Friday, September 18, 2026

A Reversed Reversed Jerome Gambit?!

                                   


I really was going to give the Busch-Gass Gambit a rest, but I ran into a video by Chess Pro @ChessPro912 (see "Jerome Gambit: Chess Pro" for an earlier mention on this blog, concerning the video "Jerome's Gambit Magic: Make Your Opponents Disappear") tantalizingly titled "Discover the POWER of Busch-Gass Gambit!".

It featured a game that got me scratching my head, so I took a deeper look.

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 

So far, as advertised: the Busch-Gass Gambit.

3.Bc4 Nf6 


As National Master Graif recommended, as I reported, in "Reversed Jerome Gambit (Part 3)"

4.d4 

Transposing to a Petroff Defense or Center Game. The position was seen as early as Puller, Arthur Giles - Horne, Benjamin Worthy, British Chess Association Congress, Cambridge, 1860 (1-0, 44)

4...exd4 5.c3 

Sharper was 5.e5.

5...Nxe4 6.Bxf7+ 


Stockfish 16.1 sees this move as about 1/2 pawn riskier for White than the Jerome Gambit.

Does White's Bishop sacrifice turn the game into a kind of reversed, reversed Jerome gambit?

6...Kxf7 7.Ne5+ Kg8 8.cxd4 


White does not have much for his sacrificed piece.

8...Qh4 

I suppose that Black hopes that this aggressive move ends the game quickly - and it does, but not in the expected manner.

9.O-O 

White is temporarily cowed, but this does not last long.

9...Bxd4

For the moment, both  players overlook the possibility of checkmate.

Necessary was the defensive withdrawal, 9...Qf6, for an even game.

10.Qb3+ 

Back on track.

10...d5 11.Qxd5+ Be6 12.Qxe6+ Kf8 13.Qf7 checkmate




Thursday, September 17, 2026

Reversed Jerome Gambit (Part 3)

                                                             


[continued from the previous post]

Wednesday, September 16, 2026

Reversed Jerome Gambit (Part 2)

 


[continued from the previous post]

The previous post looked at the Busch-Gass Gambit as a reversed Jerome Gambit.  The focus was on 3.Nxe5, which raised, for me, the questions
This is all well and good, but what about 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 3.Bc4 Bxf2!?+ or 3.Nc3 Bxf2+?

Very well. 

The earliest game in The Database with 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 3.Bc4 Bxf2!? features a player at redhotpawn.com who I have referred to, earlier, as "the King of Bxf7+" because of his use of that Bishop sacrifice in many openings, including, but certainly not limited to, double e-pawn lines. 

Dick Tracy - viejoasquerosos

RedHotPawn.com, 2006

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 3.Bc4 Bxf2+ 4.Kxf2 d6 5.c3 c6 6.d4 Nf6 7.Bg5 Nxe4+ 8.Ke3 Nxg5 9.Nxg5 Qxg5+ 10.Kf2 exd4 11.Re1+ Kd8 12.Kg1 d5 13.Qxd4 Bh3 14.g3 Nd7 15.Bd3 Kc7 16.a4 h5 17.Na3 h4 18.Qf4+ Qxf4 19.gxf4 f5 20.Re7 g5 21.Rf7 Rhf8 22.Rxf8 Rxf8 23.Re1 gxf4 24.b4 Rg8+ 25.Kh1 Bg2+ 0-1

The earliest 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 3.Nc3 Bxf2+ game in The Database is

Vega3 - Kronos 

HCL-B1474, PlayChess.de, 2002

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 3.Nc3 Bxf2+ 4.Kxf2 c6 5.Nxe5 Qf6+ 6.Qf3 Qxe5 7.d3 Qc5+ 8.Be3 Qe7 9.Ke2 Nf6 10.Bg5 h6 11.Bh4 d6 12.h3 Qe5 13.g4 g5 14.Bg3 Qe6 15.Kd2 Nbd7 16.Bg2 b5 17.a3 Bb7 18.Rhe1 O-O-O 19.Re2 h5 20.e5 dxe5 21.Qf5 Rde8 22.Rae1 hxg4 23.Qxe6 Rxe6 24.hxg4 Nxg4 25.Be4 Rf6 26.Bg2 Re6 27.Ne4 f6 28.Bf3 Nh6 29.b4 Nf5 30.Bg4 Nxg3 31.Nxg3 Rd6 32.Ne4 Rd4 33.Bxd7+ Kxd7 34.Nxf6+ Ke6 35.Ne4 Rg8 36.Nc5+ Kd5 37.Rxe5+ Kd6 38.Nxb7+ Kc7 39.Nc5 Rg4 40.Re7+ Kb6 1-0

There certainly must be earlier examples of reversed Jerome Gambits - and I will continue to search - but I have not yet found them.

(Of course, I then checked lichess.org. The site had 1.5 million games with 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 3.Bc4 Bxf2+. It had "only" 604,000 games with 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 3.Nc3 Bxf2+. Where to begin, where to begin...?)


Tuesday, September 15, 2026

Reversed Jerome Gambit (Part 1)

 


In a recent post, "Jerome Gambit: Oh, Never Mind...", I suggested

Maybe I need to work up a "reversed Jerome Gambit" 

Long-time Readers will have realized that at that point I was suffering from caffeine dificiency disorder

Of course I have taken a look at a "reversed Jerome Gambit."

I think that the first time that I mentioned "reversed" was in the post Jerome Gambit: Quick Finishes

Changing sides of the board, Jean_Kn plays a reversed Jerome Gambit, also know as the Busch-Gass Gambit or Chiodini's Gambit

Over time, that led to "Worth a Second Look... (Part 1)"

The opening 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 actually has a long pedigree. When J.H. Sarratt published his The Works of Damiano, Ruy-Lopez and Salvio on the Game of Chess in 1813, he noted Salvio's analysis of the line (from Il Puttino, altramente detto, il Cavaliero Errante, del Salvio, sopra el gioco de Scacchi, 1604), including the following (translated into modern algebraic notation)

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 3.Nxe5 Qe7 4.d4 Bb4+ (4...Bd6 5.f4 f7 6.Nc4 Qxe4+ 7.Kf2 Bxf4 8.Nc3 Qf5 9.Bd3 Qg5 10.Re1+; 4...d6 5.dxc4 Qxe5 6.cxd5 Qxe4+ 7.Be3 cxd6 8.Qxd6 Qxc2) 5.c3 Ba4 6.f3 f6 7.Nc4

Continuing in "Worth a Second Look... (Part 2)"

Rainer Schlenker refers to 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 (see "Worth a Second Look... (Part 1)") as the "Busch - Gass Gambit" in the May/June 1985 issue (pp. 69-71) of his magazine Randspringer.

He refers to analysis by Oskar Cordel in Führer durch die Schachtheorie (1888)

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 3.Nxe5 Qe7 4.d4 Bd6 (4...Bb6 5.Bc4!) 5.f4 f6 6.Nc4 Qxe4+ 7.Kf2 Bxf4 8.Nc3 Qf5 9.Bd3 Qg5 10.Re1+ Ne7 11.Kg1 Nbc6 12.Bxf4 Qxf4 13.Qh5+ Kf8 14.Re4 +/- / +-

and analysis included in Bilguer (1916)

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 3.Nxe5 Qe7 4.d4 Bd6 5.Nc3! Bxe5 6.Nd5 Qd6 7.dxe5 Qxe5 8.Bf4 Qxe4+ 9.Qd2

Schlenker, however, modifies the name that Bent Larsen gave to the line ("Busch-Gambit") in Larsen's Sharp Openings (in Danish) based on the game Baird - Busch, 15. Kongresses Deutchen Schachbundes, Nuremberg 1906. Sharp Openings included a portion of the game:

Baird,D - Busch 

Nuremberg, 1906

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 3.Nxe5 Nc6 4.Nf3 Qe7 5.Nc3 Nf6 6.d4 Nxe4 7.Nd5 Bb4+ 8.Bd2 Nxd2+ 9.Nxe7 Nxf3+ 10.Ke2 Nfxd4+ 11.Kd3 Bxe7 12.c3 Ne6 13.Kc2 0-0 14.g3 d5 15.Bd3 Rd8 16.f4 d4 17.f5 dxc3 18.fxe6 Nb4+ 19.Kxc3 Rxd3+ 20.Qxd3 Nxd3 21.exf7+ Kf8 22.Kxd3 Bf5+ 0-1

Schlenker adds the name "Gass" to the variation after the German master who had been playing the line in the 1970s and 1980s, and gives a few examples.

And, further in "Worth A Second Look...(Part 3)", where I wandered into Chiodini's Gambit
The most recent analysis of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 (see "Worth a Second Look (Part 1)" and "Worth a Second Look (Part 2)") is by NM Clyde Nakamura, in his very creative "The Search for Dragons & Mythical Chess Openings" column at Chessville. Nakamura refers to the line, after the additional 3.Nxe5 Nc6, as "Chiodini's Gambit" apparently so-named by a chessfriend-of-a-chessfriend. He gives earlier (1998) analysis by Stefano Vezzani and by Sverre Johnsen, and then gives a host of annotated games, including one by Busch and one by Gass.

For historical purposes, I can add that Otto Henshel, playing in the minor tournament of the 5th American Chess Congress of 1880, defended two games with 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5, against A. T. Tompkins and against David Graham Baird, although both games continued 3.Bc4 d6.  

This is all well and good, but what about 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Bc5 3.Bc4 Bxf2!?+ or 3.Nc3 Bxf2+

[to be continued]

Monday, September 14, 2026

Rubbernecking and the Face Palm Variation, Updated

 



I recently read on a lawyer's website what he referred to as "rubbernecking"

What is it about a car accident that makes people want to stop and stare? Do we have some morbid desire to experience suffering, as long as it’s through other people? 

Oh, my.

And, here I was planning to do an update on the infamous Face Palm Variation of the Jerome Gambit, 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Ng5+.

Call it rubbernecking.

I stumbled over the line in the early months of this blog (August, 2008), when, in "Carlos Azcarate Topping Ninja Knights T3" I reported the winner of a Jerome Gambit tournament at ChessWorld

The tournament winner uncorked the most surprising opening move of all, not once, but twice, when he followed the routine 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 with 5.Ng5+


While I await detailed analysis, it is possible to point out precedents, the earliest of which in my database is an internet blitz game from a decade ago, lar - babylyub (1/2-1/2, 27).

Back in 2015, when this blog was 7 years old, I wrote in PSA 2.0

The Database has 473 examples of 5.Ng5+, with White over all scoring 24%.

In 2016, in "Another Way to Sacrifice the Knight" I shared

5.Ng5+ 

I would like to attribute this move to a "mouse slip" or a lack of caffeine, but I notice that there are 507 games with 5.Ng5+ in The Database.

Odder, still, White scored 24% in those games.

In 2020, in "Jerome Gambit: The Face Palm Variation" I was more expansive

This line does not have a name that I am aware of [until I gave it one - RK]. It is based on a tactical shot that may be clever, but not convincing. (I gave a warning about a decade ago in the post "Public Service Announcment".)

The Database has 568 games with the line, with White scoring 23%. The earliest games that I have (6 losses) feature TiFoZi, at FICS, in 1999. [Obviously, I had forgotten lar - babylyub, internet, 1998 - RK] I will try to message him there, but, according to the site, the last time he visited was October 22, 2001.

I can understand that a Jerome Gambit player might try the line on a lark, especially at blitz or lightning time controls; I noticed Jerome regulars such as COMTIBoy, DragonTail, drumme, HauntedKnight, JKELSEY, majorminor, MyGameUMove, Petasluk, snthor, sTpny, superpippo, Teterow, thmavz, ZahariSokolov, and yorgos, have given it a try. [Add deusmach, Jagulep, ToFoZi and Bill Wall - RK ]

That brings us to today, when The Database has 854 games with the line, with White scoring 27%.

So, is 27% good or bad for White? Stockfish 16.1 (33 ply) sees Black as over a Rook ahead after capturing the Knight with 5...Qxg5

(Actually, if we look at only the games with 5...Qxg5 [in almost 1/3 of the games Black does not capture the Knight?!] White scores even worse, with 21%.)

Under what conditions is it a good idea to give your opponent (according to the computer) what amounts to "Rook odds"?

Again: is 27% good or bad?

I can't find the quote, but there was something about it not being so surprising that someone's dog sings so badly, but that it sings at all...

Happily, I can report that by comparison, today's Database shows White scoring almost twice as well -  53% - in the Jerome Gambit proper, 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.not-Ng5+.

Just in case you were ever thinking of trying the Face Palm.

Sunday, September 13, 2026

Only One Problem...

 


Well, I found out about "duck chess".

I already knew about "bughouse chess".

I was remembering the Stafford Gambit, the favorite of a chessfriend.

Yes, I was back at that very informal chess club today.

Only one problem: nobody else was there.

Well, actually, the room was completely full - of serious non-chessplayers, doing serious non-chess things.

I waited, but the chess guys didn't show up. Maybe they knew something that I didn't.

Kind of like offering the Jerome Gambit, 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+, and having your opponent decline with 4...Kf8.

Oh, well, maybe next time.

Saturday, September 12, 2026

Cheapo


 

The title of today's post is a word of caution to defenders - to beware of what the AI Copilot defines

In chess, a “cheapo” is slang for a simple, often crude tactical trick or swindle — usually a primitive trap — set to catch an inattentive, overconfident, or time‑pressed opponent, and sometimes to swindle a win or draw from a losing position 

So, I guess, I could also have used the word swindle.

Anyhow, the game I am going to share is a relative of the Jerome Gambit - the Noa or Monck Gambit. So far, I am 5 - 2 - 2 with it.

perrypawnpusher - NN 

Chess.com, 2026

1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nc6 3.Nf3 Nf6 

The Two Knights defense.

4.Nc3 

Can I get a transposition to the Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit with 4...Bc5 5.Bx7+ ?

4...Nxe4 

Not today.

Very well, you say No and I say Noa. 

5.Bxf7+ 

The Noa Gambit.

5...Kxf7 6.Nxe4 d5 7.Neg5+ Kg8 

8.d4 Bg4 9.h3 Bxf3 

After the game, I checked with lichess.org. It has 584 games with this position, with about 2/3 of them having the recapture I chose - with the Queen.

10.Qxf3 

I played this move because it has what the guys at the club used to call "cheapo potential".

10...Qf6 

Instead, 10...Qd7 keeps the game even.

11.Qxd5+ 

Black resigned