sources affirm that it was played in Manchester, others in London. Normally the name of the adversary is not given, having only "NN" or "Amateur", but in at least one source "Millner" is indicated as the name. Also it is not known if it was an individual game or part of a simultaneous display... [T]he game deserves to be cited as one of most beautiful pearls of blindfold Chess...


Monday, September 26, 2011

Research Mystery

Around 2003, Brazilian chess master Hindemburg Melão, Jr., wrote an article for the online chess site, SuperAjedrez, featuring Joseph Henry Blackburne's famous defeat of the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+).

Today I can only trace the essay as far as an essay which is no longer available, which is unfortunate, as it contained some very interesting analytical and historical information, including [Note: my translation - RK]  
...Some sources indicate year of the game as 1868, others indicate 1888, and others indicate 1880. Some sources affirm that it was played in Manchester, others in London. Normally the name of the adversary is not given, having only "NN" or "Amateur", but in at least one source "Millner" is indicated as the name. Also it is not known if it was an individual game or part of a simultaneous display... [T]he game deserves to be cited as one of most beautiful pearls of blindfold Chess...
Although it is in conflict with the information given in Mr. Blackburne's Games at Chess (1899) – that the game in question was played "around 1880" – my preferred source for information on Amateur - Blackburne, London (see "Flaws" 1 & 2– the August 15, 1885 issue of the Brooklyn Chess Chronicle, edited by J.B. and E.M. Munoz – gives the year as 1885.

I would love to ask Senhor Melao about his sources, as he clearly has access to materials that I do not. (That would not be at all unexpected: Lt. S.A. Sorensen's seminal work on the Jerome Gambit, in the May 1877 issue of Nordisk Skaktidende, was subsequenly translated and reprinted around the chess world.)

For example, I have never seen the Blackburne game dated as having been played in 1868 – six years before Alonzo Wheeler Jerome published analysis of "his" opening in the Dubuque Chess Journal. Nor have I seen it reported as played in 1888 – the Brooklyn Chess Chronicle reported that it had been played "some months ago in London", highly suggestive of the year 1885.

As for the references to the game being played in Manchester and the naming of the Amateur as "Millner" – both were news to me as well. And: was it a blindfold game?

Is any reader familiar with the SuperAjedrez article?

Does anyone have acces to the Brazilian chess master, to pass on my questions? 

What a mystery!

Friday, October 16, 2009

Sources

Yesterday's post (see "A Question of Theory and Practice") referred to Hindemburg Melao, Jr.'s 2003 internet article at Superajadrez.com, with significant analysis of the famous Amateur - Blackburne Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) game. I would like to point out that at about the same time as Melao, Catalan Master Richard Guerrero Sanmarti wrote an article for Ajedrez en Madrid on the Blackburne game, with equally relevant analysis, some of which I'd like to share. [Be warned, my Spanish translation skills are poor.] Stranger - Blackburne London, 1880[sic] 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+?
Absolutely impressive! ... but totally incorrect! 4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ g6! ...[I]t seems evident that 6...Ke6 was somewhat dangerous... it was also possible for Black to choose simple 6th move answers: 6...Kf8! 7.Qxe5 d6; or 6...Ng6! 7.Qxe5 d6? ...To sacrifice a Rook, it was far better to do it with 7...Qe7! 8.Qxh8 Qxe4+ 9.Kd1 (9.Kf1 Qh4! 10.g3 (10.d4? Bxd4 threatening captures on f2 and to the White Queen on h8) 10...Qh3+ 11.Ke1 (11.Kg1 b5! -+ followed by Bb7! and the Bishop captures on g2) 11...Qe6+ 12.Kf1 (12.Kd1 Qg4+ 13.Ke1 Qe4+ 14.Kf1 with a decisive advantage for Black (14.Kd1 Qf3+! 15.Ke1 Bxf2+ 16.Kf1 Bxg3+ 17.Kg1 Qf2#) ) 12...Nf6! -+ and the unprotected White King can not be saved from Black's imminent attack) 9...Qxg2 10.Qxh7+ Kf8 11.Re1 d5! -+ and Black has a decisive attack when adding the Bishop on c8 and the Rook on a8. 8.Qxh8 Qh4 9.0-0! Nf6 10.c3? ... 10.Qd8! +/- was essential and White not only defends but obtains a clear advantage. The keys of the play are the attack on c7, and the pin of the Black Knight on f6 that cannot now be added to the attack; the "natural" 10.d3? also was losing after 10...Bh3! 11.Qxa8 ( or 11.Qxf6+ Kxf6! 12.gxh3 Qxh3 with a winning position) 11...Qg4 12.g3 Qf3 10...Ng4! -+ The brilliant romantic Englishman will execute the extraordinary combination that he prepared with 6...g6! 11.h3 ...after 11.Rd1 Qxf2+ 12.Kh1 Qg1+! 13.Rxg1 Nf2# 11...Bxf2+ 12.Kh1 And now comes the skillful play that makes Blackburne's sensational finish possible. Clearly if 12.Rxf2+ Qxf2+ 13.Kh1 Qf1# 12...Bf5! A fantastic move! 13.Qxa8 To eat or be eaten. 13.exf5 Rxh8 -+ with checkmate in a few moves. 13...Qxh3+! 14.gxh3 Bxe4 A really spectacular checkmate!