The Jerome Gambit: jayshanker

Showing posts with label jayshanker. Show all posts

Saturday, June 13, 2009

If not a Jerome Gambit...

Sometimes, when I cannot achieve a Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) in the opening, I am happy to move on into a Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit, and I am usually able to find a Jerome-ish theme or two there, as well...

perrypawnpusher - TheMagicTorch
blitz FICS, 2009
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6

4.0-0 Nxe4 5.Nc3 f5

An unusual and risky continuation, as in my game vs jayshanker. The regular B-K continues after 5...Nxc3 6.dxc3

6.Re1

The suggested move in "Boden-Kieseritzky-Jerome Gambit?"

6...Bc5

More prudent seems to be 6...d6.

7.Nxe4

I was having Jerome dreams dancing in my head, but, really, 7.d4 was better, as with 7...d5 8.Bxd5 Nxc3 9.Bxc6+ bxc6 10.Rxe5+ Be7 11.bxc3 0-0 and White has the advantage.

7...fxe4 8.Nxe5 Nxe5

Black would have had less of a problem if he had thought Jerome-ish-ly, too: 8...Bxf2+ 9.Kxf2 Qh4+ 10.Kg1 Nxe5 11.g3 Qf6 12.Rxe4 Kd8 when White's advantage is small.

9.Qh5+ g6 10.Qxe5+ Qe7

11.Qxh8+ Qf8 12.Rxe4+ Be7

13.Qxh7

A Rook ahead, I let my brain relax. Readers who enjoy tactics propably are asking themselves, "What about trying 13.Rxe7+ instead?" and they are right: 13...Kxe7 14.Qe5+ Kd8 15.d4 d6 16.Bg5+ Kd7 17.Be6+ Ke8 ( 17...Kc6 18.Qd5+ Kb6 19.Qb3+ Ka5 20.Bd2+ Ka6 21.Bc4+ b5 22.Qxb5#) 18.Qe2 Qg7 19.Re1 Bd7 20.Bxd7+ Kf8 21.Be6 Qf6 22.Bxf6 Re8 23.Qf3 Rxe6 24.Rxe6 Kg8 25.Bh8 h6 26.Re8+ Kh7 27.Qf7 checkmate. Good work!

13...c6 14.Qxg6+ Kd8

Timid Brain said: Watch out for that coming fork at d5!

Courageous Brain says: Bring it! Try: 15.d4 d5 16.Rxe7 Kxe7 17.Bg5+ Kd7 18.Qh7+ Kd6 19.Bh4 dxc4 20.Re1 Bf5 21.Bg3+ Kd5 22.Re5+ Kd6 23.Rxf5+ Ke6 24.Re5+ Kd6 25.Re7+ Qf4 26.Bxf4+ Kd5 27.Qe4 checkmate.

15.Re1 d5 16.Bb3 Bd7 17.d4

Now Black makes a slip, and his game folds up like an accordion.

17...Bh4 18.Bg5+ Kc7 19.Bxh4 Rc8 20.Bg3+ Kd8 21.Qg5+ Qe7 22.Qxe7 checkmate

Friday, February 20, 2009

Boden-Kieseritzky-Jerome Gambit??

My fascination with the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) sometimes gets me into adventures that I really shouldn't be able to get out of...

perrypawnpusher - jayshanker
blitz game 12 0, FICS 2009

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6

Not everybody wants to play the Giuoco Piano with 3...Bc5. Lately I've been answering 2...Nf3 (the Petroff Defense) with 3.Bc4 and if 3...Nxe4 then 4.Nc3, the Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit (4...Nxc3 5.dxc3). So I figured in this game to transpose from the Two Knights Defense into the B-KG as well.

4.0-0 Nxe4 5.Nc3 f5

So far, so good, although Black's last move is quite unusual. Since a main defence against the Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit involves ...f6, protecting the black e5 pawn, White should be able to count on decent play after the text with 6.Re1.

Of course, that was not what I was thinking, as I had a case of Jerome-Gambit-on-the-brain...

6.Nxe4 fxe4 7.Nxe5 Nxe5 8.Qh5+

Not precisely Jerome-ish, as White retains his King Bishop, but the thematic foolish sacrifice of material for a dubious attack is recognizable.

8...g6

Tic tac toe! Once again, the "shock and awe" of responding to the sacrifice makes up for much of its theoretical un-soundness.

There should be more to a gambit idea than just crossing my fingers and hoping, as the following defense should have resolved the game quickly in my opponent's favor: 8...Ng6 9.Re1 Qh4! (I don't think I'll test my luck twice with this line.)

9.Qxe5+ Be7