1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ ...and related lines
(risky/nonrisky lines, tactics & psychology for fast, exciting play)
Wednesday, January 7, 2026
Jerome Gambit: If I Only Had...
Tuesday, January 6, 2026
Jerome Gambit: Avoid the Quicksand
Black's offer of a Rook in Whistler's defense to the Jerome Gambit is like an offer to step into quicksand - things might not turn out well for White.
I have tried to be clear about this, as in "Jerome Gambit: Taking the Rook Now is Fatal" - and in the following game.
Games played at bullet speed, 1 minute, no increment, though, make the outcome difficult to predict. Courting danger is ultra risky.
It is only fair to point out that, even so, the first player had a chance to escape his dilemma - which he discovered a bit too late.
Arman-Avdalyan - Nguoihatrong
1 0 bullet, lichess.org, 2025
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+
4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ g6 7.Qxe5 Qe7
Whistler's defense, possibly Black's strongest choice, from a computer's perspective.
The Database, however, illustrates the complications of the position: there are 687 games with 7...Qe7, with White scoring 50%. Now, 8.Qxh8 has been played in 492 games, with White scoring 51%. Stockfish 16.1 scoffs.
Recommended, instead, is to leave the Rook alone and play 8.Qh4+, which appears in 73 games in The Database, with White scoring 57%.
8.Qxh8
What follows is difficult to watch. White voluntarily walks into the quicksand.
8...Qxe4+ 9.Kd1 Qg4+ 10.f3 Qxg2 11.Qxh7+
White strikes back, but his King still remains in mortal danger.
11...Kf8 12.Re1 Qxf3+ 13.Re2 Qf1+ 14.Re1 Qf3+ 15.Re2 d6
Preparing to add one more piece to the attack.
16.d4
White could use more development, himself.
16...Bg4
I am impressed at Black's defense, especially in a game with limited thinking time. He seems to be familiar with the Jerome Gambit, although I can find only one other game of his in The Database.
That said, with this move he gets ahead of himself. The line suggested by Stockfish 16.1 treats White's King cruelly, and leads to great advantage: 16...Qf1+ 17.Kd2 Bg4 18.Nc3 Bb4 19.Re1 Qf2+ 20.Kd3 Bf5+ 21.Kc4 Bxc3 22.bxc3 Qxc2 23.Qxc7 Qa4+ 24.Kd5 Nf6+ 25.Kxd6 Qa6+ 26.Kc5 Rc8 when the first player's material deficit is apparent, and the danger to his King, unabated.
17.Nc3
Protecting the Rook and coming to the aid of the King.
Alas, continuing the counter-attack (counter-counter-attack?) was necessary, instead, i.e. 17.Bh6+ Nxh6 18.Qxh6+ Kf7 (or 18...Kg8 19.Qxg6+, etc.) 19.Qh7+ Kf8 20.Qe7+ and White will check his way to a draw by repetition. Whew!
17...Bxd4 18.Bh6+
19...Nxh6 19.Qxh6+ Bg7
The Bishop falls back on defense.
20.Qe3
A slip, but nothing helps.
20...Qxe3 White resigned
Monday, January 5, 2026
Jerome Gambit: Fun
Sunday, January 4, 2026
Jerome Gambit: Danger
I am re-reading Amatzia Avni's classic, Danger in Chess, How to Avoid Making Blunders (Dover, 2003; Cadogan Books 1994).
Just, because.
Avni starts the chapter "Common Failures in the Sensing of Danger: Opponent-Related Factors", under the subtitle "When the opponent plays badly in the opening"
Suppose you play against someone who makes some silly moves, right from the start. He sheds material, or plays not in accordance with development rules, or he makes apparently self-destructive moves... Most chess players, when faced with such an enemy, tend to relax and expect an early success. It is a human trait to count on consistency in behaviour; if our adversary played weakly until now, so we reason, he is likely to demonstrate the same low quality in the following phses of the game as well.
This line of thought is devoid of empirical justification. our opponent may posess poor openings knowledge, but still be a strong middlegame player. Or he may have deliberately made early provoations to lead us to think that our victory is assured.
Whatever our impression about our rivaal's level of play, we must stay on guard!
The Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) comes to mind, doesn't it?
Checking with The Database, I have played 786 games with the Jerome Gambit, scoring 82%.
This is dwarfed by Bill Wall's 1,352 games, scoring 94%.
The moral is clear, our opponents must stay on guard: after all, Stockfish 16.1 evaluates the Jerome Gambit (35 ply) as being about 2 2/3 pawns better, for Black.
Saturday, January 3, 2026
Tournaments Update
My hope is to play a number of Abrahams Jerome Gambits, 1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Bc5 3.Bxf7+, a line that I have not tried before, but is worth exploring.
Friday, January 2, 2026
Blackburne Shilling Jerome Gambit: Open Lines
In the following game, White opens lines against the enemy King and Queen, and then attacks along those lines. Black's King's mis-steps increased his danger.
PedrosF1 - reykarl
10 0 rapid, lichess.org, 2025
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4
Blackburne Shilling Gambit
4.Bxf7+
Blackburne Shilling Jerome Gambit
4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Kf6
Hoping to evict the enemy Knight.
6.Nf3 Nxf3+ 7.Qxf3+ Ke7
Black has a piece for two pawns, but his King is poorly placed.
It is interesting that Stockfish 16.1 has White meeting 7...Ke6 with 8.Qf5+ Ke7 9.Qg5+ Ke8 10.Qh5+ Ke7 11.Qg5+ with a draw in the offing.
8.O-O Ke8
Instead of this retreat, 8...Qe8 9.d4 Qf7 is equal.
9.d4 d6
10.c4 Be7 11.Nc3 Nf6 12.Bg5 h6 13.Bxf6 Bxf6 14.e5

























