Jerome-Knight Gambit

Chessfriend Yury Bukayev recently referred me to the France-Echecs.com website, to a discussion that took place earlier in the year, regarding, in part, the game Millet,C - Sénéchaud,D, Rochefort, 1995 - most recently covered in the "Unorthodox Openings Newsletter", issue #33, which was mentioned in the last blog post.

In addition, in the France-Echecs.com article there are three games presented with the opening moves 1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.Bxf7+, along with the suggested name "the Jerome-Knight gambit".

A quick look at The Database shows only 6 examples of the Jerome-Kight gambit (not surprising, as I have not specifically collected the line), including an online ICC blitz game by American GM Larry Christiansen ("Here, have a Bishop...") and three games recently discovered at GameKnot.com.

While Readers check out France-Echecs.com, I will see what other games I can gather.

Dany Sénéchaud

French chess player, openings explorer and author - Emil Joseph Diemer (1908-1990): missionnaire des échecs acrobatiques - Dany Sénéchaud sent the following game, which opens up more understanding of Bxf7+ in the double e-pawn openings and gives a possible contribution to the lineage of the Jerome Gambit.

Millet,C - Sénéchaud,D

Rochefort, 1995

(notes by Sénéchaud, with additions)

1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Bc5 3.c3 Nc6!!?

3...Nf6 4.d4 exd4 5.e5 d5 

4.d4! exd4 5.Bxf7+ 

The position after 4 moves, and this sacrifice - reminiscent of the Abrahams Jerome Gambit - is rare, although it goes back at least as far as Philidor, who thought it playable. Could this have been one of the early influences that led Alonzo Wheeler Jerome to his Gambit?? For other ideas, see "Proto-Jerome Gambits?" Part 1 and Part 2 as well as "Godfather of the Jerome Gambit" Parts i, ii, iii and endnote. - Rick

5...Kxf7

Of course, someone had to try declining the sacrifice, although that can hardly be recommended: 5...Kf8 6.Bxg8 Rxg8 7.Nf3 h6 8.cxd4 Bb4+ 9.Bd2 Qe7 10.0-0 Qxe4 11.Bxb4+ Nxb4 12.Qb3 Nc2 13.Ne5 d5 14.Nd2 Qf5 15.g4 Qh7 16.Qxd5 g5 17.Qd8+ Kg7 18.Qxc7+ Black resigned, Wassilieff,H - Akadegawa,K, email 2000 - Rick 

6.Qh5+ 

6...Kf8 7.Qxc5+ d6

Also seen: 7...Qe7 8.Qxe7+ Ngxe7 9.Ne2 d5 10.exd5 Nxd5 11.Nxd4 Nxd4 12.cxd4 Nb4 13.Na3 Nd3+ 14.Ke2 Bf5 15.Rd1 Re8+ 16.Kf1 c6 17.b3 Kf7 18.Be3 Rd8 19.Ke2 Nb4 20.Nc4 Rhe8 21.Ne5+ Kf8 22.a3 Nc2 23.Ra2 c5 24.g4 Nxe3 25.fxe3 Rxe5 26.gxf5 cxd4 27.Rd3 Rde8 28.e4 Rxe4+ 29.Kf3 Re3+ 30.Rxe3 Rxe3+ 31.Kf4 Rxb3 32.Rc2 Rc3 33.Rb2 b6 34.a4 d3 35.Ke3 Rc5 36.Kxd3 Rxf5 37.Rc2 g5 38.Rc8+ Kg7 39.Kc4 h5 40.Rc7+ Rf7 White resigned, Fekete,J - Fenyes,G, Goed op 1st, 2004 - Rick 

8.Qg5

White has tried two alternatives:

8.Qc4 Qe7 9.f3 Nf6 10.cxd4 d5 11.Qc3 dxe4 12.f4 Nd5 13.Qb3 Ndb4 14.Be3 Be6 15.Qc3 Nd5 16.Qd2 Ncb4 17.Kd1 Nd3 18.b3 Rd8 19.Ne2 c5 20.Nbc3 c4 21.bxc4 Nb2+ 22.Kc2 Nxc4 23.Nxd5 Bxd5 24.Qc1 Qb4 25.Nc3 Rc8 26.Rb1 Na3+ 27.Kd2 Nxb1+ 28.Qxb1 Qxc3+ 29.Ke2 Qc2+ 30.Bd2 Qxb1 31.Rxb1 Kf7 32.Ke3 Rc2 33.Rb5 Rd8 34.a4 Ra2 35.a5 Ra3+ 36.Kf2 Rd3 37.Be3 Rd7 38.f5 Rc3 39.Bd2 Rc4 40.Ke3 Kf6 41.Kf4 Rc2 42.Be1 Rxg2 43.Bh4+ Kf7 44.Bg3 Rd2 45.Ke5 Bc6 46.Rb4 e3 47.Bf4 Rd3 White resigned, Ramakrishna, G - Guo Yuth, Belconnen op, 2005; and 

8.Qb5 Qe8 9.f3 Nge7 10.Ne2 dxc3 11.Nbxc3 Nd8 12.Qd3 Kf7 13.f4 Qd7 14.0-0 Re8 15.f5 Nec6 16.Bf4 a5 17.Rad1 Ra6 18.Qf3 h5 19.Nd5 Kg8 20.Nxc7 Black resigned, Morrison,J - Storr Best,J, Bromley prelim C, 1925 - Rick

8...Nf6 9.f3 h6 10.Qg3 dxc3 11.bxc3!?

Or 11.Nxc3 Nb4 12.Kd1.

11...Ne5 !!? 12.f4 Nxe4 13.Qe3 Nf2 !!? 14.fxe5 Nxh1 15.Qf3+?

Instead, 15.Nf3 &16.Ba3.

15...Kg8 16.g3 dxe5 17.Qxh1 Bg4 18.Nd2 e4 19.Qxe4 Qd7 20.Qd4 Re8+

21.Kf2 Qf5+ 22.Ndf3 Kh7 23.Bf4 Rhf8 24.Qd1 g5 25.Be3
Qe4 26.Qb1 Bxf3 White resigned