Good Luck Is Better...

The old saying goes "Good luck is better than a license to steal."

As much as I would like to think that my success in this game was due to "superior skill", I have to attribute most of it to Dame Fortune.
perrypawnpusher - deceptionmaster
blitz, FICS, 2013

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6 

The Semi-Italian Opening.

4.0-0 Bc5 5.Bxf7+ 

The Semi-Italian Jerome Gambit.

5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.d4 Ne7 

A reasonable decision by Black: since he is going to lose a piece anyhow, he simply develops another. I was surprised to see only one example in The Database, Jabbaman - HrDoctor, PlayChess.com, 2003, (1-0, 16)

8.dxc5

Also possible was 8.Qh5+ N5g6 9.Qxc5, but I was planning to use my pawns for a central clamp.

8...Rf8 9.f4 N5c6 10.Nc3 Kg8 11.e5 

After the game Rybka 3 recommended, instead, advancing the f-pawn, i.e., 11.f5 b6 12.f6 Ng6 13.fxg7 Rxf1+ 14.Qxf1 Kxg7 with the idea of exposing Black's King, leaving the defender only slightly better.

I still prefer my move.

11...b6 12.Be3 bxc5 13.Bxc5 Ba6 14.Rf2 Rf5 

Black has been developing well, but I thought that this move was a bit provocative. Set to "blunder check" at 5 minutes a move after the game, Rybka 3 had nothing to say, however.

15.g4 Rf7 16.Qe1 

Probably better was 16.Qd2.

16...Nc8 17.f5 Nb6 18.Qe4 Bb7 

19.Rd1

I was almost beginning to like my position. The problem is that my planned e5-e6 is not going to amount to much.

19...Qe8 20.e6 dxe6 21.fxe6 Rxf2 22.Kxf2 Rd8 

White's e-pawn is a weakie (as 22...Nd8 would have shown), but I still had a few ideas about how I could use it - if my opponent let me.

23.Rf1 Rd2+

I had expected this aggressive move, and appreciated the tempo it forced upon me.

24.Kg1

This works, but technically 24.Ke1 was better.

24...Qd8 

I am not sure what - or how much - my opponent overlooked here, but this is an unfortunate blitz error. Perhaps he was returning some material - a Queen for a Rook and a Bishop - and figured the remaining imbalance of 2 Knights, Bishop and Rook would outplay my Queen and Knight; but there is an oversight in that evaluation.

25.Rf8+ Qxf8 26.Bxf8 Kxf8 27.Qf4+ 

Black's Rook is hanging. Now all I had to do was avoid blundering and avoid running out of time.

27...Ke7 28.Qxd2

After the game Rybka 3 harped that I should have played 28.Qf7+ Kd6 29.Ne4+ Ke5 30.Nxd2. Whatever. 

28...Ne5 29.Qe3 Nf3+ 30.Kf2 Nxh2 31.Qc5+ Kxe6 32.Qxc7 Nxg4+ 33.Kg3 Bc8 34.Kxg4 Black resigned

A Game for the Skeptics

Another game from the "Netherlands collection" shows White facing a "theoretical novelty" (there are so many ways to face and defeat the Jerome Gambit!) with some creativity of his own – leading to a miniature that probably pleased the first player (and anyone else looking on).

Jabbaman - HrDoctor
HCL-B1994 www.playch (6), 2003

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6

The Semi-Italian Opening.

4.0-0 Bc5 5.Bxf7+

The Semi-Italian Jerome Gambit.

5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.d4 Ne7

TN. Developing another piece, giving a piece back. No other examples in The Database.

8.Qh5+ N5g6

With all those pieces available, it still is probably best to react to White's Queen check with 8...g6.

9.Qxc5 Re8 10.f4 Kg8

Black has castled-by-hand, and White has mobilized his "Jerome pawns". The position is close to even.

11.f5 Nf8 12.f6

Wasting no time breaking into the King's position.

12...gxf6 13.Qh5

This is the kind of position that produces Jerome Gambit skeptics: White has been giving away pieces, and playing with his pawns and his Queen; while Black has gotten his King to safety and developed three pieces...

Only, the game is even, or White might be a bit better; as he has (or will have) enough pawns to compensate for his sacrificed piece, and his developing pieces will pose more threats to Black's King than Black's already-developed pieces will pose to White's King.

13...Nc6 14.Bxh6 Rxe4 15.Bxf8 d5 16.Qg6+ Black resigned

After 16...Kxf8 White will win Black's Queen with 17.Rxf6+.