Bill Wall recently sent me a few more of his Jerome Gambits. As he said, some are good, some are bad. None are quite as outrageous as the following.
Wall, Bill - Neilson, Criag
Florida, USA, 2017
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+
This appears to be an over-the-board game, which already makes it very interesting.
4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+
Interesting. Bill moves away from his favorite 6.d4.
6...g6 7.Qxe5 Qe7 8.Qxh8
Wow! Into the mouth of the beast!
One of the many reasons the Jerome Gambit is considered "unplayable" is Whistler's Defense (7...Qe7!). The Rook is supposed to be untouchable.
Not for Bill Wall. "Danger" is his midde name. He considers things like the Pamplona bull run to be a casual stroll down some interesting avenues.
After 8...Qf6 the game did not last long: 9.Qxh7+ Kf8 10.O-O Black resigned, Wall,B - Sepoli, Chess.com, 2010.
The alternative, 9.Kd1, was seen in Jerome,A-Whistler,G, correspondence, 1876 (0-1, 15) - but also in Wall,B - Mathieubuntu, FICS, 2011 (1/2-1/2, 14).
9...Nf6 10.d3 Qd4
This looks like an improvement over 10...Qf5 in Jerome,A - Norton,D, correspondence, 1876 (1/2-1/2, 20).
11.Be3 Qxb2 12.Bxc5 Qxa1
It looks like things will come down to which King is the most vulnerable.
13.Qf8+ Ke6 14.Qe7+ Kf5 15.Ke2 Qe5+ 16.Qxe5+ Kxe5
Very interesting. Is Black for choice because his King is better developed? Or will the blocked-in-light-squared-Bishop-blocking-the-Rook theme give White an edge?
17.Re1 d6 18.Kf3+ Kf5 19.Bd4 Kg5
A dangerous slip.
20.h4+ Kf5 21.Re7 Nd5