No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service

Although he finished in the top half of the standings, with a plus score, long time Jerome Gambit Gemeinde member Pete Banks ("blackburne") – still, to the best of my knowledge, the top-rated modern player to venture the Jerome Gambit in serious over-the-board games, risking his rating (and the ribbing of his mates) – did not seem, in the ChessWorld Jerome Gambit Thematic Tournament, to be at the top of his game.

Perhaps he was playing this one for fun, which would explain his sometimes "casual" approach to an opening which, for all of its off-beat style, still has a certain amount of "theory" to acknowledge.

The title of this post comes from signs placed at some retail establishements, suggesting that people who have taken a casual approach to attire need not enter.

In the following game, however, blackburne got seriously served.

blackburne - shm19cs
Jerome Gambit Thematic Tournament
ChessWorld, 2011

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Kf8 6.f4

A theoretical novelty (TN), but there is no need to add insult to injury and name it after the player of the White pieces, especially as there is already a Banks Variation in the Jerome.

6...Nxe5

Black immediately puts his finger on the problem with White's move.

7.fxe5 Qh4+

The game resembles a reversed Damiano Defense (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6 3.Nxe5 fxe5 4.Qh5+), although in this case it is the defending side that had sacrificed a piece.

8.g3 Qxe4+ 9.Qe2 Qxh1+ 10.Qf1+ Qxf1+ 11.Kxf1 d6

12.exd6 cxd6 13.c3 Bh3+ 14.Ke2 Nf6 15.d4 Re8+ 16.Kd3 Bb6 17.Bg5 Bf5+ 18.Kd2 Ne4+

The final indignity. White resigned.

Retrospective

I was looking through a number of the games in the nearly-finished ChessWorld Jerome Gambit Thematic Tournament when I was surprised by the following position from mckenna215 - blackburne

Never mind White's extra Queen – what was his King doing at h8?

I rolled back the game a number of moves, and looked at the position again, with Black to move.

It is clear, now, what happened in the game: Black's Queen chased the White King to safety at h8. But, is that all we can say? Let's roll the game forward...

25...Qa1+ 26.Kf2 Qb2+ 27.Kg3

White's King, feeling claustrophobic, heads for the wide open spaces. He could well have stayed closer to home with 27.Kf1 Qc1+ 28.Ke2 Qb2+ 29.Kd3 Qb1+ 30.Kd2 Qb2+ 31.Qc2 when his Queen's arrival would save the day.

27...Qxc3+ 28.Kf4

Now here Black played 28...Qxd4+, and the game eventually ended on a slip or a spite check with 29.Kg5 Qg4+ 30.Kf6 Qf4+ 31.Kg7 Qg5+ 32.Kh8 Qf6+ 33.exf6 Black resigned.

Had he found 28...Qd2+, the second player would have been able to make use of his light-squared Bishop and his "dark-squared" Queen to keep the enemy monarch from going further afield. One possible line might be 29.Kf3 Qd1+ 30.Ke3 Qe1+ 31.Kd3 Ba6+ when 32.Kc2 would allow Black to continue checking with 32...Qe2+, and 32.Nc4 would allow Black to win the Knight, e.g. 32...Qb1+, when his piece for White's extra pawn might well hold the draw.

To be fair to White, had he played 28.Kh4 instead, his King would have escaped: 28...Qxd4+ 29.Kg5 Qg4+ 30.Kf6 Qf4+ 31.Nf5. 

"I don't get it"

Part of the fun of preparing games for this blog is looking into them and uncovering the logic (or illogic) behind a plan or a series of moves by one player or the other. This can bring to light all kinds of "errors of thinking". It can also leave me scratching my head in wonder, murmuring "I don't get it." 

The following game features blackburne, the top over-the-board (not just online) Jerome Gambit player, and Haroldlee123, who scored two serious upsets in the Chess World Jerome Gambit Thematic Tournament. 

blackburne - Haroldlee123
Jerome Gambit Thematic Tournament
ChessWorld, 2011

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ g6

7.Qxe5 Bxf2+

I found 68 games in The Database with this move. White scored 67%.

8.Kxf2 Nf6

Most often Black has played 8...Qf6+, when "At the cost of exchanging a won game for one in which he is a pawn down, Black has reached a Queenless middlegame that is not what every Jerome Gambiteer wishes for." (See "Short and Unbecoming")

9.Qf4 d6 10.Rf1 Kg7 11.d4 h6 12.Kg1

Both sides have castled-by-hand.Black's next move was played too quickly and gets him in immediate danger.

12...Rf8 13.Qxh6+ Kf7 14.Qg5 Kg7 15.Qh6+ Kf7 16.Qg5

The games in this tournament were played with a time limit of 5 days per move, but there was nothing to prevent opponents from playing faster if they ran into each other online. That's what seems to be going on here. White is repeating the position for what reason? I don't get it. (Perhaps: psychology.) Certainly 16.Bg5 would have kept the heat on.

16...c6

Black is avoiding repeating the position (by 16...Kf7) for what reason? I don't get it. He is down two pawns and should be thrilled with a draw. Instead, the text tosses a piece.

17.e5 dxe5 18.dxe5 Ke6 19.exf6 Rxf6 20.Rxf6+

The endgame, a piece and a pawn up, will be pleasant. White could have played sharper with 20.Re1+ Kg7 21.Qh4, but why bother? Remember, each player had 28 games to contend with.

After Black's response there are a number of checkmating lines available, and White chooses one.

20...Ke7 21.Rxg6+ Black resigned

Favorite Checkmate



Haroldlee123 - klonka

 Here we have my favorite checkmate from the lingering Chess World Jerome Gambit Thematic Tournament.

White has just played 69.e7 checkmate.

He might just as well have played 69.Bh6#.

Promoting three pawns to Queens and sacrificing one would have been a bit too much: 69.d7 Ke7 70.f8/Q+ Kxe6 71.d8/Q Ke5 72.Qf5#

Worth the Wait

While I admit (and apologize) that the 2012 version of The Database [a free PGN collection of over 26,000 Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+), Blackburne Shilling Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4 4.Bxf7+), and Semi-Italian Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6 4.0-0/4.Nc3/4.d3 Bc5 5.Bxf7+) games; as well as games following the so-far-unnamed order 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Na5 4.Bxf7+] is still not complete, I think that it will be worth the wait.

Here is a game that I found in TD2012.

Wall,B - Merdiyev,F
Chess.com, 2010


1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6

The Semi-Italian Opening.

4.0-0 Bc5 5.Bxf7+

The Semi-Italian Jerome Gambit.

5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.d4

We have been looking at d2-d4 in the opening lately, and that's one reason why I chose this game. Has Bill Wall also played the alternative, 7.Qh5+ ? A quick look in The Database shows that he has.

7.Qh5+ Ng6 (7...Ke6 8.Qf5+ Kd6 9.d4 Bxd4 10.Rd1 Ke7 11.Rxd4 d6 12.Qf4 Nf6 13.Nc3 Qf8 14.b3 Be6 15.Nb5 Kd7 16.Qxe5 Ng4 17.Qg3 Qf6 18.Bb2 Rhf8 19.Rxd6+ cxd6 20.Bxf6 Rxf6 21.Qxd6+ Black resigned, Wall,B - Guest473534, PlayChess.com, 2011) 8.Qd5+ Ke8 9.Qxc5 d6 10.Qc4 Ne5 11.Qb3 Qe7 12.d4 Nc6 13.d5 Nd4 14.Qa4+ Bd7 15.Qxd4 Qe5 16.Qxe5+ dxe5 17.f4 exf4 18.Bxf4 c6 19.c4 Nf6 20.e5 Nh5 21.e6 Nxf4 22.exd7+ Kxd7 23.Rxf4 Black resigned, Wall,B - Castro,S, Chess.com, 2010

7...Bxd4 8.Qxd4 Ng6

Or 8...Qe7 9.f4 Nc6 10.Qd5+ Qe6 11.Qh5+ g6 12.Qf3 d6 13.f5 gxf5 14.exf5 Qf6 15.Nc3 Ne5 16.Qh5+ Kg7 17.Nd5 Qf7 18.Qxf7+ Kxf7 19.Nxc7 Rb8 20.Nb5 Ne7 21.Nxd6+ Kf6 22.Bf4 Bxf5 23.Rae1 N5g6 24.Nxf5 Nxf4 25.Nxe7 Kg5 26.Re5+ Kf6 27.Re4 Rhe8 28.Rfxf4+ Black resigned, Wall,B - Ratebabb, Chess.com, 2010;


8...Qf6 9.Be3 Ne7 10.Nc3 Rf8 11.Nb5 c6 12.Nc7 Rb8 13.f4 Nf3+ 14.Rxf3 Qxd4 15.Bxd4 Kg8 16.Bxa7 Black resigned, Wall,B - Foman, Chess.com,  2010.

9.Qc4+ Kf8

10.Nc3 c6 11.Be3 b5

This move is a bit frivolous, but not fatal.

12.Qb4+ N8e7 13.f4 a5

14.Qd6 Kf7 15.f5 Nf8 16.f6 Ne6

Perhaps Black was thinking that he could return his extra piece with 17.Qxe7+ Qxe7 18.fxe7+ Kxe7 and then try to hold on with material being even.

17.fxe7+ Black resigned

The discovered check, another theme that we have been exploring lately, allows White to win Black's Queen.

Counter-counter-counter-attack!?

A Jerome Gambit player starts off a game with 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 because he hopes to answer 3...Bc5 with 4.Bxf7+. What if Black counter-attacks with 3...Nd4, the Blackburne Shilling Gambit, instead? Well, White can counter-counter attack with 4.Bxf7+, anyhow. And if Black plans his own counter-counter-counter attack??


Wall,B - Creel,A
Chess.com, 2010


1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4

The Blackburne Shilling Gambit.

4.Bxf7+

The Blackburne Shilling Jerome Gambit.

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Ke8 6.Qh5+ g6 7.Nxg6 hxg6 8.Qxg6+

8...Ke7 9.Qg5+ Ke8

For the moment Black signals that he would be okay splitting the point. White, however, is not.

10.Qe5+ Ne6 11.Qxh8 Qg5

Now Black is thinking: counter-counter-counter attack!

12.0-0 Nf4 13.g3 Ne2+ 14.Kg2 Nf4+

Black's attacking plan has a hole in it.

15.Kh1 Qg4 16.f3

If, instead, White grabbed the Knight with 16.gxf4, then Black would have a draw after all with 16...Qf3+ 17.Kg1 Qg4+ etc, repeating the position.

Unfortunately, Black's best now is 16...Qh3, when 17.Qxh3 Nxh3 would leave White with a Rook and four pawns for two pieces. The approaching endgame makes those pawns extra valuable.

Black resigned

Piece Development vs Pawns

The following Jerome Gambit miniature, featuring long-time Jerome Gambit Gemeinde member Louis Morin (also known as "mrjoker") playing White, showcases Black developing all of his pieces, including his extra one, while his opponent gathers in pawns. The game ends abruptly in the face of a rather intimidating gathering of "Jerome pawns".

guest585 - guest983
blitz, 2 12, Internet Chess Club, 2001

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6

7.Qxc5 Qe7 8.Qc4+ d5 9.Qxd5+ Be6 10.Qxb7 Re8

11.d3 h6 12.Nc3 Nf6 13.Be3 Rhf8 14.0-0 c5

15.Qxe7+ Nxe7 16.Bxc5 Kg8 17.Bxa7 Ng6 18.f4

Black has completed his development and castled-by-hand. His extra Knight, however, is outweighed by White's 6 extra pawns.

Black resigned