Wednesday, March 12, 2025

Jerome Gambit: Bishop's Opening, Boi Variation

 


1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Bc5

This opening is sometimes referred to as the Bishop's Opening, Boi variation, apparently named after Paolo Boi, a 16th century Italian chess player. 

Alas, the only Boi variation game featuring Boi that I have found, has him as a defender - and the game quickly transposes to a Giuoco Piano

Scovara - Boi, Paolo, Spain, 1575

1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Bc5 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.c3 Qe7 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 Qxe4+ 7.Be3 Bb4+ 8.Nc3 d5 9.Bd3 Qe7 10.h3 Nf6 11.Kf1 Kf8 12.g4 Kg8 13.Rh2 Bd6 14.Rg2 White resigned

Sacrificing the Bishop now with 3.Bxf7+, has been referred to as the Jerome Gambit by Gerald Abrahams (The Pan Book of Chess [1965], The Chess Mind [1951]), so I call it the Abrahams Jerome Gambit, in his honor.

Since we have been looking at "hybrid gambits" (see "Jerome Gambit: Two Hybrid Gambits [Parts 1 & 2]"), let me add another move to the line we are considering

3.b4

Referring to last year's post, "Jerome Gambit: A Bit Dizzy"

...1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Bc5 3.b4 has been called the Bishop's opening, wing gambit; the Bishop's opening, McDonnell's gambit; and the La Bourdonnais - Denker Gambit.

Attaching Alexander McDonnell's name to the line, however, requires that we look at his 24th match game against Louis Charles Mahe De La Bourdonnais, 1834 -  the game continued 3...Bxb4 4.f4, known as the McDonnell Double Gambit.

That is also the only game that I have found with La Bourdonnais' name.

Then, there is the similarity to the Evans Gambit

Arnold Denker - Arthur Randolph Shayne, Rochester, New York, 1945

1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Bc5 3.b4 Bxb4 4.c3 Bc5 5.d4 exd4 6.Nf3 Nf6 7.e5 Ne4 8.O-O Nxc3 9.Nxc3 dxc3 10.Bg5 Be7 11.Qd5 Rf8 12.Bf6 gxf6 13.exf6 Bxf6 14.Rfe1+ Be7 15.Ng5 c6 16.Nxf7 cxd5 17.Nd6 checkmate


 Further, the papachess has this to say

Bishop's Opening: McDonnell Gambit can be a tricky opening to face, but there are several ways to neutralize its effectiveness. The simplest approach is to decline the gambit with 3...Bb6, which gives Black a pawn advantage but allows white to retain control of the center.

Alternatively, Black can accept the gambit with 3...Bxb4 and then focus on defending their position accurately. White's early lead in development can be slowed down with moves such as ...Nc6 or ...d6, which aim to block white's bishop.

If white seems to be putting too much pressure on Black's position, Black can also choose to exchange pieces to relieve the pressure. This is especially effective if white has misplaced pieces or a weak pawn structure.

In sum, the key to countering Bishop's Opening: McDonnell Gambit is to maintain accurate play and avoid positional weaknesses. By doing so, Black can neutralize white's early aggression and gain the upper hand.

Tuesday, March 11, 2025

Jerome Gambit: Pillar to Post


According to the Cambridge dictionary, "If someone goes from pillar to post, they are forced to keep moving from one place to another"

Similarly to Black's King, in the following example.


Robov - Lalithjathin

15 10 rapid, lichess.org, 2024

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ 

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ke6 

7.f4 Ng6 8.f5+ 

Here, Black resigned, in Robov - joh4nnes, 15 10 rapid, lichess.org, 2023

8...Kf6 9.fxg6 

Or 9.d4 Bxd4 (9...Qe8 10.e5+ Ke7 11.Bg5+ Kf8 12.fxg6 Qxg6 13.Rf1+ Ke8 14.Qxg6+ hxg6 15.dxc5 Rxh2 16.Nc3 c6 17.O-O-O Rxg2 18.Bf4 g5 19.Be3 d5 20.Rh1 Bg4 21.Rde1 Bf5 22.Ne2 Ke7 23.b3 Nh6 24.Bxg5+ Rxg5 25.Nd4 Nf7 26.e6 Nd8 27.Re5 Be4 28.Rxg5 Bxh1 29.Rxg7+ Kf6 30.Rf7+ Nxf7 31.exf7 Kxf7 32.Nf5 Rg8 33.Nh6+ Kg7 34.Nxg8 Kxg8 35.a4 a5 36.c3 Kf7 37.Kd2 Ke6 38.Ke3 Ke5 39.Kd2 Be4 40.Kc1 Kf4 41.Kd2 Bb1 42.Kc1 Be4 43.Kd2 Kf3 44.Kc1 Ke3 45.Kb2 Kd3 46.c4 Kd4 47.Ka3 Kxc5 48.Kb2 dxc4 49.bxc4 Kxc4 50.Ka3 b5 51.axb5 cxb5 52.Kb2 b4 53.Ka1 Bd5 54.Kb2 a4 55.Kc2 a3 56.Kb1 b3 57.Ka1 Be6 58.Kb1 Bd5 59.Ka1 Kc3 60.Kb1 a2+ 61.Ka1 b2 checkmate, Robov - Saske_10, 15 10 rapid, lichess.org, 2023) 10.Bg5+ Ke5 11.Bxd8 Black resignedRobov - NecropoliX, 15 10 rapid, lichess.org, 2023. 

9...Qe8 

To pin the advanced g-pawn.

Alternately

9...Bb6 10.d3 Ne7 11.Rf1+ Ke6 12.Nc3 hxg6 13.Qg4+ Kd6 14.Bf4+ Kc6 15.Qf3 d6 16.O-O-O Rh4 17.d4 Bg4 18.d5+ Kd7 19.Qg3 Ng8 20.Rde1 g5 21.Bd2 Bc5 22.e5 b6 23.Ne4 Kc8 24.Nxg5 Rh6 25.Qxg4+ Kb7 26.Nf7 Qh4 27.Nxh6 Qd8 28.Nf7 Qe7 29.Bg5 Qe8 30.exd6 Qb8 31.d7 Nf6 32.Bxf6 gxf6 33.d8=Q Qxd8 34.Nxd8+ Rxd8 35.Rxf6 Ra8 36.Qf4 Rd8 37.Qf3 Rc8 38.d6+ Kb8 39.Rf8 Rxf8 40.Qxf8+ Kb7 41.d7 Bxf8 42.d8=Q Bh6+ 43.Kb1 a5 44.Qd5+ c6 45.Qd7+ Kb8 46.Qxc6 Bf8 47.Qxb6+ Kc8 48.Qc6+ Kd8 49.Qf6+ Be7 50.Qxe7+ Kc8 51.Rf1 Kb8 52.Rf8 checkmate, Robov - Margiris_Zmuida, 15 10 rapid, lichess.org, 2023; and

9...d6 10.Rf1+ Ke7 11.d3 Nf6 12.Bg5 hxg6 13.Bxf6+ gxf6 14.Qf3 Bd4 15.c3 Be5 16.d4 f5 17.dxe5 dxe5 18.exf5 Bxf5 19.Nd2 Rxh2 20.O-O-O Rh8 21.Nc4 Qg8 22.Nxe5 Rh4 23.Qg3 g5 24.Nf3 Rg4 25.Qxc7+ Kf6 26.Rd6+ Be6 27.Nd4+ Ke5 28.Rxe6+ Kd5 29.Rf5 checkmate, Robov - Arvin-Y, 15 10 rapid, lichess.org, 2024 

10.Rf1+ Ke6 11.Qf5+ Kd6 12.Qd5+ Ke7 Black resigned


If now 13.Qxc5+, then 13...Kd8 would be met by 14.Rf8, while 13...d6 would be met by 14.Rf7+ and 13...Ke6 would be met by 14.d4 d6 15.Qxc7 with threats that will win a Queen for a Rook.


Monday, March 10, 2025

Jerome Gambit: Again, The Deadly f-File


In the following game, Black might have mistakenly figured - in a 60-second game, there is not a lot of time for figuring - that his 7th move threat against White's King was deadly.

With a little more time, he might have noticed that it allowed White to proceed with deadly intent.

The battle over the f-file was part of the skirmishing. 


angelcamina - piratekri

1 0 bullet, lichess.org, 2025

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7

5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Kf8 7.Qxe5 Qf6 

Sometimes Black's defense includes placing his Queen at f6, but not now. It is the kind of thing that can happen when you have only 60 seconds to complete your game.

This position has been reached 26 times in The Database, with White scoring 73%. The earliest example The Database has is MrJoker - Ronint, 2 12 blitz, Internet Chess Club, 2012 (1-0, 8).

White now captures a piece and has the benefits of the Jerome Gambit while being two pawns ahead, now two pieces behind.

8.Qxc5+ d6 9.Qe3 

For the next few moves, White will focus on center control.

9...Be6 10.d4 Nh6 11.O-O Qe7 12.f4 g6 

Black expects f4-f5 at some point - with threats along the f-file as well as to the Knight on h6 - and defends against it.

13.Qf2

More preparation and more pressure. Instead, 13.f5 was already playable. 

13...Kg7 14.Qg3 

Pinning the g-pawn and facing the enemy King.

14...Rhf8 15.Nc3 Rf7 16.Bd2 Raf8 

All eyes are on the f5 square.

17.f5 Bd7 

Saving the Bishop. He probably should have considered something like 17...Nxf5 18.exf5 Bxf5. In any event, Black is worse.

18.Rae1 a5 

Okay, all is in readiness for Black. What does White have?

19.fxg6 hxg6 20.Rxf7+ Rxf7 

Things seem to have settled down. Not so.

21.Nd5 Qf8 22.Qh4 c6 

Overlooking something. Black will now lose his Knight, then his Queen, and then be checkmated.

23.Bxh6+ Kg8 24.Bxf8 Rxf8 25.Ne7+ Kf7 26.Rf1+ Kg7 27.Rxf8 Kxf8 28.Nxg6+ Kg7 

29.Qg5 Kf7 30.h4 Kg7 31.h5 Kh7 32.Nf4 Be8 33.h6 Bf7 34.Qg7 checkmate




Sunday, March 9, 2025

Jerome Gambit: Two Hybrid Gambits (Part 2)

 


The following game illustrates the Jerome Evans Gambit.


Wall, Bill - Guest5570343

PlayChess.com, 2018

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ 

4...Kxf7 5.b4 Bb6 

Or 5...Bxb4 6.c3 Be7 7.Qb3+ Kf8 8.O-O Nf6 9.Re1 b6 10.d4 d6 11.Nbd2 Bd7 12.Nc4 Na5 13.Nxa5 bxa5 14.dxe5 Rb8 15.exf6 Rxb3 16.fxe7+ Qxe7 17.axb3 Qf6 18.Rxa5 Qxc3 19.Rxa7 Ke7 20.e5 dxe5 21.Bg5+ Kd6 22.Rd1+ Kc6 23.Rc1 Black resigned, Wall,B - Guest3166817, PlayChess.com 2018; or

5... Bxf2+ 6.Kxf2 Nf6 7.Rf1 Nxe4+ 8.Kg1 Rf8 9.b5 Kg8 10. bxc6 dxc6 11.d3 Nc5 12.Ba3 b6 13.Qe1 Bg4 14.Nbd2 Bxf3 15.Nxf3 Rxf3 16.Rxf3 Qd4+ 17.Kh1 Re8 18.Bxc5 bxc5 19.c3 Qd5 20.Qf2 e4 21.Re1 h6 22.Rxe4 Rxe4 23.dxe4 Qd1+ 24.Qf1 Qc2 25.Rf8+ Kh7 26.Qf5+ g6 27.Qf7 checkmate, Wall,B - WNXR, FICS, 2010 

6.b5 Nd4 7.Nxe5+ Ke8 8.Qh5+ 

8...g6 9.Nxg6 hxg6 10.Qxh8 Nxc2+ 11.Kd1 Nxa1 

12.Qxg8+ Ke7 13.Qg7+ Ke8 14.Qxg6+ Kf8 15.d4 

15...Bxd4 16.Bh6+ Ke7 17.Bg5+ Black resigned



Saturday, March 8, 2025

Jerome Gambit: Two Hybrid Gambits (Part 1)

 


As early as Charlick,H - Holloway,A, Australia, 1877 (1-0, 76), a few adventurous chess  players have combined the Evans Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc4 4.b4) with the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+).

See "The Evans Jerome Gambit" and "Exploring the Evans Jerome Gambit" for a couple of posts on the topic.

The Evans Jerome Gambit is 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc4 4.b4 Bxb4 (or 4...Bb6 or 4...Be7) 5.Bxf7+ (or 5.c3 Bb6 6.Bxf7+ or 5.c3 Bc5 6.bxf7+ or 5.c3 Be7 6.Bxf7+ or 5.c3 Ba5 6.Bxf7+).  

The Jerome Evans Gambit is 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.b4.

lichess.org has almost 1400 game examples.

In the following games, Bill Wall experiences a few light-hearted Evans Jerome Gambits.


Wall, Bill - Goblin

internet, 2004

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.b4 

4...Bd4 

Also:

4...Nxb4 5.Bxf7+ Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Kf8 7.O-O d6 8.Nf3 Bg4 9.d4 Bb6 10.c3 Nc6 11.h3 Bh5 12.Nbd2 Nf6 13.Re1 Qd7 14.e5 dxe5 15.dxe5 Black resigned, Wall,B - Benitez,H, internet, 2010;

4...Nd4 5.Bxf7+ Kxf7 6.bxc5 Nf6 7.Nxe5+ Ke8 8.Bb2 d6 9.Bxd4 dxe5 10.Bxe5 Nxe4 11.Qe2 Qd5 12.d4 Rf8 13.f3 Bg4 14.Qxe4 Qxe4+ 15.fxe4 Black resigned, Wall,B - Deadbird, internet, 2010; and

4...Bb6 5.Bxf7+ Kxf7 6.b5 Bxf2+ 7.Kxf2 Nd4 8.Nxe5+ Kf8 9.Nf3 Qf6 10.Bb2 Black resigned, Wall,B - Disco, internet, 2010. 

5.c3 Bb6 6.Bxf7+ 

6...Kxf7 7.b5 Nce7 8.Nxe5+ Ke8 

9.Qh5+ g6 10.Qf3 d6 11.Qf7 checkmate







Friday, March 7, 2025

Jerome Gambit: Merapi

Looking further at the Jerome Gambit line 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.a3, (see "Jerome Gambit: Counting Up the Numbers [Part 2]"), The Database has 32 game examples, with the earliest two played in 2002.

Merapi - tvc

2 0 lightning, FICS, 2002

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.a3 Nf6 6.b4 Bb6 7.Qe2 d6 8.Qc4+ Kf8 9.d4 Nxd4 10.Ng5 Qe7 11.Nf7 Qxf7 12.Qc3 Nc6 13.Qf3 Bd4 14.c3 Bb6 15.Rg1 Bg4 16.Qg3 Qg6 17.Nd2 Nh5 18.Qh4 Nf4 19.a4 a5 20.bxa5 Bxa5 21.Ra2 Bxc3 22.a5 Rxa5 23.Rxa5 Bxa5 24.Bb2 Nd3+ 25.Kf1 Nxb2 26.Nb3 Bc3 27.f4 Nd4 28.Qd8+ Qe8 29.Qxc7 Black lost on time


Merapi - GCH

5 0 blitz, FICS, 2002

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.a3 Nf6 6.b4 Bd6 7.Qe2 Re8 8.Qc4+ Kf8 9.d4 exd4 10.e5 Bxe5 11.Qc5+ Bd6+ 12.Ne5 Bxc5 13.f4 Nxe5 14.bxc5 Nd3+ 15.Kd2 Nxc5 16.Bb2 Re3 17.Bxd4 Re4 18.Bxc5+ Kg8 19.f5 d6 20.Kd3 Bxf5 21.Bd4 Re1+ 22.Kc4 Rxh1 23.a4 Be6+ 24.Kd3 Bf5+ 25.Ke2 Bxc2 26.a5 Qe7+ 27.Kf3 Qe4+ 28.Kf2 Qxd4+ 29.Kf3 Qxa1 30.Nd2 Be4+ 31.Nxe4 Nxe4 32.Kxe4 Re8+ 33.Kd5 Qxa5+ 34.Kc4 Qa4+ 35.Kd3 Qb4 36.g3 a5 37.h4 a4 38.Kc2 a3 39.Kd3 a2 40.g4 a1=Q White resigned


What I found interesting, when I checked for more information about Merapi at FICS, was the note

 1: Hello! I am a Java Chess Engine.

 2: Running on a PIII 128Mb 800Mhz

 3: MicroMaster is operating me.

 4: Todo list:

 5: create an opening book


Thursday, March 6, 2025

Jerome Gambit: Counting Up the Numbers (Part 2)



In the previous post (see "Jerome Gambit: Counting Up the Numbers [Part 1]") we looked at the massive collection of games at the lichess.org site and saw how some Jerome Gambit lines - accepted and declined - fared in club level play.

What does the computer engine Stockfish 16.1 think of all of this?

Well, for starters, in evaluating 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ it does not place 4.Bxf7+ in the top 25 fourth-move choices for White.   

Further, at 36 ply depth of evaluation, it sees 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ as about 2 3/4 pawn better for Black.

(New Readers, please do not panic. The Jerome Gambit is considered by masters to be disreputable - if still fun to play in certain circumstances. Club players count on the considerable "shock and awe" chaos it engenders to even the odds.) 

White is happier if the Bishop is not accepted, as 4...Kf8 is about 4 3/4 pawns better for him than 4...Kxf7, and 4...Ke7 is about 5 1/4 pawns better for him than 4...Kxf7  (31 ply).

Clearly the Jerome Gambit accepted lines are the ones that give the first player the greatest challenge.

At 36 ply, the popular 5.Nxe5+ is rated as about 3 pawns better for Black, as opposed to 5.O-O, which is rated as about 3 1/8 pawns better for Black.

Interestingly, 5.b4 is rated as about 3 1/3 pawns better for Black, while 5.Nc3 and 5.a3 are rated slightly even more favorable for the second player.

5.d4 is assessed as about 3 1/2 pawns better for Black, as is 5.c3. 

Apparently, according to the computer, White should smile if his Bishop is declined, and bear down if it is not, putting his effort into 5.Nxe5+, although 5.O-O, 5.b4, 5.Nc3, 5.a3, 5.d4 and 5.c3 are are not evaluated as much worse for him.

Clearly the Evans Jerome Gambit - 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.b4 - needs another look; as does the counter-intuitive 5.a3, first mentioned in September 2008's "A Closer Look (Part I)" and in the games panga74 - vlad-tepes, GameKnot.com, 2008 (1-0, 16) and (1-0, 31).

It is also worth mentioning "More Russian Home Cooking" from a dozen years ago, where Yury V. Bukayev noted

I have the following new present for you! It's my discovery! 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Nc3 h6 5.a3 (White has the auxiliary threat: 6.b4.) 5...Nd4? 6.Bf7!! White has a very strong attack! (6.Ne5?! Qg5!-+; after 6.Na4 or 6.b4 black can play 6...Bd6! without fast white's winning.) If you agree, you may call it as "Bukayev GP Jerome counter gambit", where "GP" is the well-known words: "giuoco piano".