Yesterday's post, "Special Delivery From Russia", featured a game between Philidor 1792 and Endeavornick, where, at the end, I suggested that Black might have played on, to investigate the drawing possibilities of a Bishops-of-opposite-colors endgame.
Interestingly enough, the following position, with Philidor 1792 as White to move, is from another game between the two same opponents, although I do not know if it was played earlier or later.
Here, too, White's advantage is an isolated c-pawn.
The game should be drawn with proper play.
Then, again, the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) should be won for Black with proper play, too.
51.Bh2 Kc6 52.Kd4 Bf5
Unthinkable. Clearly, time must have been very, very short.
53.Ke5
Ditto. Instead, 53.g8/Q leads to a forced mate.
However, here either Black resigned or Black lost on time, before he could level the game with 53...Bh7.
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ ...and related lines
(risky/nonrisky lines, tactics & psychology for fast, exciting play)
Showing posts with label Endeavornick. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Endeavornick. Show all posts
Friday, June 29, 2012
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Special Delivery from Russia
I have recently received a whole new selection of Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc3 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) games from Philidor1792 (aka Филидор1792), whose earlier contributions (see "Where Do Ideas Come From?" Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) were good for a lot of new thinking.
This first game is a reminder to the defender of the old saying "Act in haste, repent at leisure."
Филидор1792 (1932) - Endeavornick (1934)
Internet online game, blitz, 2012
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Nc3 Bc5 5.Bxf7+
The Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit.
5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.d4 Bb4
How much thought did Black put into this move?
Was he simply taking one piece away from the pawn fork?
Was he setting up a pin on the Knight on c3?
8.dxe5 Nxe4 9.Qd5+ Black resigned
My guess is that White's 9th move surprised Black, and hence the resignation. A more phlegmatic opponent might have hung around and seen if 9...Ke8 10.Qxe4 Bxc3+ 11.bxc3 d5 12.exd6 Qxd6 was worth some attention, as White's advantage would have been one doubled, isolated pawn; and a Bishops-of-opposite-colors endgame might develop.
On the other hand, maybe it was more fun to just set up the pieces again!
This first game is a reminder to the defender of the old saying "Act in haste, repent at leisure."
Филидор1792 (1932) - Endeavornick (1934)
Internet online game, blitz, 2012
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Nc3 Bc5 5.Bxf7+
The Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit.
5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.d4 Bb4
How much thought did Black put into this move?
Was he simply taking one piece away from the pawn fork?
Was he setting up a pin on the Knight on c3?
8.dxe5 Nxe4 9.Qd5+ Black resigned
My guess is that White's 9th move surprised Black, and hence the resignation. A more phlegmatic opponent might have hung around and seen if 9...Ke8 10.Qxe4 Bxc3+ 11.bxc3 d5 12.exd6 Qxd6 was worth some attention, as White's advantage would have been one doubled, isolated pawn; and a Bishops-of-opposite-colors endgame might develop.
On the other hand, maybe it was more fun to just set up the pieces again!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)