Looking at The Database today, I noticed that I had played 250 rated games with the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+).
My score was 83%, which I thought was pretty good.
Then I wondered: maybe I scored well because I simply played my refuted opening against weaker players...
So, I looked at my average rating for those games, and the average rating of my opponents, and it was true: my opponents were, generally, weaker.
By about 65 rating points.
That would mean that instead of playing equally-rated opponents and expecting to score 50%, I was playing slightly weaker opponents, and was expected to score about 60%.
Ooops!
With the Jerome Gambit I was still scoring 23% higher than expected.
I think I will keep playing the opening.
No comments:
Post a Comment