Jerome Gambit: Meanwhile

Having played the Jerome Gambits currently available to me in the second round of the "Italian Game Classic" tournament at Chess.com (I have Black in one game, so I will have one more chance this round, after that contest is completed), I have just started play in the second round of the "Italian Game Battlegrounds" tournament at Chess.com, as well. I have Black in one game, but White in another - so, another Jerome Gambit!

I will share the game here, when it is completed.

Jerome Gambit: A Way Out of the Woods (Part 2)

[continued from previous post]

My second Jerome Gambit, in the second round of the "Italian Game Classic" tournament at Chess.com, was a battle. I flailed around for a while, trying to put together a decent plan. In the end, it was the pawns.

perrypawnpusher - FedeMamut
Italian Game Classic, Chess.com 2019

12.Bg5 

This move is often thematic in the Jerome Gambit. However, when the game was over and I submitted it for Chess.com's computer analysis, the verdict was that while 12.Bg5 was "good", 12.h4 was "best". However, in the same position, I would choose my move, again, instead of weakening my Kingside.

12...Qe5 

Unpinning the Knight, moving the Queen to a more active post - and offering to exchange Queens. With Black's dark squared Bishop still holding back my f-pawn, I wasn't sure what my best way forward would be - but it certainly wasn't exchanging Queens. 

13.Bf4 Qd4 14.Be3 Qb4 15.Bxc5 Qxc5 

Never mind what the Chess.com computer said about the past few moves (I am sure that you can guess) - I have gotten rid of the pinning Bishop, and Black's Queen will have to stay on the a7-g1 diagonal to keep my f-pawn at home.

16.Rae1 h4 17.Qf4 Qe5 18.Qd2 Be6

19.f4 

Ta dah!

"Good", but 19.h3 was "best". Maybe so, but how does White follow up? The Chess.com computer's move would have led me further into the wilderness.

19...Qd4+ 20.Kh1 h3 21.g3 a5 

This move reminded me, fondly, of the Fidelity Chess Challenger 7, a dedicated chess computer (running on the 8-bit Z80 cpu) which came out in 1979. Whenever it assessed its position as good, but didn't have a way forward, it would often launch one of it's Rook pawns.

I was skeptical of my opponent's move when he played it, as it seemed like it gave me a free tempo, but the Chess.com computer later labelled it as "good". I figured that it was time to strike in the middle, and, of course, played another "inaccuracy".

22.e5 

The computer preferred 22.Ne2. That is an interesting move, and Stockfish 10 (at 35 ply), afterwards, could barely differentiate it from 22.Nd1 and 22.f5 (they were within 4/100th of a pawn of each other!). That last move held the possibility of White following up with Rf1-f4, and then g4 and a later g5, so I should have given it consideration.

22...Nd5

Okay, this is a "blunder", but it is helpful to understand why.

When White's pawn advances in the Jerome Gambit, the question for Black is often "to exchange or not?" Black decided not to, in our game, but he overlooked the better 22...Bd5+, probably because the piece can be snapped off right away with 23.Nxd5. After 23...Qxd5+ 24.Kg1 Qd4+ 25.Kh1 Qd5+, etc, Black would have a draw - but why would he want it? Instead, 25...Nd7 would keep Black's advantage, as after 26.e6, the pawn could easily be blockaded.

Black's move gave me a tempo, and I spent it on the "Jerome pawns". 

23.f5 Bg8 

24.e6

I could not figure out how to make 24.f6 work, and, therefore, settled for blocking in Black's light square Bishop - which often gets blocked in (or neglected) on the Queenside. The g-pawn looked like it had a future in a supporting role.

Black's next few moves show that he wasn't sure how to continue, either.

24...Nxc3 25.bxc3 Qf6 26. g4 Qh6 

It is true that 27.Qxh6 now would turn the advantage back over to Black, but I was not interested in anything so peaceful. Besides, there was another tempo to find for my "Jerome pawns".

27.g5 Qh5 28.Qf4 

Certainly, 28.f6 also would work here, but the text targeted Black's pawn at d6, giving White's Queen entrance behind enemy lines. The f-pawn would have its day.

28...Qe8 29.f6 g6 30.Qxd6+ Black resigned

(I just noticed that I still had all 8 of my pawns.)

Jerome Gambit: A Way Out of the Woods (Part 1)

My second win with the Jerome Gambit, in the second round of the "Italian Game Classic" tournament at Chess.com, was a scary one. My opponent played aggressively and had some very interesting ideas. At one point, I decided to trust the "Jerome pawns" and threw them forward - backed up by my Rooks. It wasn't the "best" play, but it was enough to shake my opponent and give me a way out of the woods. I gathered in the full point.

The game is fun to play over, but do not overlook the notes - especially if you plan on playing (or defending against) the Jerome Gambit.

perrypawnpusher - FedeMamut
Italian Game Classic, Chess.com 2019

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ 

After the game was over, I ran it through the computer at Chess.com. I was delighted to see that it marked "4.Bxf7+" as a "book" move. I decided to rely on the analysis for my notes here.

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ 

The Chess.com computer commented that this move is "excellent", although 6.d4 is "best".

For the record, The Database has 4,442 games with 6.Qh5+ (White scores 56%) and 2,024 games with 6.d4 (White scores 55%). So, 6.Qh5+ is twice as popular as 6.d4, but both moves score similarly.

6...Kf8 

The Jerome Defense to the Jerome Gambit, played successfully by Alonzo Wheeler Jerome in two correspondence games against Daniel Jaeger in 1880.

Again, the computer commented that this move is "excellent", although 6...Ke6 is "best".

The Database has 665 games with 6...Kf8, with White scoring 50%, while it has 1,102 games with 6...Ke6, with White scoring 53%. Black has chosen "the road less followed", but one that has been better for the defenders.

7.Qxe5 d6 

Once more, the computer opined that while 7...d6 was "excellent", 7...d5 was "best". I was beginning to think that when it came to the end of the game, it would suggest that FedeMamut came in "second place", while I came in "next to last".

Still, The Database has 412 games with 7...d6, with White scoring 48%. Of note, there are only 2 games with 7...d5, and Black won both of them.

8.Qg3 Qe7 

The computer said this move was an "inaccuracy", while 8...Nf6 was "best". Still, it rated Black as clearly better.

The Database has only 8 games with 8...Qe7, with White scoring 63%.

9.Nc3

Likewise, an "inaccuracy", while 9.d3 would be "best". At this point, I decided to get Stockfish 10's opinion. It agreed with the Chess.com computer. Figures.

For the record, I played 9.d3 in perrypawnpusher - frencheng, 10 5 blitz, FICS, 2010 (1-0, 19)

9...Nf6

Interestingly enough, the Chess.com computer rated this move as "good", but preferred the novelty, 9...h5, as "best". Keep that in mind.

10.d3 c6 11.O-O h5 

The Chess.com computer rated this move as an "inaccuracy", preferring 11...Kf7 as "best". It was looking at Black's King safety, and was recommending that he castle-by-hand.

I like the aggressive pawn move - it threatens White's King's safety, makes active use of Black's Rook, and still leaves Black better. Moreover, in future move suggestions, the computer suggested the weakening h2-h4 for White, an additional benefit of Black's "inaccuracy".

[to be continued]

Jerome Gambit: History in Play

My first win with the Jerome Gambit, in the second round of the "Italian Game Classic" tournament at Chess.com, was a bit of a journey through the opening's history.

An unfortunate slip by my opponent allowed me a tactical shot that brought the game to an early conclusion.

perrypawnpusher - PDX84
Italian Game Classic, Chess.com, 2019

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ 

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ke6 

Black courageously thinks of holding onto both sacrificed pieces. The compter chess analysis at Chess.com, after the game, identified the move as "best".

7.Qf5+

Alonzo Wheeler Jerome first suggested this move in the April 4, 1874 issue of the Dubuque Chess Journal. He also played 7.f4 and 7.O-O in correspondence games against S.A. Charles, and suggested 7.b4 "for analysis"; this was covered in the October, 1881 issue of Brentano's Chess Monthly.

A check of The Database shows 507 games with 7.Qf5+, with White scoring 48%, as opposed to 517 games with 7.f4, with White scoring 61%. There are no games with 7.b4.

7...Kd6 8.f4 Qf6 9.fxe5+ Qxe5 10.Qf3 

Not 10.Qxe5+ this time. That move has given me mixed results, and a loss most recently: perrypawnpusher - djdave28, Italian Game Tournament, Chess.com, 2014, (1-0, 22); perrypawnpusher - djdave28, Italian Game Tournament, Chess.com 2015, (1-0, 32); and perrypawnpusher - Altotemmi, Giuoco Piano Tournament, Chess.com, 2016, (0-1, 51). 

The Queen exchange is at least as old as Jerome, A - Jaeger, D, correspondence, 1878 (0-1, 68).

10...Nf6 

This move makes a lot of sense.

Jerome faced 10...Ne7 in a correspondence game against Jaeger in 1878 (0-1, 68).

 Lowe,E - Cudmore,D, correspondence, 1881, continued 10...b5 (½-½, 48).

Keeble,J - Cubitt,J, Norwich 1886, continued 10...c6 (1-0, 17).

11.d3 Ke7 

Black dodges the crudest of threats - 12.Bf4, pinning his Queen to his King. The idea is at least as old as Vazquez - Giraudy, Mexico, 1876 (remove White's Queen Rook) 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ke6 7.Qf5+ Kd6 8.d4 Bxd4 9.c3 Bb6 10.f4 Qf6 11.fxe5+ Qxe5 12.Bf4 Qxf4 13.Qxf4+ Ke7 14.Rf1 Nh6 15.Qe5+ Kd8 16.Qxg7 Re8 17.Qg5+ Re7 18.Rf8 checkmate. Still, I've scored points from this "Optical Illusion" variation of the Jerome Gambit - see "Optical Illusion (1)", "Optical Illusion (2)" and "Disdainful Defender Defense".

Instead, 11...Kc6 was seen in Jerome, A - Colburn, correspondence 1879 (0-1, 34) and Jerome, A - Charles, S.A., correspondence, 1881 (unfinished).

12.Nc3 Bb4 

Pinning the White Knight to keep it off of d5.

Instead:

12...g5 was seen in Jerome, A - Shinkman, W, Iowa, 1874 (0-1, 21);

12...d6 was seen in Jerome, A - Brownson, O, Iowa, 1875 (1-0, 43);

12...c6 was seen in Jerome, A - Amateur, off hand game, 1876 (1-0, 20); and

12...d5 was seen in Jerome, A - Pane, M, correspondence, 1878 (1-0, 41).

13.Bd2

I was amused to see that I had played 13.O-O here, years ago, in perrypawnpusher - PREMK, blitz, FICS, 2005. The idea was that 13...Bxc3 14.bxc3 Qxc3 15.Qg3!? would give White good play for the sacrificed pawn.

13...Rf8 14.O-O d6 

Instead, in the post mortem, Komodo 10 recommended the brutal 14...Bd6, with the idea of forcing exchanges to eliminate White's attacking chances and highlight Black's piece-for-a-pawn advantage, e.g. 15.g3 c6 16.Bf4 Bc5+ 17.Kg2 Qh5 18.Na4 Qxf3+ 19.Rxf3 d6 20.Nxc5 dxc5 21.Raf1 Bg4 22.R3f2 Be6 

15.Nd5+ Black resigned

White will recover his sacrificed piece. He will be a pawn up, with better development and King safety. Black decided not to play on.

Jerome Gambit: Descent Into Rubble

The latest game from Cliff Hardy is a wild affair, concluding with a mad dash to the finish line - er, time control. 

In a 1-minute, no increment, bullet game, you can win, even if your opponent has a forced checkmate - if his flag falls. Just another reason for an opponent to hate the Jerome Gambit.  

I have added some diagrams and a comment or two, in blue; otherwise, the notes are by Cliff. 

Here is a bullet Jerome Gambit game I played today, which most certainly has several errors in it!

Cliff Hardy (2400) - NN (2391)
1 0, Lichess, 2019

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ 

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ g6 

7.Qxe5 Qe7 8.Qf4+

I successfully remembered that taking the rook here is inferior (I think!).

Black is playing Whistler's Defense with 6...g6 and 7...Qe7. Taking the Rook at h8 is complicated, but "theoretically" dangerous for White, although The Database shows a score of over 50% in about 50 games. Check out the earlier post, "Bop!" - Rick

8...Kg7 9.d3 Nf6 10.0-0 Rf8 

Black has effectively castled-by-hand. Given enough time, he will continue to figure things out. Unfortunately, he will not have enough time. - Rick

11.Nc3 d6?!

Stockfish prefers the hard-to-see 11...d5! -++ e.g. 12.exd5?/e5? Ng4! 13.Qg5 Bxf2+.

12.Qh4 Bd4? =+

Missing White's threat - 12...h5 13.Na4 -++ would still have been strong for Black.

13.Bh6+ Kg8 14.Bxf8 Qxf8 15.Kh1 Be6?! =

The perennial inaccuracy for Black in the Jerome Gambit - this bishop move tends to run headlong into White's pawn push f2-f4-f5. Better would have been 15...Qg7 16. f4 Bd7, with a slight advantage for Black. 

16.f4 Re8 17.Nd1? =+

17.Ne2 would have been better, though I had missed that 17...Bxb2? could then have been met by 18.Rab1.

17...Ng4 18.h3 Ne3 19.Nxe3 Bxe3 20.Rf3 Bd4 

21.c3 Bg7 22.Raf1 Qe7??

22...Qf6 23.Qf2 =+

23.Qg3??

Missing the typical Jerome Gambit tactic of utilising the f-pawn with 23.Qxe7 Rxe7 24.f5 gxf5 25.exf5 Bxa2 26.f6! ++-, forking the rook and bishop.

23...Bxa2 24.f5 Bf7??

The Jerome Gambit f-pawn strikes again! Blockading it with 24...gxf5 25.exf5 Qf6 would have left Black with a clear advantage.

25.f6 Bxf6 26.Rxf6 Be6 

27.Qf4 Kg7 28.Qf2 Bg8?

The interference tactic 28...Bf5! would have been better here, though after 29.Rxf5 gxf5 30.exf5 Rf8 31.Qxa7, White would still have had a winning advantage.

29.Rf3 Qe5 30.Qxa7 Qb5 

31.Qd4+ Kh6 32.Qf6 Re5 

33.Qh4+ Kg7 34.Qf6+ Kh6 35.Rf4 Rh5? 

36.Rh4?

Black made the mistake of allowing White to mate in 2 moves with 36.Qf8+ Kg5 37.Rg4 (which White obviously missed!), though Black's position was lost in any case.

 36...Rxh4 37.Qf8+?

The game now descends into rubble. With White having 2.4 seconds left on the clock and Black having double that (exactly 4.8 seconds left), we both started to throw down any move we could think of! Clearly, 37.Qxh4+ would have been a much better move to play (though even after 37.Qf8+?, White still has a winning position).

37...Kg5 38.Qf3 Rg4?? 39.Qg3?? Rxg3 40.Kh2 Qe5 41.Rf5+ and White cheekily won on time.