Jerome Gambit: Rashness

Finishing 10 - 0 in Round One (not as impressive as it looks, but including three Jerome Gambits), Group Six, I will be joined by two other group members - likely mancroft and WidowKoenig - in the next round.

I was gifted by a win on time in the following game, a bit of an unfair result given the rashness of my play.

perrypawnpusher - Squirty7

"Italian Game" tournament, Chess.com, 2026

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ 

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6 

7.Qd5+ Kf8 8.Qxc5+ d6 

There are 1,696 games in The Database with this position. White scores 60%. 

9.Qe3 Nf6

10.h4 

 An aggressive idea from "Jerome Gambit: Training Game #6". 

10...Be6 11. h5 Ne5 12. d4 Neg4 

White is spending a lot of time with his pawn moves.

In turn, Black has better development.

This being the Jerome Gambit, the position is about even.

13.Qe2 Qe7 14.f3 Nh6 

15.Bxh6 

To break up the pawns on Black's Kingside, but development with 15.Nc3 was better.

15...gxh6 16.Nc3 Bf7 17.g4 Black lost on time

What is going on? It is not clear. Are the White pawns dangerous, or only faking it? Luckily, these are questions I didn't need answered.

Jerome Gambit: Radically Declined

 

One of the most radical way to "decline" the Jerome Gambit (other than, say, 1...c5) might better be described as avoiding it: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nb4?

I have looked at this line previously, in "Out-Weird the Jerome Gambit" and "Rattling Around in My Brain (Not the Jerome)" but I occasionally check back, out of morbid curiosity.

The Database has 42 games with the line, with White, as expected, scoring 83%. The earliest example is an internet game from 2002, but I suspect that there are earlier examples out there.

Writ large, the lichess.org database has 45,000 (!) games with the line, with White scoring "only" 74%.

Why, oh why, would someone play 3...Nb4?

For that matter, why would someone play 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ ?

I suspect that a lot of the answers to both questions might be quite similar.

Jerome Gambit: MrArniX

Exploring YouTube, I found a Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) video by MrArnix titled "The Jerome Gambit: Crazy Checkmate in 14 Moves! ⚡♟️".

The game presented avoids both the over-exposed Amateur - Blackburne, London, 1885 and the runner up for that honor (see a short TikTok video on the Jerome Gambit by Razerchess), first seen, according to The Database, in blackburne - karmark, ChessWorld, 2007.

MrArniX notes

Since 9 Aug 2025, I’ve been dropping insane gambits ♞💥, epic miniatures 🎯🏆 & pro strategies 🧠✨. Beginners 🐣, enthusiasts 🎯, or future grandmasters 👑♟ – this is your chess playground! 🌟💥

Does the video's title sound familiar? It is probably a coincidence. Check out "Jerome Gambit: @thesilent checkmate" and "Jerome Gambit: Crazy Checkmate in 14 Moves! Redux".

Do check out MrArnix's site with his collection of videos.

Jerome Gambit: Back At Me (Part 2)

 

[continued from the previous post]

rffuse - perrypawnpusher

Chess.com, 2026

Playing against "my" opening...

21.Ra3 Qd5 22.Raf3 Re8 23.Qg5 

White's pieces are gathered on the Kingside, but have not yet put together an attack

23...Qe4 24.h4 Rd8 25.h5 Qa4 26.Ra3 Qe4 27.g4

White is not amused by Black's Queen's dancing; he has work to do. 

Things look scary for the second player, but I was shocked - after the game - to see that Stockfish 17.1 (33 ply) - rated the position as 7 1/3 pawns better for Black!

Indeed, fear has big eyes.

27...Qe2 28.Raf3 Rd2 

Even stronger was 28...Rc7 29.Qf5 (29.Kb1 Qxc2+ mates; 29.R3f2 Rxc2+ mates; 29...Ne4 mates) 29...Ne4 mates. 

Still, my move will do.

29.R3f2 

29...Rxc2+ 30.Kb1 Rxb2+ 31.Ka1 Qxf2

Taking the lazy way out, instead of 31...Ra2+ 32.Kb1 Qc4 33.Qe5 (33.Rb2 Rd7 mates; 33.Rxa2 Qxf1+ 34.Kb2 Rc7 and mates) 33...Qb3+ 34.Rb2 Rxb2+ 35.Qxb2 Qd3+ 36.Ka2 Qxf1 White wins.

Exchanging a Queen for two Rooks is still a good deal.

32.Rxf2 Rxf2 33.Qe5 Rd7 34.Qe6+ Kf8 35.Qe1 Rdd2 White resigned

There was no need to play out 36.Qc1 Ra2+ 37.Kb1 Rfb2+ 38.Qxb2 Rxb2+ 39.Kxb2 Nxg4 returning the two Rooks for the Queen and ending up with two connected, passed pawn (plus the extra piece)

Jerome Gambit: Back At Me (Part 1)

I received a challenge from rffuse at Chess.com. He wanted to play the Jerome Gambit against me.

That felt odd.

Here is how it went.

rffuse - perrypawnpusher

Chess.com, 2026

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ 

According to The Database, I have defended against the Jerome Gambit in 52 games, scoring 87%.

Compare that to the 500 Jerome Gambits I have played with White, scoring 82%.

Hmmmm..... 

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.d4 

Okay, I am 4 - 0 against this move. (Against 6.Qh5+ I am 11 - 3 - 1)

6...Bxd4 

I usually play 6...Qh4, based on earlier Jerome Gambit games going back (at least) to Sorensen - X, Denmark, 1888 (1-0, 27).

 I am not sure why I played this move.

7.Qxd4 d6 8.Bf4 Qe7 9.Nc3 Nf6

Black is better, with a piece for a pawn; but that never stopped me from playing White! 

10.O-O-O 

Nice. Alonzo Wheeler Jerome castled Queenside in at least 11 of his games.

10...Rf8 11.Bxe5 dxe5 12.Qc4+ 

To check the enemy King and prevent it from castling

12...Be6 

Okay, missed that.

13.Nd5 Bxd5 14.exd5 Qd6

Blockading the Queen pawn, and preventing any discovered checks. The same could be accomplished with a lesser piece, i.e. 14....Ne8 and 15...Nd6 

I need not have worried: 14...Kg8 15.d6+ Qf7 16.Qxf7+ Rxf7 17.Rhe1 cxd6 18.Rxd6 and Black is fine.

15.Rd3 Nd7

I am not sure what this move is all about, and the Knight is soon recalled

16.Rg3 Kg8 17.Rf1 Nf6 18.f4 Qxd5 

The alteranative, 18...exf4 19.Rxf4, is fine for Black.

19.Qxc7 Rf7 20.Qxe5 Qxa2 

Both Queens are getting their exercise.

I was pleased to be playing a Jerome Gambit where I had the extra piece, for a change.

[to be continued]

Jerome's Gambit Snacks!?

Wandering the internet I found... Jerome's Gambit snacks?

Wow!

This deserves further investigation.

jeromesgambitsnacks

Jerome’s Gambit™

Luxury chess snacks for thinkers, winners & players.

Checkmate-worthy chocolate creations.

Coming soon.

... 

more

• 0

What Am I Doing Here? (Part 3)

[continued from the previous post]

Continuing my latest adventure with the Noa Gambit, or the Monck Gambit.

perrypawnpusher - Zingowahnsinn

"Italian Game" tournament, Chess.com, 2026

 29.Ke3 Ke6 30.c4 Re5+ 31.Kd2 Nd6 32.Kc3 g6 33.b4 

The King probably should have gone to b4, and, maybe, the Rook to d2, before that.

33...Ne4+ 

Simplifying further, but sending the Rook behind enemy lines with 33...Re1 was to be considered.

34.Nxe4 Rxe4 35.Rd4 Re2

See the previous note.

36.Rd2 Re3+ 37.Kd4 Ra3 38.Kc5 Re3 39.Kxc6 Black resigned

White's King will help his Queenside pawns advance, while Black's King is cut off from the action.

I am going to have to take chessfriend Yury V. Bukayev's advice, and stop playing this sketchy opening.