1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ ...and related lines
(risky/nonrisky lines, tactics & psychology for fast, exciting play)
Showing posts with label pascalwilliams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pascalwilliams. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Trust Me - I Know What I'm Doing...
The following game is a Jerome Gambit. It was played at blitz speed. My opponent appeared to be a bit unfamiliar with the line - giving me credit for some "sacrifices" that probably were "blunders".
perrypawnpusher - oopsaqueen
blitz, FICS, 2013
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6
The Semi-Italian Opening.
4.0-0 Bc5 5.Bxf7+
The Semi-Italian Jerome Gambit.
5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.Qh5+ Ng6
My opponent, oopsaqueen, has a pleasant 5-1 record on FICS defending an "accelerated Jerome Gambit" against the Semi-Italian Opening - 4.Bxf7+, etc.
However, he does not appear (according to The Database) to have faced the "normal" Semi-Italian Jerome Gambit, and in this game chooses a move (still okay for Black) that is weaker than 7...Ke6, 7...Ke8 or 7...g6.
8.Qd5+ Kf8 9.Qxc5+ d6 10.Qe3 Nf6
Black chose the alternative, 10...N8e7, in perrypawnpusher - pascalwilliams, blitz 3 0, FICS, 2007 (½-½, 32).
11.f4
The more sedate 11.f3 was seen in Wall,B - LC, Chess.com, 2010 (1-0, 20).
11...Kg8 12.f5 Ne5 13.d4 Nf7 14.e5
Thematic, but premature in this situation. White would have done better to complete his development with 14.Nc3 Qe7 15.Bd2 Bd7 16.Rae1 Re8.
14...dxe5 15.dxe5 Nd5
Here 15...Ng4 16.Qe4 Ngxe5 would have punished my rashness.
16.Qb3
Simply dropping a pawn, instead of the necessary 16.Qe2.
16...c6 17.Nc3
Here 17.e6 would have saved the e-pawn. Luckily for me, my opponent figured that I knew what I was doing.
17...Kh7 18.Nxd5 Qxd5 19.Qxd5 cxd5 20.e6 Ne5
By dint of good fortune, I have just about evened the game.
21.Bf4 Nc6 22.Rad1 Re8 23.Rxd5 Bxe6 24.fxe6 Rxe6
In another example of "Scientific Progress Goes Boink" (see "After the Refutation: Play On!"), my opponent has returned his extra piece for a couple of pawns, leaving him with a much freer game, but a pawn down.
25.c3 Rae8 26.Rfd1 a6 27.Rd7 Re1+ 28.Rxe1 Rxe1+ 29.Kf2 Ra1
30.Rxb7 Rxa2 31.Rb6 Ne7 32.c4 a5 33.Bd2 a4 34.Bc3 a3
35.Kf3 axb2 36.Bxb2 Nf5 37.Rb7 Ra5
Stopping the advance of White's c-pawn, but missing the threat.
38.g4 Nd6 39.Rxg7+ Kh8 Black resigned
White will win a Rook with 40.Ra7+.
Friday, May 7, 2010
The Killing Blow (Part I)
It is annoying to play a familiar opening line – only to slip and end up in grave danger. There is little margin for error in any variation of the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+).
While I awaited the killing blow, I consoled myself with something IM Gary Lane wrote in one of his "Opening Lanes" columns at ChessCafe:
perrypawnpusher - KenWhitaker
blitz 6 12, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6
The Semi-Italian Opening.
4.0-0 Bc5 5.Bxf7+
The Semi-Italian Jerome Gambit.
5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.Qh5+ Ng6
Counting this game, I have had this position 10 times, and scored 9 1/2 points. I was feeling comfortable, while my opponent was already eating into his time.
8.Qd5+
It is, of course, possible to capture the Bishop directly with 8.Qxc5, (see RomanDurdis - ifufocop, FICS, 2005, abhailey - cumelen,mm Open Fast #1, net-chess.com, 2008 and Black Puma - TWODOGS, JGTourney4, ChessWorld, 2009) but I prefer the "nudge" to give my opponents more to think about.
8...Ke8
Alternatives: 8...Kf8 9.Qxc5+ d6 (9...N8e7 10.Nc3 b6 11.Qe3 Bb7 12.f4 d5 13.f5 d4 14.fxg6+ Kg8 15.Qf4 dxc3 16.Qf7 checkmate, perrypawnpusher - sarBear, blitz FICS, 2009) 10.Qe3 N8e7 11.d4 Kg8 12.Nc3 Kh7 13.f4 Rf8 14.f5 Nh8 15.g4 Kg8 16.g5 hxg5 17.Qxg5 Nf7 18.Qg3 Nc6 19.f6 g5 20.Bxg5 Nxg5 21.Qxg5+ Kf7 22.Qg7+ Ke6 23.d5+ Ke5 24.Qg3+ Kd4 25.Qd3+ Ke5 26.Qg3+ Kd4 27.Qd3+ Ke5 28.Qg3+ Kd4 29.Qd3+ Ke5 30.Qg3+ Kd4 31.Qd3+ Ke5 32.Qg3+ Kd4 draw, perrypawnpusher - pascalwilliams, blitz FICS, 2007; and
8...Kf6 9.Qf5+ Ke7 10.Qxc5+ Ke8 11.f4 d6 12.Qe3 Qf6 13.f5 Ne5 14.d4 Nc4 15.Qg3 Qxd4+ 16.Kh1 Kd7 17.Nc3 b6 18.Bf4 Ba6 19.Rad1 Qc5 20.Qxg7+ Ne7 21.e5 Rag8 22.e6+ Kc6 23.Qxe7 Re8 24.Qd7+ Kb7 25.b3 Nd2 26.Bxd2 Bxf1 27.Rxf1 Qd4 28.f6 Rhf8 29.Nb5 Qxd2 30.Qxc7+ Ka6 31.Qxa7+ Kxb5 32.Qd7+ Ka6 33.e7 Qe2 34.Rg1 Rxf6 35.Qxe8 Rf1 36.Qa8+ Kb5 37.e8Q+ Qxe8 38.Qxe8+ Kb4 39.Rxf1 Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - episodeninetynine, blitz FICS, 2009.
9.Qxc5 d6
Not quite as good is 9...Qe7, as in 10.Qe3 Nf6 11.Nc3 c6 12.f4 b6 13.f5 Ne5 14.d4 Ba6 15.dxe5 Qxe5 16.Re1 Kf7 17.Qf3 Rhe8 18.Bf4 Qc5+ 19.Be3 Qb5 20.Bd4 Qxb2 21.e5 Nd5 22.e6+ Kg8 23.Qg4 Nxc3 24.Qxg7checkmate, perrypawnpusher - Cibola, blitz FICS, 2009.
Creative alternatives are : 9...b6 10.Qe3 Bb7 11.Nc3 Nf6 12.f4 Qe7 13.d3 d6 14.f5 Nf8 15.Bd2 Kd7 16.Rae1 Re8 17.Qd4 Kc8 18.Qa4 Kb8 19.Nb5 Ba6 20.Qxa6 Qd8 21.Qxa7+ Kc8 22.Qa8+ Kd7 23.Qxd8+ Kxd8 24.Bc3 N8d7 25.Nd4 c5 26.Ne6+ Ke7 27.Nxg7 Reg8 28.Bxf6+ Kxf6 29.Ne6 Re8 30.Re3 b5 31.Rg3 b4 32.Rg6+ Black lost on time, perrypawnpusher - BHAseagull, blitz FICS, 2010; and
9...N8e7 10.f4 d6 11.Qe3 Rf8 12.f5 Ne5 13.d4 Ng4 14.Qg3 h5 15.h3 Nf6 16.e5 Ne4 17.Qe3 d5 18.f6 gxf6 19.exf6 Nc6 20.Qh6 Rf7 21.Bg5 Nxd4 22.Nc3 Nxg5 23.Qxg5 Ne6 24.Qg8+ Rf8 25.f7+ Ke7 26.Qg6 Qd7 27.Rae1 c6 28.Qf6+ Kd6 29.Qe5+ Ke7 30.Qf6+ Kd6 31.Qe5+ Ke7 32.Qxh5 a6 33.Qg5+ Kd6 34.Qe5+ Ke7 35.Qg7 Kd8 36.Rxe6 Qxe6 37.Qxf8+ Kc7 38.Qe8 Bd7 39.Qxe6 Bxe6 40.f8Q Rxf8 41.Rxf8 b5 42.g4 Kd7 43.Kg2 Ke7 44.Ra8 d4 45.Ne2 b4 46.Rxa6 Bc4 47.Rxc6 Bxe2 48.Kf2 Bb5 49.Rb6 Ba4 50.b3 Bd7 51.Rxb4 Kf6 52.Rxd4 Bb5 53.a4 Be8 54.a5 Kg5 55.Kg3 Bc6 56.a6 Bh1 57.h4+ Kf6 58.a7 Ke5 59.Rd8 Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - apinheiro, blitz FICS, 2010.
10.Qe3 Nf6
Or 10...Qf6 11.f4 N8e7 12.Nc3 c6 13.f5 Ne5 14.d4 Nc4 15.Qd3 b5 16.b3 Nb6 17.Bf4 Nd7 18.Rae1 Qf7 19.Bxd6 Nf6 20.Bxe7 Kxe7 21.e5 Nd5 22.f6+ Kf8 23.fxg7+ Kxg7 24.Rxf7+ Kxf7 25.Qf3+ Ke7 26.Nxd5+ Kd8 27.Qf6+ Kd7 28.Qe7checkmate, perrypawnpusher - saltos, blitz FICS 2009.
Provocative was 10...Ne5 11.d4 Ng4 12.Qg3 N8f6 13.Nc3 Be6 14.h3 Bc4 15.Re1 Qd7 16.hxg4 Nxg4 17.f3 Nf6 18.e5 Nh5 19.exd6+ Kf7 20.Qh2 g6 21.Re7+ Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - Kotimatka, blitz FICS, 2009
11.d4
Slightly better might have been 11.f4 Qe7 12.d3 d5 13.e5 Nd7 14.Nc3 Nb6 15.Qg3 Nh4 16.Bd2 Nf5 17.Qg6+ Kd8 18.Rae1 Nd4 19.f5 Bxf5 20.Rxf5 Nxf5 21.Qxf5 Rf8 22.Qg4 c6 23.b3 Kc7 24.Bf4 Rae8 25.d4 Qe6 26.Qxg7+ Kb8 27.Na4 Nxa4 28.bxa4 Rxf4 29.Rb1 Rg8 30.Qxb7 checkmate perrypawnpusher - LeifPetersen, blitz FICS, 2010.
11...Kf7 12.f4 Re8 13.Nc3 Kg8
Here we have a familiar type of position: Black has castled-by-hand and brought his Rook to the e-file; while White has his "Jerome pawns" ready to advance.
I've taken about a minute of thinking time; my opponent, a good bit more.
It should be like taking a stroll in my own back yard...
14.f5 Ne7
15.h3
Preparing for g2-g4, but without much thought. Later, Rybka pointed out the right way to accomplish this: 15.Qg3 Kh7 16.Qh4 Rf8 17.Bg5 Qd7 18.Rad1 Qc6 19.Bxf6 Rxf6 20.g4
analysis diagram
Black would still have an edge, but White would have his thematic pawn play.
15...Nxf5
Ouch! The e-pawn is pinned... Even worse would have been: 15...d5, when White would have to give up the exchange, either by 16.e5 Nxf5 17.Rxf5 Bxf5 or (according to Rybka) 16.Qg3 dxe4 17.Bxh6 Qxd4+ 18.Kh1 Nh5 19.Qg5 Nxf5 20.Rxf5 Bxf5 21.Qxh5 Rf8 22.Bf4.
16.Qd3 Nh4
At this point I started using up thinking time. I found a way to complicate things, and made my move.
17.Bf4
Oh, no! Where did that come from?? That wasn't what I was thinking about at all...
While I awaited the killing blow, I consoled myself with something IM Gary Lane wrote in one of his "Opening Lanes" columns at ChessCafe:
It is always fun to find an opening which can cause confusion with something unusual. The psychological impact can be huge and the hapless opponent is obliged to consume large amounts of time coping with the new situation.ICCF Senior IM Tim Harding was equally philosophical in one of his "The Kibitzer" columns, also at ChessCafe
One of Black's (psychological) problems is that... looks so obviously unsound that it is hard to decide which "refutation" to adopt. Psychologically, opponents often don't play in a stable and rational way when they believe their game is won from a very early stage and they tend to underestimate their opponentsLane and Harding were not writing specifically about the Jerome Gambit, but they could have been.
perrypawnpusher - KenWhitaker
blitz 6 12, FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6
The Semi-Italian Opening.
4.0-0 Bc5 5.Bxf7+
The Semi-Italian Jerome Gambit.
5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.Qh5+ Ng6
Counting this game, I have had this position 10 times, and scored 9 1/2 points. I was feeling comfortable, while my opponent was already eating into his time.
8.Qd5+
It is, of course, possible to capture the Bishop directly with 8.Qxc5, (see RomanDurdis - ifufocop, FICS, 2005, abhailey - cumelen,mm Open Fast #1, net-chess.com, 2008 and Black Puma - TWODOGS, JGTourney4, ChessWorld, 2009) but I prefer the "nudge" to give my opponents more to think about.
8...Ke8
Alternatives: 8...Kf8 9.Qxc5+ d6 (9...N8e7 10.Nc3 b6 11.Qe3 Bb7 12.f4 d5 13.f5 d4 14.fxg6+ Kg8 15.Qf4 dxc3 16.Qf7 checkmate, perrypawnpusher - sarBear, blitz FICS, 2009) 10.Qe3 N8e7 11.d4 Kg8 12.Nc3 Kh7 13.f4 Rf8 14.f5 Nh8 15.g4 Kg8 16.g5 hxg5 17.Qxg5 Nf7 18.Qg3 Nc6 19.f6 g5 20.Bxg5 Nxg5 21.Qxg5+ Kf7 22.Qg7+ Ke6 23.d5+ Ke5 24.Qg3+ Kd4 25.Qd3+ Ke5 26.Qg3+ Kd4 27.Qd3+ Ke5 28.Qg3+ Kd4 29.Qd3+ Ke5 30.Qg3+ Kd4 31.Qd3+ Ke5 32.Qg3+ Kd4 draw, perrypawnpusher - pascalwilliams, blitz FICS, 2007; and
8...Kf6 9.Qf5+ Ke7 10.Qxc5+ Ke8 11.f4 d6 12.Qe3 Qf6 13.f5 Ne5 14.d4 Nc4 15.Qg3 Qxd4+ 16.Kh1 Kd7 17.Nc3 b6 18.Bf4 Ba6 19.Rad1 Qc5 20.Qxg7+ Ne7 21.e5 Rag8 22.e6+ Kc6 23.Qxe7 Re8 24.Qd7+ Kb7 25.b3 Nd2 26.Bxd2 Bxf1 27.Rxf1 Qd4 28.f6 Rhf8 29.Nb5 Qxd2 30.Qxc7+ Ka6 31.Qxa7+ Kxb5 32.Qd7+ Ka6 33.e7 Qe2 34.Rg1 Rxf6 35.Qxe8 Rf1 36.Qa8+ Kb5 37.e8Q+ Qxe8 38.Qxe8+ Kb4 39.Rxf1 Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - episodeninetynine, blitz FICS, 2009.
9.Qxc5 d6
Not quite as good is 9...Qe7, as in 10.Qe3 Nf6 11.Nc3 c6 12.f4 b6 13.f5 Ne5 14.d4 Ba6 15.dxe5 Qxe5 16.Re1 Kf7 17.Qf3 Rhe8 18.Bf4 Qc5+ 19.Be3 Qb5 20.Bd4 Qxb2 21.e5 Nd5 22.e6+ Kg8 23.Qg4 Nxc3 24.Qxg7checkmate, perrypawnpusher - Cibola, blitz FICS, 2009.
Creative alternatives are : 9...b6 10.Qe3 Bb7 11.Nc3 Nf6 12.f4 Qe7 13.d3 d6 14.f5 Nf8 15.Bd2 Kd7 16.Rae1 Re8 17.Qd4 Kc8 18.Qa4 Kb8 19.Nb5 Ba6 20.Qxa6 Qd8 21.Qxa7+ Kc8 22.Qa8+ Kd7 23.Qxd8+ Kxd8 24.Bc3 N8d7 25.Nd4 c5 26.Ne6+ Ke7 27.Nxg7 Reg8 28.Bxf6+ Kxf6 29.Ne6 Re8 30.Re3 b5 31.Rg3 b4 32.Rg6+ Black lost on time, perrypawnpusher - BHAseagull, blitz FICS, 2010; and
9...N8e7 10.f4 d6 11.Qe3 Rf8 12.f5 Ne5 13.d4 Ng4 14.Qg3 h5 15.h3 Nf6 16.e5 Ne4 17.Qe3 d5 18.f6 gxf6 19.exf6 Nc6 20.Qh6 Rf7 21.Bg5 Nxd4 22.Nc3 Nxg5 23.Qxg5 Ne6 24.Qg8+ Rf8 25.f7+ Ke7 26.Qg6 Qd7 27.Rae1 c6 28.Qf6+ Kd6 29.Qe5+ Ke7 30.Qf6+ Kd6 31.Qe5+ Ke7 32.Qxh5 a6 33.Qg5+ Kd6 34.Qe5+ Ke7 35.Qg7 Kd8 36.Rxe6 Qxe6 37.Qxf8+ Kc7 38.Qe8 Bd7 39.Qxe6 Bxe6 40.f8Q Rxf8 41.Rxf8 b5 42.g4 Kd7 43.Kg2 Ke7 44.Ra8 d4 45.Ne2 b4 46.Rxa6 Bc4 47.Rxc6 Bxe2 48.Kf2 Bb5 49.Rb6 Ba4 50.b3 Bd7 51.Rxb4 Kf6 52.Rxd4 Bb5 53.a4 Be8 54.a5 Kg5 55.Kg3 Bc6 56.a6 Bh1 57.h4+ Kf6 58.a7 Ke5 59.Rd8 Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - apinheiro, blitz FICS, 2010.
10.Qe3 Nf6
Or 10...Qf6 11.f4 N8e7 12.Nc3 c6 13.f5 Ne5 14.d4 Nc4 15.Qd3 b5 16.b3 Nb6 17.Bf4 Nd7 18.Rae1 Qf7 19.Bxd6 Nf6 20.Bxe7 Kxe7 21.e5 Nd5 22.f6+ Kf8 23.fxg7+ Kxg7 24.Rxf7+ Kxf7 25.Qf3+ Ke7 26.Nxd5+ Kd8 27.Qf6+ Kd7 28.Qe7checkmate, perrypawnpusher - saltos, blitz FICS 2009.
Provocative was 10...Ne5 11.d4 Ng4 12.Qg3 N8f6 13.Nc3 Be6 14.h3 Bc4 15.Re1 Qd7 16.hxg4 Nxg4 17.f3 Nf6 18.e5 Nh5 19.exd6+ Kf7 20.Qh2 g6 21.Re7+ Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - Kotimatka, blitz FICS, 2009
11.d4
Slightly better might have been 11.f4 Qe7 12.d3 d5 13.e5 Nd7 14.Nc3 Nb6 15.Qg3 Nh4 16.Bd2 Nf5 17.Qg6+ Kd8 18.Rae1 Nd4 19.f5 Bxf5 20.Rxf5 Nxf5 21.Qxf5 Rf8 22.Qg4 c6 23.b3 Kc7 24.Bf4 Rae8 25.d4 Qe6 26.Qxg7+ Kb8 27.Na4 Nxa4 28.bxa4 Rxf4 29.Rb1 Rg8 30.Qxb7 checkmate perrypawnpusher - LeifPetersen, blitz FICS, 2010.
11...Kf7 12.f4 Re8 13.Nc3 Kg8
Here we have a familiar type of position: Black has castled-by-hand and brought his Rook to the e-file; while White has his "Jerome pawns" ready to advance.
I've taken about a minute of thinking time; my opponent, a good bit more.
It should be like taking a stroll in my own back yard...
14.f5 Ne7
15.h3
Preparing for g2-g4, but without much thought. Later, Rybka pointed out the right way to accomplish this: 15.Qg3 Kh7 16.Qh4 Rf8 17.Bg5 Qd7 18.Rad1 Qc6 19.Bxf6 Rxf6 20.g4
analysis diagram
Black would still have an edge, but White would have his thematic pawn play.
15...Nxf5
Ouch! The e-pawn is pinned... Even worse would have been: 15...d5, when White would have to give up the exchange, either by 16.e5 Nxf5 17.Rxf5 Bxf5 or (according to Rybka) 16.Qg3 dxe4 17.Bxh6 Qxd4+ 18.Kh1 Nh5 19.Qg5 Nxf5 20.Rxf5 Bxf5 21.Qxh5 Rf8 22.Bf4.
16.Qd3 Nh4
At this point I started using up thinking time. I found a way to complicate things, and made my move.
17.Bf4
Oh, no! Where did that come from?? That wasn't what I was thinking about at all...
[to be continued]
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Lucky, Lucky, Lucky
After the following game (a Semi-Italian Jerome Gambit, 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6 4.0-0 Bc5 5.Bxf7+) had ended, my opponent, unhappy with his game at the end, had written "blind, blind, blind ". I complimented him on his play and good sportsmanship (in contrast, see "I expected better..."), as I indeed had been "lucky, lucky, lucky."
perrypawnpusher - LeifPetersen
blitz FICS, 2010
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6
4.0-0 Bc5 5.Bxf7+
This is analagous to the Jerome Gambit line 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6, with ...h7-h6 thrown in for Black and 0-0 thrown in for White.
I was surprised to find only 9 other game examples in the New Year's Database.
8.Qd5+
Nudge.
The earliest Semi-Italian Jerome Gambit game in the New Year's Database is RomanDurdis - ifufocop, blitz FICS, 2005, which continued: 8.Qxc5 d6 9.Qd5+ Be6 10.Qxb7 Nf6 11.Qb5 Rf8 12.d3 Kg8 13.c4 Qe7 14.f4 Bd7 15.Qb3 Rab8 16.Qc3 Nh7 17.f5 Ne5 18.Qe1 Nf6 19.Qg3 Kh8 20.Nc3 Qe8 21.Nd5 Nxd5 22.cxd5 Qh5 23.Bf4 Nf7 24.b3 Bb5 25.Rac1 Rb7 26.Rf2 Nd8 27.Qf3 Qxf3 28.Rxf3 Nf7 29.Rff1 Re8 30.Rfe1 Ne5 31.Bxe5 Rxe5 32.a4 Bd7 33.Rb1 c6 34.dxc6 Bxc6 35.d4 Rxe4 36.Rxe4 Bxe4 37.Re1 d5 38.Kf2 Rxb3 39.g4 Rb4 40.Ke3 Rxa4 41.Rc1 Kh7 42.Kf4 Rxd4 43.h4 Rd2 44.Rc7 Rf2+ 45.Ke5 Ra2 46.g5 a5 47.g6+ Kg8 48.Rc8 checkmate.
8...Ke8
Or 8...Kf8 9.Qxc5+ d6 (9...N8e7 10.Nc3 b6 11.Qe3 Bb7 12.f4 d5 13.f5 d4 14.fxg6+ Kg8 15.Qf4 dxc3 16.Qf7 checkmate, perrypawnpusher - sarBear, blitz FICS, 2009) 10.Qe3 N8e7 11.d4 Kg8 12.Nc3 Kh7 13.f4 Rf8 14.f5 Nh8 15.g4 Kg8 16.g5 hxg5 17.Qxg5 Nf7 18.Qg3 Nc6 19.f6 g5 20.Bxg5 Nxg5 21.Qxg5+ Kf7 22.Qg7+ Ke6 23.d5+ Ke5 24.Qg3+ Kd4 25.Qd3+ Ke5 26.Qg3+ Kd4 27.Qd3+ Ke5 28.Qg3+ Kd4 29.Qd3+ Ke5 30.Qg3+ Kd4 31.Qd3+ Ke5 32.Qg3+ Kd4 draw, perrypawnpusher - pascalwilliams, blitz FICS, 2007;
Or 8...Kf6 9.Qf5+ Ke7 10.Qxc5+ Ke8 11.f4 d6 12.Qe3 Qf6 13.f5 Ne5 14.d4 Nc4 15.Qg3 Qxd4+ 16.Kh1 Kd7 17.Nc3 b6 18.Bf4 Ba6 19.Rad1 Qc5 20.Qxg7+ Ne7 21.e5 Rag8 22.e6+ Kc6 23.Qxe7 Re8 24.Qd7+ Kb7 25.b3 Nd2 26.Bxd2 Bxf1 27.Rxf1 Qd4 28.f6 Rhf8 29.Nb5 Qxd2 30.Qxc7+ Ka6 31.Qxa7+ Kxb5 32.Qd7+ Ka6 33.e7 Qe2 34.Rg1 Rxf6 35.Qxe8 Rf1 36.Qa8+ Kb5 37.e8Q+ Qxe8 38.Qxe8+ Kb4 39.Rxf1 Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - episodeninetynine, blitz FICS, 2009.
9.Qxc5 d6
An alternate was 9...Qe7 10.Qe3 Nf6 11.Nc3 c6 12.f4 b6 13.f5 Ne5 14.d4 Ba6 15.dxe5 Qxe5 16.Re1 Kf7 17.Qf3 Rhe8 18.Bf4 Qc5+ 19.Be3 Qb5 20.Bd4 Qxb2 21.e5 Nd5 22.e6+ Kg8 23.Qg4 Nxc3 24.Qxg7 checkmate, perrypawnpusher - Cibola, blitz FICS, 2009
10.Qe3 Nf6
Or 10...Qf6 11.f4 N8e7 12.Nc3 c6 13.f5 Ne5 14.d4 Nc4 15.Qd3 b5 16.b3 Nb6 17.Bf4 Nd7 18.Rae1 Qf7 19.Bxd6 Nf6 20.Bxe7 Kxe7 21.e5 Nd5 22.f6+ Kf8 23.fxg7+ Kxg7 24.Rxf7+ Kxf7 25.Qf3+ Ke7 26.Nxd5+ Kd8 27.Qf6+ Kd7 28.Qe7 checkmate, perrypawnpusher - saltos, blitz FICS, 2009;
Or 10...Ne5 11.d4 Ng4 12.Qg3 N8f6 13.Nc3 Be6 14.h3 Bc4 15.Re1 Qd7 16.hxg4 Nxg4 17.f3 Nf6 18.e5 Nh5 19.exd6+ Kf7 20.Qh2 g6 21.Re7+ Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - Kotimatka, blitz FICS, 2009.
Interestingly enough, there are 249 games in the New Year's Database with this position – if you take away the current game's ...h7-h6 from Black and 0-0 from White.
On the other hand the current game is the only example coming from the Semi-Italian move order.
(For the record, there are about twice as many Jerome Gambit games as Semi-Italian games in the Database.)
11.f4 Qe7
I have included references to my games to show that I was not a stranger to this opening variation. Still, there were many things for me to figure out.
12.d3 d5
For the next dozen or so moves, Rybka grumped after the game that LeifPetersen and I were not making the best moves. True, we traded small advantages back and forth, but, then again, we are carbon-based, not silicon-based.
13.e5 Nd7
14.Nc3 Nb6 15.Qg3 Nh4
Focusing on the f5 square, where future action will take place.
16.Bd2 Nf5 17.Qg6+ Kd8 18.Rae1 Nd4
I didn't think that the pawn on c2 was worth chasing after. Neither did my opponent.
19.f5 Bxf5 20.Rxf5 Nxf5 21.Qxf5 Rf8
By trading two pieces for a Rook and a pawn, Black has calmed the position, which is about equal. White has a pawn for the exchange, is better developed, and has a safer King. Perhaps the passed pawn will turn out to be something.
22.Qg4 c6 23.b3 Kc7 24.Bf4 Rae8
Black's development is looking threatening.
25.d4 Qe6
The offer of a pawn to open an attacking file. White can grab it safely, if he follows up correctly
26.Qxg7+ Kb8 27.Na4
Ooops...
27...Nxa4 28.bxa4 Rxf4
Down a Rook for a couple of pawns, the only chance that I have left is that my opponent might be as exhilirated as I am depressed...
29.Rb1 Rg8 30.Qxb7 Black checkmate
Okay, after his last move, my opponent was pretty depressed, too. 29...b6 would have been sufficient to cause my resignation.
Indeed, I was lucky, lucky, lucky.
Monday, August 17, 2009
Out of sight, out of mind
When I was putting together yesterday's Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) post – a long game with analysis and diagrams can take a couple of hours – I noticed that I had referenced a game that was in my database, but had not yet shown up on this blog. Playing through the game, I could understand the oversight: it's another bad game.
I suppose that I can take some comfort in the fact that I scored 2.5 point in those 3 bad games – that almost makes up for the poor play.
perrypawnpusher - episodeninetynine
blitz 10 0, FICS, 2009
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6 The Semi-Italian opening.
4.0-0 Bc5 5.Bxf7+ 5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.Qh5+ Ng6
Some of my games have goen otherwise: 7...Ke6 8.Qf5+ Kd6 9.d4 Bxd4 ( 9...Qf6 10.dxe5+ Qxe5 11.Rd1+ ( 11.Bf4 Qxf4 12.Qxf4+ Kc6 13.e5 d5 14.b4 Nf6 15.bxc5 Ne4 16.Qf7 Nxc5 17.Qxg7 Be6; 11.Bf4 Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - joejox, FICS 2009) 11...Bd4 12.Qf8+ Ke6 13.Qe8+ Kf6 14.Qf8+ Ke6 15.Qe8+ Kf6 drawn, perrypawnpusher - Joyus, FICS, 2007) 10.Rd1 c5 11.c3 Ne7 12.Qh5 Kc7 13.cxd4 cxd4 14.Qxe5+ d6 15.Qxd4 Nc6 16.Qxg7+ Bd7 17.Bf4 Rg8 18.Qxh6 Qe7 19.Bxd6+ Qxd6 20.Qxd6+ Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - Lakritzl, FICS 2009;
And 7...Kf6 8.Qf5+ Ke7 9.Qxe5+ Kf7 10.Qd5+ Kf6 11.e5+ Kg6 12.Qxc5 d6 13.exd6 Qxd6 14.Qxd6+ cxd6 15.Nc3 Bf5 16.d3 Rc8 17.Be3 a6 18.Bd4 Nf6 19.Rae1 Rhe8 20.f3 Kh7 21.Bxf6 gxf6 22.Rxe8 Rxe8 23.Kf2 Kg6 24.Re1 Rc8 25.Re7 Rb8 26.Ne4 Bxe4 27.fxe4 b5 28.Rd7 Rb6 29.c3 b4 30.c4 b3 31.a3 f5 Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - bergeruw, FICS 2007
8.Qd5+
As I've said (see "Ugly"), I continue to play this nudge; few others do. For example: 8.Qxc5 d6 9.Qc4+ Be6 10.Qe2 Nf6 11.f4 Re8 12.f5 Bxf5 13.Rxf5 d5 14.e5 Qd7 15.Qh5 c6 16.Nc3 Qc7 17.d4 c5 18.Nxd5 Qd8 19.exf6 gxf6 20.Rxf6+ Qxf6 21.Nxf6 Black resigned, abhailey - cumelen, net-chess, 2008
8...Kf6
Or 8...Kf8 9.Qxc5+ d6 10.Qe3 N8e7 11.d4 Kg8 12.Nc3 Kh7 13.f4 Rf8 14.f5 Nh8 15.g4 Kg8 16.g5 hxg5 17.Qxg5 Nf7 18.Qg3 Nc6 19.f6 g5 20.Bxg5 Nxg5 21.Qxg5+ Kf7 22.Qg7+ Ke6 23.d5+ Ke5 24.Qg3+ Kd4 25.Qd3+ Ke5 26.Qg3+ Kd4 27.Qd3+ Ke5 28.Qg3+ Kd4 29.Qd3+ Ke5 30.Qg3+ Kd4 31.Qd3+ Ke5 32.Qg3+ Kd4 drawn, perrypawnpusher - pascalwilliams, blitz, FICS, 2007;
Or 8...Ke8 9.Qxc5 Qe7 10.Qe3 Nf6 11.Nc3 c6 12.f4 b6 13.f5 Ne5 14.d4 Ba6 15.dxe5 Qxe5 16.Re1 Kf7 17.Qf3 Rhe8 18.Bf4 Qc5+ 19.Be3 Qb5 20.Bd4 Qxb2 21.e5 Nd5 22.e6+ Kg8 23.Qg4 Nxc3 24.Qxg7 checkmate, perrypawnpusher - Cibola, blitz, FICS, 2009
9.Qf5+ Ke7 10.Qxc5+ Ke8 11.f4 d6 12.Qe3
Too much of a reflex action. One subtle difference between the regular Jerome Gambit and the Jerome Gambit coming out of the Semi-Italian opening is that here I had the option of 12.Qh5, pinning and eventually winning the Knight on g6.
That's worth remembering for next time.
12...Qf6 13.f5 Ne5 14.d4 Nc4
Now, where should the Queen go?
15.Qg3
What made sense was 15.Qd3, not this move which drops a pawn.
15...Qxd4+ 16.Kh1 Kd7 17.Nc3 b6
As long as Black is behind in development, White has hope.
18.Bf4 Ba6
This move is consistent, but turns out not to be good. I wish I had realized how not-good it was.
19.Rad1 Qc5
Sometimes there are things going on in a game that neither player recognizes. I was totally unaware that the Black Queen had to go to f6 to stay out of trouble.
20.Qxg7+ Ne7 21.e5
This seemed consistent and good to me, but Rybka later saw it as a blunder, preferring 21.b4 Rag8 22.Qxg8 Nxg8 23.bxc5 bxc5.
21...Rag8 22.e6+ Kc6
On the other hand, Rybka didn't like this move one bit, either, preferring 22...Kd8.
Offsetting blunders, and White is now better.
23.Qxe7 Re8 24Qd7+Kb7 24.b3
Ah, the irony: Rybka shows how "simple" the position actually was – 25.Rd5 Qc6 26.b4 Na3 ( 26...Qxd7 27.exd7 Rd8 28.b5) 27.b5 Nxb5 28.Nxb5 Qxd7 29.exd7 Re7 30.f6 Rxd7 31.Bxh6 Rf7 32.Bg7... I think I'll leave the computer out of the discussion for a while.
25...Nd2 26.Bxd2 Bxf1 27.Rxf1 Qd4
28.f6 Rhf8
In the face of the advancing pawns, Black's play is deteriorating.
29.Nb5 Qxd2 30.Qxc7+ Ka6 31.Qxa7+ Kxb5 32.Qd7+
Overlooking the mate (that I paid two good pieces for!) with 32.Qa4+ Kc5 33.Qc4.
Well, I'm down a Rook now, but those advanced pawns have to count for something.
32...Ka6 33.e7 Qe2 34.Rg1
34...Rxf6 35.Qxe8 Rf1
Threatening mate-in-2, but it is Black's last hurrah...
36.Qa8+ Kb5 37.e8Q+ Qxe8 38.Qxe8+ Kb4 39.Rxf1 Black resigned
I suppose that I can take some comfort in the fact that I scored 2.5 point in those 3 bad games – that almost makes up for the poor play.
perrypawnpusher - episodeninetynine
blitz 10 0, FICS, 2009
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 h6 The Semi-Italian opening.
4.0-0 Bc5 5.Bxf7+ 5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.Qh5+ Ng6
Some of my games have goen otherwise: 7...Ke6 8.Qf5+ Kd6 9.d4 Bxd4 ( 9...Qf6 10.dxe5+ Qxe5 11.Rd1+ ( 11.Bf4 Qxf4 12.Qxf4+ Kc6 13.e5 d5 14.b4 Nf6 15.bxc5 Ne4 16.Qf7 Nxc5 17.Qxg7 Be6; 11.Bf4 Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - joejox, FICS 2009) 11...Bd4 12.Qf8+ Ke6 13.Qe8+ Kf6 14.Qf8+ Ke6 15.Qe8+ Kf6 drawn, perrypawnpusher - Joyus, FICS, 2007) 10.Rd1 c5 11.c3 Ne7 12.Qh5 Kc7 13.cxd4 cxd4 14.Qxe5+ d6 15.Qxd4 Nc6 16.Qxg7+ Bd7 17.Bf4 Rg8 18.Qxh6 Qe7 19.Bxd6+ Qxd6 20.Qxd6+ Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - Lakritzl, FICS 2009;
And 7...Kf6 8.Qf5+ Ke7 9.Qxe5+ Kf7 10.Qd5+ Kf6 11.e5+ Kg6 12.Qxc5 d6 13.exd6 Qxd6 14.Qxd6+ cxd6 15.Nc3 Bf5 16.d3 Rc8 17.Be3 a6 18.Bd4 Nf6 19.Rae1 Rhe8 20.f3 Kh7 21.Bxf6 gxf6 22.Rxe8 Rxe8 23.Kf2 Kg6 24.Re1 Rc8 25.Re7 Rb8 26.Ne4 Bxe4 27.fxe4 b5 28.Rd7 Rb6 29.c3 b4 30.c4 b3 31.a3 f5 Black resigned, perrypawnpusher - bergeruw, FICS 2007
8.Qd5+
As I've said (see "Ugly"), I continue to play this nudge; few others do. For example: 8.Qxc5 d6 9.Qc4+ Be6 10.Qe2 Nf6 11.f4 Re8 12.f5 Bxf5 13.Rxf5 d5 14.e5 Qd7 15.Qh5 c6 16.Nc3 Qc7 17.d4 c5 18.Nxd5 Qd8 19.exf6 gxf6 20.Rxf6+ Qxf6 21.Nxf6 Black resigned, abhailey - cumelen, net-chess, 2008
8...Kf6
Or 8...Kf8 9.Qxc5+ d6 10.Qe3 N8e7 11.d4 Kg8 12.Nc3 Kh7 13.f4 Rf8 14.f5 Nh8 15.g4 Kg8 16.g5 hxg5 17.Qxg5 Nf7 18.Qg3 Nc6 19.f6 g5 20.Bxg5 Nxg5 21.Qxg5+ Kf7 22.Qg7+ Ke6 23.d5+ Ke5 24.Qg3+ Kd4 25.Qd3+ Ke5 26.Qg3+ Kd4 27.Qd3+ Ke5 28.Qg3+ Kd4 29.Qd3+ Ke5 30.Qg3+ Kd4 31.Qd3+ Ke5 32.Qg3+ Kd4 drawn, perrypawnpusher - pascalwilliams, blitz, FICS, 2007;
Or 8...Ke8 9.Qxc5 Qe7 10.Qe3 Nf6 11.Nc3 c6 12.f4 b6 13.f5 Ne5 14.d4 Ba6 15.dxe5 Qxe5 16.Re1 Kf7 17.Qf3 Rhe8 18.Bf4 Qc5+ 19.Be3 Qb5 20.Bd4 Qxb2 21.e5 Nd5 22.e6+ Kg8 23.Qg4 Nxc3 24.Qxg7 checkmate, perrypawnpusher - Cibola, blitz, FICS, 2009
9.Qf5+ Ke7 10.Qxc5+ Ke8 11.f4 d6 12.Qe3
Too much of a reflex action. One subtle difference between the regular Jerome Gambit and the Jerome Gambit coming out of the Semi-Italian opening is that here I had the option of 12.Qh5, pinning and eventually winning the Knight on g6.
That's worth remembering for next time.
12...Qf6 13.f5 Ne5 14.d4 Nc4
Now, where should the Queen go?
15.Qg3
What made sense was 15.Qd3, not this move which drops a pawn.
15...Qxd4+ 16.Kh1 Kd7 17.Nc3 b6
As long as Black is behind in development, White has hope.
18.Bf4 Ba6
This move is consistent, but turns out not to be good. I wish I had realized how not-good it was.
19.Rad1 Qc5
Sometimes there are things going on in a game that neither player recognizes. I was totally unaware that the Black Queen had to go to f6 to stay out of trouble.
20.Qxg7+ Ne7 21.e5
This seemed consistent and good to me, but Rybka later saw it as a blunder, preferring 21.b4 Rag8 22.Qxg8 Nxg8 23.bxc5 bxc5.
21...Rag8 22.e6+ Kc6
On the other hand, Rybka didn't like this move one bit, either, preferring 22...Kd8.
Offsetting blunders, and White is now better.
23.Qxe7 Re8 24Qd7+Kb7 24.b3
Ah, the irony: Rybka shows how "simple" the position actually was – 25.Rd5 Qc6 26.b4 Na3 ( 26...Qxd7 27.exd7 Rd8 28.b5) 27.b5 Nxb5 28.Nxb5 Qxd7 29.exd7 Re7 30.f6 Rxd7 31.Bxh6 Rf7 32.Bg7... I think I'll leave the computer out of the discussion for a while.
25...Nd2 26.Bxd2 Bxf1 27.Rxf1 Qd4
28.f6 Rhf8
In the face of the advancing pawns, Black's play is deteriorating.
29.Nb5 Qxd2 30.Qxc7+ Ka6 31.Qxa7+ Kxb5 32.Qd7+
Overlooking the mate (that I paid two good pieces for!) with 32.Qa4+ Kc5 33.Qc4.
Well, I'm down a Rook now, but those advanced pawns have to count for something.
32...Ka6 33.e7 Qe2 34.Rg1
34...Rxf6 35.Qxe8 Rf1
Threatening mate-in-2, but it is Black's last hurrah...
36.Qa8+ Kb5 37.e8Q+ Qxe8 38.Qxe8+ Kb4 39.Rxf1 Black resigned
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)