As I mentioned last post ("Jerome Gambit: Educational (Part 2)")
In a couple of previous posts ("Jerome Gambit: Unbeatable Gambit!?" and "Jerome Gambit: Educational (Part 1)") I mentioned a YouTube video (again, thanks for the information, Mikka Eckkinen) featuring Canadian Grandmaster Aman Hambleton playing a couple of Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) games.
It turns out that the grandmaster played three Jeromes against his opponent, a FIDE master (although very close in Chess.com rating).
Here is a game that did not appear in the video. It is a 3-minute blitz game, and the time control alters plans a bit.
I mean no disrespect to the grandmaster by showing a loss with the Jerome Gambit - it can happen when you play a "disreputable" opening at high speed; and the game is still educational, especially the endgame.
KNVB - TampaChess
3 0 blitz, Chess.com, 2022
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+
4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Kf8
The Jerome Defense to the Jerome Gambit, introduced by Alonzo Wheeler Jerome in 1874, which TampaChess played in the previous game as well.
7.Qxe5 d6 8.Qg3 Nf6 9.Nc3 Kf7 10.d3 Rf8 11.Be3 Bxe3 12.Qxe3 Kg8 13.0-0 d5
Except for a few changes in move order, this game follows the path of the previous one, up to this point. It looks like TampaChess has reflected upon his previous 13...a6 (by transposition) and decided more actively to strike at White's pawn center.
White is counting on his Queen's activity to help even things despite the material imbalance (two pawns vs a Bishop).
The idea: the better placed Knight, a more centralized King, the Queenside pawn majority. It may not be enough to win, but it should not lose.