I was playing an interesting Semi-Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit (where it looked like I had just taken the advantage) on FICS when my opponent disconnected. I sent him a message that I hoped we could continue the game.
My opponent signed back on, I offered a resumption of the game, but, he started one with another player.
When that game ended, I again offered a resumption. Instead of accepting, my opponent disconnected. I never got a response to my message.
Although I have been through disconnection hassles on FICS before (see "A Sneaky Way to Defeat the Jerome Gambit") I forgot that none of the above was relevant when it came to the adjudication of a game. The rules state
The outcome of an adjudication is primarily based on position and clocks. Who disconnected is rarely a decisive factor.
I was confident in my position, so I requested an ajudication.
My mistake.
It turns out that out of 35 possible moves that my opponent could make, 33 left me with a winning advantage, and one led to a drawn game. One move, however – one that I had not seen – led to a winning game for Black.
So the game was adjudicated a win for Black.
Which leads me to wonder, would my opponent ever have agreed to resume our game? If so, would he have found the one winning move? If not, did my own request for adjudication turn a game in which I still had practical chances into one in which I was dead lost?
Something to think about...
A while back (see "Ed Yetman's Gambit Challenge Quads") I wrote about an adventurous chess player in Tuscon, Arizona, USA, who had offered to play the White side of the Smith-Morra Gambit (1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3), the Paris Gambit (1.Nh3 d5 2.g3 e5 3.f4 Bxh3 4.Bxh3 exf4 5.0-0 fxg3 6.hxg3) or the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) in his games in a quad.
He even published a link to an early analysis of the Jerome Gambit to give potential opponents an opportunity to study beforehand. (From the analysis: "[W]e give the Jerome Gambit as a representative form of this kind of attack on its merits, showing its strength and weakness apart from accidental circumstances, which in actual play may materially affect the result.")
I recently checked with Ed Yetman and he reported, surprisingly, that not a single player was brave enough to take up his challenge!
I can understand someone not wanting to face the Smith-Morra Gambit: many who play it are booked to the eyeballs and dangerous as a rattlesnake.
Maybe the Paris Gambit was a bit to odd or foreign for people's tastes.
But, the Jerome Gambit ??
In a variation that has seen quick resignations, my opponent takes the game a bit further on down the road. No matter, his stopping point is the same.
perrypawnpusher - Gibarian
blitz, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nc3 Nc6 4.Bc4 Bc5
The Italian Four Knights game.
5.Bxf7+
The Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit.
5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.d4
7...Bb4
This has given Black trouble before although the defense surely is playable. Best was 7...Bd6 8.dxe5 Bxe5 and the second player is better.
8.dxe5 Nxe4
Or 8...Bxc3+ 9.bxc3 Nxe4 10.Qd5+ Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - ohforgetit, blitz, FICS, 2010
Black stayed around longer in perrypawnpusher - obmanovichhh, FICS, 2010: 8...Bxc3+ 9.bxc3 Nxe4 10.Qd5+ Kf8 11.Qxe4 d6 12.0-0 dxe5 13.Qxe5 Qe7 14.Bf4 Qxe5 15.Bxe5 c6 16.Rad1 Bf5 17.Rd2 Kf7 18.Rfd1 Rhe8 19.f4 Re6 20.Rd8 Rxd8 21.Rxd8 Re7 22.Rd2 g5 23.g3 gxf4 24.gxf4 Be6 25.a3 Bc4 26.Kf2 b5 27.Ke3 a5 28.Rd6 Bd5 29.Rh6 Kg8 30.Kd4 a4 31.Kc5 Be4 32.Rxc6 Bxc6 33.Kxc6 Re6+ 34.Kxb5 Rh6 35.c4 Kf7 36.c5 Ke6 37.c6 Ke7 38.Kb6 Kd8 39.Kb7 Black resigned,
9.Qd5+
At this point Black resigned in perrypawnpusher - kezientz, FICS 2010
9...Ke8 10.Qxe4 Rf8
An oversight, but Black plays on.
11.Qxb4 b6 12.Qe4 Rb8 13.Qxh7 Qe7 14.Qh5+ Kd8
15.Bg5 Rf6 16.Bxf6 gxf6 17.Qh8+ Qe8 18.Qxf6+ Qe7 19.0-0 Bb7
20.Qh8+ Qe8 21.Qxe8+ Kxe8 22.f4 Ke7 23.f5 Rg8
24.g3 a5 25.Rad1 c5 26.Nd5+ Kf7 27.Nxb6 Ke8 28.Nxd7 Kf7 29.Nxc5 Bc6 30.e6+ Ke7 31.f6+ Kf8 32.Rd8+ Be8 33.Nd7 checkmate
Much of this game revolves around the struggle of a "Jerome pawn" to fulfill its destiny and advance to the 8th rank for promotion.
Congratulations, persistent pawn!
perrypawnpusher - jaymen
blitz, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nc3 Nc6 4.Bc4 h6 5.0-0 Bc5
Transposing into the Semi-Italian Four Knights Game.
6.Bxf7+
The Semi-Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit. (This game helped drag my score in this line up to 63%.)
6...Kxf7 7.Nxe5+ Nxe5 8.d4
8...Bxd4 9.Qxd4 Qe7 10.f4
Or 10.Bf4 c5 11.Qxe5 Qxe5 12.Bxe5 Ng4 13.Bg3 d6 14.Rad1 Rd8 15.h3 Nf6 16.Bxd6 Be6 17.Bxc5 Rac8 18.Rxd8 Rxd8 19.Bxa7 Bc4 20.Re1 Ra8 21.Bd4 Bxa2 22.Nxa2 Rxa2 23.Bxf6 Kxf6 24.Rb1 b5 25.f3 Kg5 26.Kf2 Kf4 27.g3+ Kg5 28.f4+ Black disconnected and forfeited, perrypawnpusher - philippemuurmans, blitz, FICS, 2010.
10...c5
Illustrating the principle: when your piece is attacked, don't immediately withdraw it, look for a greater threat against your opponent.
Unfortunately, that doesn't hold in this case, and 10...Nc6 was necessary to preserve Black's advantage.
11.Qxe5 Re8
One benefit to White of playing 10.f4 instead of 10.Bf4 is that if Black had exchanged Queens here, White would have a pawn on e5 attacking Black's pinned Knight on f6. Therefore Black acquiesces to losing a piece.
12.Qxe7+ Rxe7 13.e5 Ne8 14.Bd2
On this and the next move for White, Rybka prefers Nd5.
14...b6 15.Rae1 Kg8
Black has castled-by-hand, but is down a pawn and, more importantly, remains cramped and behind in development
16.f5 Ba6 17.Rf2 Rd8
18.f6
After the game Rybka suggested a more positional approach: 18.Nd5 Rf7 19.g4 Bb7 20.Nf4 Nc7 21.c4 Rc8 22.Ng6 Re8 23.h3 Ba6 24.b3 Bb7
analysis diagram
18...Rf7 19.Ne4 d5
Black lashes out, and gets a defensible game if White captures the d-pawn en passant, but probably better was to exchange pawns on f6.
20.e6 Rxf6 21.Nxf6+ Nxf6 22.e7 Re8
23.Bxh6 gxh6
Too cooperative. Instead 23...Ne4 24.Rf8+ Rxf8 25.exf8Q+ Kxf8 26.Bf4 eliminates White's passer in what amounts to an exchange of pawns.
24.Rxf6 Bc8
25.Rxh6
Next time I'll see 25.Rf8+ Rxf8 26.e8Q.
25...Kf7 26.Rh7+ Kf6 27.Rh6+ Kg7 28.Rh4 d4
The pawn at e7 has survived so far, but it will need help to promote.
29.Rf4 a6 30.h4 Kg6 31.Rf8 Bd7 32.Rxe8 Bxe8
33.Rf1 Bf7 34.g4
Here come the distractions.
34...c4 35.h5+ Kg7 36.h6+ Kxh6 37.Rxf7 Kg6 38.e8Q
38...d3 39.Qg8+ Kh6 40.Rh7 checkmate
The Jerome Gambit Thematic Tournament taking place at Chess.com looks like it is close to crowning its winner.
Daves111 leads with 21 points, having finished all 24 of his games.
If TWODOGS, at 8 points from 11 games, wins all of his remaining games (13) he could catch Daves111 and tie for first.
Of course, if dark horse CheckmateKingTwo, at 2 points from 4 games, wins his final 20 games, he could leapfrog over both Daves111 and TWODOGs...
Not in the battle for top honors, but fighting for second place, are DREWBEAR (17 points out of 21 games) and stampyshortlegs (9 points out of 16 games).
Blackburne (12 points out of 21 games) and Crusader Rabbit (10 points out of 18 games) are on their heels.
I have always rolled on the floor laughing when I hear Jonathan Coulton's goofball song "Re: Your Brains".
Corporate zombies, anyone?
What could be better?
How about a video with CaptainValor signing the song in American Sign Language (ASL)?
What a scream!
This is for all of my friends in the United States Chess Association of the Deaf, as well as the good people under the auspices of the International Committe of Silent Chess.
We'll be back to the Jerome Gambit tomorrow – scary enough for you?
My first game against Abatwa (see"Pulled Up Short") was short. I challenged him again days later: would anything be different?
perrypawnpusher - Abatwa
blitz, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6
Black decided, after some thought, not to play the Blackburne Shilling Gambit, as in our first game, perrypawnpusher - Abatwa, blitz, FICS, 2010 (1-0, 8).
Good choice, but he was not out of the woods yet.
4.Nc3 Bc5 5.Bxf7+
The Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit.
5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.d4
7...Rf8
Figuring, I guess, that since he is going to lose a piece no matter which one he moves, he might as well prepare to safegard his King by castling-by-hand. Under other circumstances this would be a fine idea, but his best move here was 7...Bd6.
8.dxe5 Ne8
Understandably wanting to stay a piece ahead, but it was necessary to surrender one with 8...d6 9.exf6 Qxf6 10.0-0 Qe5 when White will have an edge.
9.Qd5+ Ke7
After the game Rybka showed that Black's King could reach safety in a round-about way: 9...Kg6 10.Qxc5 d6 11.Qd4 Kf7 12.Be3 Kg8. However, after 13.0-0-0 White is clearly better.
10.Bg5+ Black resigned
What an uncomfortable position!
After 10...Nf6 11.exf6+ gxf6 12.Qxc5+ d6 it looks like White has won two pieces, only to have left two en prise himself, but with 13.Nd5+! he can give the Bishop back and maintain the attack, e.g. 13...Kd7 14.Qd4 fxg5 15.Qg7+ (or 15.0-0-0).
