Sometimes the recipient of a gambit is skeptical. Free material? Why not grab all I can get?? The gamiteer adds: It will cost you. In the following game Black happily receives a Bishop and then a pawn. When offered a Knight, he scarcely resists the temptation. White then shows that his "generosity" should have been taken seriously, as well. Philidor 1792 - NN 2015 1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.Bxf7+ Kxf7 4.Nf3 Nxe4 5.Nc3
You might think that there are a whole lot of notes attached to this 3-minute game, but they're all a lot of fun, in another fun opening outing from Philidor 1792. Philidor 1792 - guest564 3 0 blitz, www.bereg.ru, 2013
1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nxe4
Instead, 4.Nc3 would lead to the Boden-Kieseritsky Gambit (suggested by Lionel Kieseritzky in 1848, analyzed by Samuel Boden in his Popular Introduction to Chess in 1851). I have managed to scrape up a few games and posts with this line, starting with "Wasn't Me!" and " 'I nearly smacked him on the back of the head!' ".
4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+
White made a feint towards the Boden-Kieseritsky Gambit in the entertaining Jirotka,S - Super Expert, 1990: 5.Nc3 Nxc3 6.Nxe5+ Ke6 7.Qf3 Kxe5 8.O-O Nd5 9.c4 Nf6 (now mate follows) 10.Re1+ Kd4 11.a4 Bb4 12.Qe3+ Kxc4 13.d3+ Kb3 14.Qe2 Bxe1 15.Qxe1 Ne4 16.Bd2 Nxd2 17.Qxd2 a6 18. Ra3 checkmate.
Alternately, Black raced to destruction after 5.d3 in Wall,B - 3xp7s, Chess.com, 2010: 5...Ke8 6.dxe4 Bb4+ 7.c3 Ba5 8.Bg5 Black resigned.
There is more involved here than the future of Black's b-pawn. To that end, he needed to look at 23...Nc5, with the idea that 24.Rc7 could be met with 24...Nce6, so that Black can answer 25.Rxb7 with 25...h5!? and then 26...Kh7, if allowed. If White tries 26.g6!?, Black will have 26...Rh6 and eventually he will gather in the pawn.
That's a whole lot of thinking in a 3-minute game, so it is best not to be too judgmental about Black's play. 24.Ree7 Nh5 25.Nd6 Nc5 26.Rc7 Kf8 27.Rf7+ Kg8 28.Nf5 Ne6 29.Rce7 Nc5
He probably should have tried 29...Nxg5, with an even game.
41.Kd2
Instead 41.Rd8+ would finish up, but I am sure that time was short. 41...Ke8 42.Rb7 Rf8 43.Rxh7 Rf7 44.Rh8+ Rf8 45.Rh7 Rf7 46.Rh8+ Kd7 47.Ke3 Ke6 48.Kf4 Ne2+ 49.Kg4 Nd4
Reader quickturtle must have been browsing back posts on this blog recently (something that I highly recommend, by the way: there are almost 1,300 of them; you can use the "search this blog" Google gadget if you are looking for something special) as he posted a comment to "A Jerome Gambit 'Challenger' ", my tale of a Jerome Gambit-tinged battle against the venerable Chess Challenger 7 chess computer.
Because his comment hints at future adventures, I reprint it here:
Rick, this was a wonderful game and analysis. I still have to give the CC7 a lot of credit considering it's age and the limited amount of info those old machines had. I still have a Fidelity Designer 2100 and a Novag Super Expert and now I'm going to pull them out of the closet and give the Jerome a shot with them :)
Good luck against those silicon dinosaurs, quickturtle.
Be careful, too: remember those "Jurassic Park" movies!