Better isn't good enough

White starts out in the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) with what can objectively be called "a lost game."

Fortunately, most club level chess games hardly proceed along "objective" lines.

Still, my opponent's sudden resignation – when I figured that he had solved the opening and was looking forward to some decent counter-play – came as a bit of a mystery to me.

Perhaps Jerome Gambit Gemeinde member Pete Banks was playing the wise detective when he suggested that some defenders never quite get over the "shock and awe" of the Jerome Gambit!

perrypawnpusher - GabrielChime
blitz 12 0, FICS, 2009

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6

A good defense, one of a number of refutations to the Jerome Gambit.

7.Qd5+

The "nudge".

7...Ke8 8.Qxc5 d6 9.Qe3

So far we are moving along well-travelled lines – I have over 70 games with this position in my database, starting with Charlick - Mann, correspondence, 1881: 9...Nf6 10.d4 Qe7 11.0-0 Ng4 12.Qe2 Qh4 13.h3 Nf6 14.f4 Nh5 15.Qf2 Qxf2+ 16.Rxf2 Rf8 17.f5 Ne7 18.c4 c6 19.g4 Nf6 20.Nc3 d5 21.e5 Nd7 22.cxd5 Nxd5 23.Ne4 N7b6 24.b3 a5 25.e6 h6 26.Bb2 Ke7 27.Re1 Ra7 28.Nc5 Na8 29.Nd3 b5 30.Ne5 Kd6 31.Rc1 Ra6 32.Rc5 Bb7 33.Rfc2 Rc8 34.Bc1 a4 35.b4 a3 36.Bd2 Nab6 37.Be1 Na4 38.Bg3 Ke7 39.Nd7 Nxc5 40.dxc5 Rg8 41.Bd6+ Ke8 42.Rd2 Ra4 43.Rxd5 cxd5 44.f6 gxf6 45.Nxf6+ Kd8 46.e7+ Kc8 47.Nxg8 Bc6 48.Nf6 Rxb4 49.e8Q+ Bxe8 50.Nxe8 Rb1+ 51.Kf2 Rb2+ 52.Kf3 Rxa2 53.Nc7 b4 54.Nxd5 b3 55.c6 Rc2 56.Bxa3 Ra2 57.Bd6 Rc2 58.Be5 b2 59.Nb6+ Kd8 60.c7+ Rxc7 61.Bxb2 Rc5 62.Bd4 Rb5 63.Nc4 Ke7 64.h4 Ke6 65.Ke4 Rb1 66.Ne3 Kf7 67.h5 Kg8 68.Nf5 Kh7 69.Be3 Re1 70.Nxh6 Rxe3+ 71.Kxe3 Kxh6 72.Kf4 Black resigned

9...Ne5 

This is new to me. Maybe Black is trying to provoke my pawns?

10.f4

A little bit better might have been 10.d4.

10...Ng4 11.Qg3

I've had problems with "Wild Horses" a number of times in the past.

11...g6 12.d4

If those "Jerome pawns" look eggshell-brittle, I agree. The simple 12.0-0 was better.  

12...Qe7

Black begins to pressure the center, although 12...N8f6 might have been a better start. 

13.Nc3 Bd7 14.0-0 N4f6

I think that Black is holding his own (in part because he has not been developed enough to benefit from advancing his pawns), although after the game Rybka surprisingly suggested that Black should castle-by-hand on the Queenside: 14...Kd8 15.h3 N4f6 16.e5 Nh5 17.Qd3 Kc8 18.Bd2 Kb8 with a small edge to White.

15.e5 Nh5 16.Qf2

Better was16.Qf3. That "horse" was really throwing me. 

16...Bf5 17.exd6

This cannot be right: White throws away his large pawn center for a chance to make a check along the e-file. Rybka rates the resulting position as roughly even, but the "Jerome pawns" are much more effective as a unit, not split to make pawn majorities on each side.

17...Qxd6

18.Be3 Kd7 19.Rae1 Rd8 20.h3 Ngf6

Stronger was the move that Black probably originally intended, 20...Kc8.

21.g4 Black resigned

Yes, Black will have to return his extra piece, but in doing so he will probably receive open lines to attack White's King. At the end of the game, Black still has an edge, so my opponent's resignation surprised me.

Is this the new face of the Jerome Gambit??

Chuck Norris doesn't checkmate his opponent's King – one look, and the enemy monarch dives off of the board...

I don't know what it is, but lately I've played a number of short Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) and Jerome Gambit-ish games (see "Notes Longer Than the Game" and "A Game Shorter Than the Notes").

I don't think it's a case of my opponents runing from their keyboards shrieking "The horror! The horror!" Maybe the opening is just getting a little respect.

Now that would really be scary.

perrypawnpusher - ronnn
blitz 10 0, FICS, 2009

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ g6

It's always fun to stick a pawn in the face of an attacking piece.

7.Qxe5

Followed by "the pause."

Maybe my opponent overlooked the capture of the Knight. Maybe he wanted to give back a piece, but overlooked that now the Rook is en prise. Maybe he was trying to remember that old Blackburne game...

7...Bxf2+

For thoughts on this idea, both kind and not-so, see "Jerome Gambit Strikes in Denmark!"

8.Kxf2 Qf6+

Black forces the Queens off of the board.

9.Qxf6+ Kxf6

Black resigned

Black is a pawn down in a Queenless middle game (or endgame), certainly a playable situation at the club level, especially in blitz. Apparently he had had enough for one game.

The Worst Chess Opening Ever

I just submitted an article on the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) titled "The Worst Chess Opening Ever" to Chess Life for Kids, which runs my regular "Arabian Knights" stories.

If the editor doesn't die laughing, I'll let you know if he accepts it for publication.

graphic by Jeff Bucchino, the Wizard of Draws

Always Learning

I find that when I play the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+), there is always something to learn. Some of the lessons are about the opening and some of them are about chess, itself. 

perrypawnpusher - Feestt
blitz, FICS, 2009

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+

I'm still not yet comfortable with the "modern" Jerome Gambit, with its alternatives to 5.Nxe5.

6...Ng6 7.Qd5+ Ke8 8.Qxc5 d6

Also playable was the sensible 8...Qe7.

9.Qe3 Nf6 10.0-0 Kf7

Black prepares to swing his Rook into action. I figured that I needed to get my "Jerome pawns" moving as quickly as possible.

11.f4 Ng4

Black acts to take advantage of the "misplaced" Queen who has made over 1/3 of White's moves, but this notion is faulty. He would have done better to stay the course with 11...Re8 with advantage. 

12.Qg3

This is such a natural place for the Queen in this variation that I didn't examine the position deeply. After the game, Rybka suggested 12.Qb3+, with the idea that after 12...Ke8 White can annoy the Knights with 13.h3 Nf6 14.f5 Ne5 15.d4 Nc6 16.Be3 b6 – the point being that 16...Nxe4 could be met by 17.d5 Ng3 18.dxc6 Nxf1 19.Bd4 bxc6 20.Bxg7 and an even game.  

I had dismissed 12.Qb3+ too early, expecting that it would be well-met by 12...Be6, but Rybka showed that this was a shallow fear: White then has the return 13.Qg3, threatening the fork at f5, and after 13...Qh4 14.Qxh4 Nxh4 White has an even game after 15.f5 Bd7 16.Rf4 Nxf5 17.h3 Nf6 18.exf5.

Lesson: It's not good enough to play a bad opening, you have to play a bad opening well.

12...Re8

Back to "business as usual", although here Rybka prefers 12...c5 as a preventative move against a future d2-d4 attack on a Knight at e5. Deep thinking.

13.f5 N6e5 14.d4 Nc6

Giving back a piece, with plans to blow up White's center. Black's King can slip back to g8, castling-by-hand, if things get too hot.

The "know-it-all" Rybka suggests that this is better accomplished by 14...Nf6 15.dxe5 dxe5.

White now has the advantage.

15.Qxg4 Nxd4 16.Na3

Protecting the c-pawn. Good for you if you realized that the move was not necessary: with 16.Bg5 Qd7 17.Nc3  White builds his attack, as the pawn means little (if 17...Nxc2, then 18.Rad1).

If Black does not capture the c-pawn, but tucks his King in with 17...Kg8, then White can return his Queen with 18.Qd1 and still have an advantage, as f5-f6 is a move that is coming.

16...d5

The King needed to duck back to g8, instead.

17.Qh5+ Kg8

 Here I looked at 18.Bg5 Qd7 19.f6, but abandoned it because of the reply 19...g6. Too bad! If I had looked one move further – Where can the Queen go? –  I would have seen that 20.Qd1 threatens both the Black Knight at d4 and the move f6-f7+, forking the King and Rook.  

My response actually gives my opponent the advantage again.

18.exd5 Qxd5

Feestt falls for the one trick in the position. Perhaps he was pleased to finish off my center and figured that he could work out the pawn-down situation later, perhaps in a Bishops-of-opposite-colors endgame. 

However, if he had played 18...Bxf5, instead of the capture at d5, he would have been able to take advantage of the looseness in White's position with something like: 19.c4 c6 20.Bg5 Qb6 and Black is even, or maybe even a bit better.

19.Qxe8 checkmate

A Discouraging Word

Oh, give me a home

Where the buffalo roam

Where the deer and the antelope play'

Where seldom is heard

A discouraging word,

And the sky is not cloudy all day.

     – from the poem "Oh give me a Home" by Dr. Brewster M. Higley; later set to music as "The Western Home" by Clarence and Eugene Harlan, and Dan Kelley; known better today as the song "Home on the Range"

From Secrets of Practical Chess, by Grandmaster John Nunn:

When looking through "dubious opening" analysis, look out for the following:

1) "nothing moves" by the opponent (i.e. the one facing the dubious opening), which only waste time

2) Lines in which the opponent pretends he is in the nineteenth century, co-operatively brabs all the material on offer, and allows a brilliant finish

3) Lines which are given without any assessment

4) Secret code words

5) "Winning With" authors display great ingenuity in finding resources for "their" side, but often overlook even quite simple tactical defenses for the "other" side.

6) Do not trust lines that are not based on practical examples. The more examples there are, and the higher the standard of the players, the more trust you can place in the line.

I feel comfortable with Dr. Nunn's wisdom, as from the earliest days of this blog I have been straight-forward – on a good day the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) aspires to be known as a "junk opening," but likely still over-reaches!

"But – Is this stuff playable??" is a question that has been addressed a number of times. I have tried to be fair in my analysis of chances for both sides.

Still, I like the opening, it's fun to play in fun games, and it is an enjoyable way to give "odds".

If I ever face Grandmaster Magnus Carlsen in a simultaneous exhibition, I'll surely use a more appropriate opening.

Hah! Who am I kidding?? I'd never pass up the chance to see what the number one rated chessplayer in the world would play against the Jerome!

Jerome Gambit Odds

I've mentioned a number of times how the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) can be played as a way of giving odds to a weaker player.

White's plan should be to strike quickly, before his opponent gets his bearings.

perrypawnpusher  - Dogyou
blitz 10 0, FICS, 2009

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ke6

7.Qf5+ Kd6 8.f4 Qe8

This move was new to me. It has some of the characteristics of the more usual 8...Qf6, although it doesn't immediately threaten the exchange of Queens.

Sharpest was 8...Qh4+, entering the malestrom of the Nibs Defense. 

9.fxe5+

More precise might be 9.d3, as Rybka suggests that the top two responses are 9...Kc6 and 9...Nxd3, not necessarily a club player's choices. (Rybka's third choice is 9...Nh6, which is what I would go with.)

9...Qxe5 10.Qf3 Nf6

I've had this position six times before (6-0) and played 11.d3 each time. For some reason, in this game I varied here.

11.Nc3 a6

Again, one of the interesting (and advantageous) things about the Jerome Gambit is how often a defensive move by the Black King is the best choice, despite the adage about not moving a piece too many times.

Here, Dogyou prevents Nc3-b5+, but three of the top four moves that Rybka likes are King moves, the best being 11...Kc6, maintaining a clear advantage for Black.

12.d3

Better here was 12.d4, throwing White's pieces against the enemy Queen and King, e.g. 12...Qxd4 13.Bf4+ Kc6 14.Rd1 Qc4 15.e5+, and Black has only a small advantage. 

There is something about this kind of set-up that makes my opponents prone to an optical illusion. I don't understand it and i can't explain it. There is a blatant threat – is it that hard to see?

12...c6 13.Bf4

This is the sixth time I've gotten away with this, but the trick is as old as Vazquez - Giraudy, Mexico, 1876 (remove White's Queen Rook) 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ke6 7.Qf5+ Kd6 8.d4 Bxd4 9.c3 Bb6 10.f4 Qf6 11.fxe5+ Qxe5 12.Bf4 Qxf4 13.Qxf4+ Ke7 14.Rf1 Nh6 15.Qe5+ Kd8 16.Qxg7 Re8 17.Qg5+ Re7 18.Rf8 checkmate

13...Bd4 14.0-0-0

Not bad, but the simple 14.Bxe5+ followed by 15.d4 was stronger.

14...Bxc3

Black's game goes to pieces.

15.bxc3 g5 16.Bxe5+ Kxe5

17.Qf5+ Kd6 18.Qxf6+ Kc7 19.Qxh8 b5 20.Qe5+ Kb6 21.Qd6 Black resigned

Notes Longer than the Game

Here's another game, a Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+), that was over before it was actually over. Maybe my opponent had heard scary things about the opening. Maybe he just thought he could do better with the White pieces. (He could: he beat me the next game.)

perrypawnpusher  - Langan
blitz 8 0, FICS, 2009

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+

6...Ke6

A strong move. Perhaps Langan is familiar with the Jerome?

7.Qf5+ Kd6 8.f4 Qh4+

The best move at this point, although 8...Qf6 is also fine.

9.g3 Qf6

For the suprising and suprisingly good 9...Nf3+, see "Tied Up, or How Much is A Queen Worth?" and "Jerome Gambit Tournament: Chapter II".

10.fxe5+ Qxe5 Black resigns

A bit of a surprise, as Black has the significant advantage of a piece for a pawn. Unlike yesterday's game, time was not an issue. No word from my opponent, just a challenge for another game.

I've reached this position before, and the game went: 11.Qxe5+ Kxe5 12.b4 Bf8 13.0-0 Nf6 14.Bb2+ Ke6 15.b5 a6 16.a4 axb5 17.axb5 Rxa1 18.Bxa1 b6 19.e5 Nd5 20.c4 Nb4 21.d4 c6 22.Bc3 g5 23.Rf6+ Ke7 24.Bxb4+ Ke8 25.Rxf8+ Rxf8 26.Bxf8 Kxf8 27.Nc3 Kf7 28.Kf2 Ke6 29.Ke3 Kf5 30.Ne4 d5 31.exd6 Bd7 32.bxc6 Bxc6 33.d5 Bd7 34.g4+ Kg6 35.h3 h6 36.c5 bxc5 37.Nxc5 Bb5 38.d7 Bxd7 Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - Kevin the fruitbat, JG3 thematic, Chessworld, 2008