The following Blackburne Shilling Jerome Gambit is a good example of the defender over-reaching.
First, rather than play a regular Italian Game, he tries the Blackburne Shilling Gambit.
Then, he underestimates the Jerome Gambit version of the BSG.
Finally, he makes a grab for a "free" Rook that turns out to be anything but free.
It cannot be much of a surprise that he lasts an unlucky 13 moves.
JefferyLu1 - Andymurray2811
3 0 blitz, lichess.org, 2021
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4
What Black is really hoping is that White will play 4.Nxe5, so he can respond with 4...Qg5 and complications. In a 3-minute game, that just might work.
4.Bxf7+
Applying the Jerome remedy, however: the Blackburne Shilling Jerome Gambit.
4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Ke8 6.Qh5+ g6 7.Nxg6 hxg6 8.Qxg6+
Declining the Rook - he could have tried entering the wild position after 8.Qxh8 Nxc2+ 9.Kc1 Nxa8 10.Qxg8 Qg5.
White must have something planned. Black should be wary.
8...Ke7 9.d3 Nxc2+
A free Rook!
Black is much more interested in being a Rook and two pieces up than in exploring the more reasonable 9...Ne6 10.Bg5+ Nxg5 11.Qxg5+ Nf6 12.e5 Kf7 13.exf6 d5 when White would wind up with 3 or 4 pawns for his sacrificed piece.
10.Kd1 Nxa1
I don't know that White would be interested in a draw. I have seen in many club games that the extra pawns are at least equal to the enemy's extra piece, despite what computers tend to say.
11.Bg5+ Nf6 12.Qxf6+ Ke8 13.Qg6 checkmate
No comments:
Post a Comment