Sometimes I defend the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) – and sometimes I defend against it.
Ta - dah! We have now transposed into a "modern" Jerome Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.d3 Nf6 -- of which I have 75 examples in my database. Did I feel pressure to "throw" the game? No way! Especially not against a "modern" variation!
7.c3 d5 8.exd5 Qxd5 9.c4 Qd4 10.0-0 Ng4 11.Qf3 Qd7 12.Re1 h6 13.Ne4 Bb4 14.Nbc3 Nd4 15.Qd1 Qf5 16.f3 Nf6 17.a3 Bd7 18.axb4 Qg6 19.Ng3 Nf5 20.Rxe5 Kh7 21.Nxf5 Bxf5 22.Nd5 Nxd5 23.cxd5 Rhf8 24.d4 Bh3 25.g3 Qf6 26.Bf4 Rf7 27.Re4 b5 28.g4 Qh4 29.Qe2 a6 30.d6 cxd6 31.Bxd6 Raa7 32.g5 Qxg5+ 33.Bg3 h5 34.Kh1 Qg6 35.Rc1 Rad7 36.Rc8 Rxd4 37.Rxd4 Bxc8 38.Rd8 Bb7 39.Rd3 Qg4 40.Kg2 h4 41.Re3 hxg3 42.hxg3 Qxb4 43.Qd3+ g6 44.Re6 Bxf3+ 45.Kg1 Qc5+ 46.Kh2 Qh5+ 47.Kg1 Qh1+ 48.Kf2 Be4+ 49.Ke3 Qf3+ White resigns, plummy - SIRMO, www.chessworld.net 2007
"Chopping wood" brings me ever closer to a piece-up endgame, but my opponent would have done better here to bust up my pawn structure a bit with 19.Qxg5.
Black is clearly winning. He has only one small problem.
This is weaker than 34.Rf2, but White still has high hopes.
Good enough, but consistent with the King march was 37...Rxf3+
Oh, yes, that "small problem": the time control was game in 4 minutes, so at the end, even in a winning position, I was so short of time that I had to force the draw and lose a half-point.
bushytail - perrypawnpusher
blitz game 4 0 FICS 2008
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5
Although my favorite defense is the French, I have recently been answering 1.e4 with 1...e5, in the hopes that someone might play the evil Jerome Gambit against me...
4.d3 Nf6 5.Bxf7+ Kxf7
Ta - dah! We have now transposed into a "modern" Jerome Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.d3 Nf6 -- of which I have 75 examples in my database. Did I feel pressure to "throw" the game? No way! Especially not against a "modern" variation!
By the way, my opponent was rated about 250 points above me – for whatever that is worth – and so probably felt completely justified in offering me "Jerome Gambit odds."
6.Ng5+
Not a very popular (or successful) choice, although it showed up 5 times in the 2007 ChessWorld.net Jerome Gambit tournament, and more recently in a 2008 one (Sir Osis of the Liver - Blackburne, ChessWorld.net, 2008, 0-1, 33)
An alternative: 6.0-0 d6 7.Nbd2 h5 8.Nb3 h4 9.c3 Nh5 10.d4 Bb6 11.Bg5 Qd7 12.Bxh4 Nf4 13.dxe5 Qg4 14.Bg3 Nxg2 15.Kxg2 Qh3+ 16.Kg1 Rh5 17.exd6 Bg4 18.dxc7 Kg8 19.Nbd4 Nxd4 20.cxd4 Rf8 21.Qb3+ Kh7 22.Ne5 Bxc7 23.Nxg4 Qxg4 24.Qxb7 Bb6 25.Rad1 Rf6 26.Rd3 Rfh6 27.f3 Qg5 28.e5 Rxh2 29.Qe4+ Kh8 30.Qg4 Rh1+ 31.Kg2 R1h5 32.Qxg5 Rxg5 33.f4 Rg4 34.d5 Kg8 35.Re1 g5 36.e6 Kf8 37.e7+ Ke8 38.Rc3 Bd8 39.Rc8 gxf4 40.exd8Q+ Kf7 41.Qd7+ Kg6 42.Rg8+ Kh5 43.Qxg4 checkmate, Johnstone - Egan, IECG email 1999
6...Kg8
6...Kf8 7.c3 d5 8.h3 dxe4 9.Nxe4 Nxe4 10.dxe4 Qf6 11.0-0 Be6 12.Be3 Bxe3 13.fxe3 Qxf1+ 14.Qxf1+ Ke7 15.Nd2 Na5 16.b3 Rhf8 17.Nf3 Rf6 18.Qb5 b6 19.Qxe5 Nc6 20.Qxc7+ Black resigned, tmitchell - islanderfan, net-chess.com 2006
7.Be3 TN
7.c3 d5 8.exd5 Qxd5 9.c4 Qd4 10.0-0 Ng4 11.Qf3 Qd7 12.Re1 h6 13.Ne4 Bb4 14.Nbc3 Nd4 15.Qd1 Qf5 16.f3 Nf6 17.a3 Bd7 18.axb4 Qg6 19.Ng3 Nf5 20.Rxe5 Kh7 21.Nxf5 Bxf5 22.Nd5 Nxd5 23.cxd5 Rhf8 24.d4 Bh3 25.g3 Qf6 26.Bf4 Rf7 27.Re4 b5 28.g4 Qh4 29.Qe2 a6 30.d6 cxd6 31.Bxd6 Raa7 32.g5 Qxg5+ 33.Bg3 h5 34.Kh1 Qg6 35.Rc1 Rad7 36.Rc8 Rxd4 37.Rxd4 Bxc8 38.Rd8 Bb7 39.Rd3 Qg4 40.Kg2 h4 41.Re3 hxg3 42.hxg3 Qxb4 43.Qd3+ g6 44.Re6 Bxf3+ 45.Kg1 Qc5+ 46.Kh2 Qh5+ 47.Kg1 Qh1+ 48.Kf2 Be4+ 49.Ke3 Qf3+ White resigns, plummy - SIRMO, www.chessworld.net 2007
7...Bxe3 8.fxe3 h6 9.Nf3 Kh7 10.0-0 Rf8 11.Nc3 d6
Standard defensive technique against a modern Jerome Gambit variation: castle by hand, develop, exchange pieces when appropriate.
12.Nd5 Nxd5 13.exd5 Ne7 14.e4 Bg4
This move allows White the possibility of 15.Ng5+ hxg5 16.Qxg4, weakening my King position a bit, so it is probably not the most accurate move.
This move allows White the possibility of 15.Ng5+ hxg5 16.Qxg4, weakening my King position a bit, so it is probably not the most accurate move.
15...Ng6 16.Rf2 Bxf3 17.Rxf3 Rxf3 18.gxf3 Qg5+ 19.Qg2
"Chopping wood" brings me ever closer to a piece-up endgame, but my opponent would have done better here to bust up my pawn structure a bit with 19.Qxg5.
19...Qxg2+ 20.Kxg2 Rf8
Black is clearly winning. He has only one small problem.
21.Rf1 Nf4+ 22.Kf2 g5 23.Ke3 Kg6 24.c4 Kf6 25.b4 Ke7 26.a4 Kd7 27.Rh1 c6 28.Rc1 Ng6 29.h3 Nh4 30.Rf1 Rf4 31.a5 b6 32.dxc6+ Kxc6 33.axb6 axb6 34.b5+
This is weaker than 34.Rf2, but White still has high hopes.
34...Kc5 35.Rf2 Kb4 36.Rf1 Kc3 37.Rf2 Ng6
Good enough, but consistent with the King march was 37...Rxf3+
38.Rf1 Ne7 39.Rc1+ Kb2 40.Rf1 Kc2 41.Rf2+ Kb3 42.Rf1 Ng6 43.Rb1+ Ka2 44.Rf1 Nh4 45.Rf2+ Kb3 46.Rf1 Ng2+ 47.Kf2 Nh4 48.Ke3 Ng2+ 49.Kf2 Nh4 50.Ke3 Ng2+ Draw
Oh, yes, that "small problem": the time control was game in 4 minutes, so at the end, even in a winning position, I was so short of time that I had to force the draw and lose a half-point.
7.Qxe5 d6 8.Qxh8 Qh4 9.0-0 Bd7
Something new! Standard is 9...Nf6.
We have reached a Queenless middlegame, and White clearly has the advantage. If he is subsequently out-played by the computer (rated 1,000 points above him), that should not be attributed to the Jerome Gambit nor reflect poorly on RevvedUp.
Black has been chipping away at the White advantage, and now has a pawn for the exhange, but the game is even.
A very complicated ending has arisen, where RevvedUp is holding his own. Impressive.
More precise is 38.Kd2, but I think White can still hold the position. His King is active, his Rook can either capture or check as needed, and it is very difficult for Black to make headway.
My database has the game ending here with a draw. I must have gotten something mixed up, as Black has a clear win. Perhaps there was some kind of move or time stipulation?
