Tuesday, October 7, 2008

The Great Debate (Part II)


Continuing from Alonzo Wheeler Jerome's The Great Debate:

On the Lincoln side, and seated nearest to him, is a figure, which it is almost certain, is intended to represent Judge Stephen T. Logan. and, if so, he is properly placed, as he was very near to Lincoln, in all his political life.

Next to Logan, is a face which was thought by a lady visitor from Bloomington, to resemble "Old Ike Funk," he, who electrified the Senate, during a session of that body in which the "great war" was under discussion, by an impromptu speech that made him famous.

Standing behind this figure, is that of a patriot so well and so widely known, that few fail to recognize it, yet so little has been said or written about this work, that the grand old man himself, did not know he was represented in that group of great men, until his attention was called to it a short time since. After quite a prolonged examination of the picture, he handed back the opera glass, and said, "I guess you're right, I'll come again, I'll come again." He had been asked if he could identify any other of the faces in the picture. No effort was made to detain him, he was entitled to release from attendance, and to have opportunity to indulge in the thoughts that platform scene suggested, and the memories it brought back to him.

As a lawyer at the Illinois bar, as a member of the Constitutional Convention of 1847, as a State Senator, Colonel of the 14th Illinois Infantry, Major General commanding the 14th Army Corps, as Provisional Governor of Kentucky, as Governor of Illinois, and as United States Senator, General Palmer has rendered his State and Country great and excellent service. Not only for these duties well done, but because of he prominence as a friend of Lincoln, and earnest supporter of the doctrine of opposition to the extension of slavery, is he entitled to the honor of a place by the side of the greatest of our country's great men, as he appears in this marvellous work of art.

Who else may be represented there, few have attempted to suggest. There are twenty figures in the plaque, and Matheny, Judd, Stuart, Lovejoy, Wentworth, Washburn, Browning, might have all been given places there, and some of them may be there. Could we learn who furnished the artist, F. Nicolai, with the photographs and engravings he used, and coached him while doing the work, we might be able to identify every historic face shown in the several plates. To him, as well as to the artist, great credit is due for his selection of subjects for illustration.

It may be, the picture under consideration was intended to present the platform as it appeared at some particular one of the seven joint debates, which took place in 1858, at Ottawa, August, 21st; Freeport, August 27th; Jonesboro, September 15th; Charleston, September 18th; Galesburg, October 7th; Quincy, October 13th, and at Alton, October 15th. If so, it seems probable that the Galesburg debate was selected for this picture, as that appears to have been the most notable of the meetings.

Are there not yet some living, who can tell the names of the representative men occupying the platform with Lincoln and Douglas, on that occasion? True it is, that forty years, just forty years at this writing, have passed since that event, but men who were thirty years of age at that time, are but seventy now, and surely there must be many still with us who can name at least one or two of the men shown on the platform.


graphic by Jeff Bucchino, "The Wizard of Draws"

Monday, October 6, 2008

The Great Debate (Part I)


In his later years, Alonzo Wheeler Jerome, creator of the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) served as a guide at the statehouse in Springfield, Illinois (see "The Man, The Myth, The Legend...").

Thanks to the tireless research efforts of Jerome Gambit Gemeinde member blackburne, we now have a copy of a souvenir booklet that Jerome wrote for those he escorted through the capitol. Titled The Great Debate (1899), it expounds on A Platform Scene in the Seven Joint Discussions between Lincoln and Douglas. One of the Relief Pictures in the Dome of the State Capitol at Springfield, Illinois.

A veteran of the American Civil War (26th Infantry, United States Colored Troops), Jerome was greatly impressed by the efforts of Abraham Lincoln, in is series of debates with Stephen A. Douglas.

In this picture, so entitled by all who remember, and all who are familiar with the written history of the discussion of the question as to the restriction or extension of Slavery, in the territories of the United States, the most conspicuous advocate of the restriction policy, is standing by a table with one hand resting thereon, while the other is held in the well known position of argumentative gesture, slightly raised from the side, with the palm turned outward, seeming to say "Is not that right, and true, and reasonable?"

Lincoln, it is said, used but that one gesture when speaking, and that movement and position of the hand was as natural when making an argument, founded on reason, as the movement of the tongue itself. Certain it is, that in none of the speeches deliver3ed by this great reasoner, was there any deliberate attempt made at oratory merely for applause, but all of the eloquent periods came from a full and sympathetic heart. He made no effort to heighten effect by the aid of swinging arms and clapping hands; by shaking of the head and trembling voice. Calmness, earnestness, sincerity, appeals to reason and to justice, constituted his power to bring others to his view of the question. And let it be said, to the credit of a majority of the people of Illinois, that they were capable of being influenced by right and reason, rather than by subtlety and brilliant oratory.

Lincoln's opponent is seated at the opposite side of the table (looking the physical dwarf and mental giant that he was) full of attention to what his great rival is saying, and, no doubt, endeavoring to frame replies for use when his turn shall have come to address the multitude.

Douglas' friends are grouped on his side of the table, and, while it is clearly manifest that all the faces, save one, as well as those on the Lincoln side, are intended for portraits, the writer has been unable to secure with certainty, the identity of but few of the men there seen, and all attempt to name the others is only conjecture.

The key to the whole series of pictures, or Relief Plaques, as they may be called, cannot be found, and its loss is greatly deplored by all who appreciate the art and the history, which are shown in this beautiful work, not only as to this Lincoln-Douglas plaque, but as to each and every one of the series, ten in number.

At the extreme right of the picture, looking out from under a draped doorway or cabinet, is the face of a colored man, who is standing in an easy position, with one hand placed on the left hip, the other stretched above his head, and resting against the door post. Why is this negro on the Douglas side, instead of on the side of his friend Lincoln?

The key would doubtless explain why. In its absence it may be surmised that, inasmuch as a then recent opinion from Chief Justice Taney, of the Supreme Court of the United States, was being used by Douglas as one of his arguments, one of his friends in these debates, perhaps the artist, placed the woolly head and thick lips there, as an allegorical "Dred Scott" decision, or it may be that the figure with the curtain, is intended to represent the proverbial "woodpile." At least, few visitors notice him, unless their attention is called to him.

A recent visitor, a bright lady from Warsaw, Hancock County, after hearing the above guess as to the reason for the apparent mislocation of the colored man, suggested with a mischievous smile, "Perhaps he is waiting for an order."

Two visitors at the Statehouse who said they knew Judge Anthony Thornton of Shelbyville, expressed the opinion, that the figure seated at the right end of the picture, was intended to represent that great friend of the "Little Giant."

It is well worth while to give this figure careful attention, the pose being that of a man who is forgetting everything else in the deep absorption of following the speaker's argument. he has his left arm resting on the back of the chair, the left foot drawn back under it, and his head held in a listening attitude, the face, the form, and the attitude, being most natural and lifelike. But this is almost equally true of the entire work, there being scarcely an exception.

The faces of the two men who are standing on this, the douglas side of the picture, are fine and strong, with such marked and distinguishing features, that they should be easily recognized b y people who saw and heard the debates. One of them is thought to resemble Wm. A. Richardson, who filled out the unexpired term of Mr. Douglas as United States Senator, excepting the short time that O. H. Browning held the position by appointment.

graphic by Jeff Bucchino, "The Wizard of Draws"





Sunday, October 5, 2008

Blackburne collects...


Jerome Gambit Gemeinde member "blackburne" is our second blog reader/correspondent (see "Trading up" as well as "Looking for a few good Jerome Gambit games..." and "Still Looking for a few good Jerome Gambit games...") to receive a PGN file of the first 210 games referred to on this blog, and a PGN file of the next 250 (actually 272).

If he suddenly gets even better playing the Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) -- don't say that I didn't warn you!

Saturday, October 4, 2008

From the Email Bag...



An interesting email from blackburne includes



...I tried to look up Jerome on Wikipedia, with no success (there's only one person who could write the entry - you!), but I did find that Winston Churchill's mother, who was American of course, had a maiden name of Jerome! It's not a very common name, so I wondered if there could be a family connection? Now that would be interesting.



A connection between Alonzo Wheeler Jerome and Winston Churchill??

That would indeed be interesting.!

As Anne Sebba writes in American Jennie The Remarkable Life of Lady Randolph Churchill

And when Jennie displayed some daring originality or eccentricity the relations would comment: 'How very American. How very Jerome.'

I will see what I can discover. Readers are welcome to join in!

Friday, October 3, 2008

Count one for the Count!

With one game left to be completed, vlad-tepes has won his 7-player double round robin Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) tournament at GameKnot (see "Jerome Gambit and Vlad Tepes", "Jerome Gambit, Vlad Tepes and... Garlic!" and "Jerome Gambit: Return to Transylvania") with an impressive score of 11 points out of 12.

That includes defeating the Jerome Gambit 6 out of 6 tries (ouch!) but also winning with it 5 out of 6 tries. The Jerome Gambit has scored 39% so far.

Here's an interesting game by the tournament winner, foreshortened just when things were getting interesting, by the sunrise, at is were. Pity, as White was getting ready to sink his fangs into his opponent.

vlad-tepes - panga74

www.GameKnot.com 2008

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6 7.Qxc5 d6 8.Qe3 h6 TN 9.d4 N8e7 10.Nc3 Kg8 11.Bd2 a6 12.0-0-0 Kh7 13.f4 Rf8 14.f5 Nh8 15.g4 Nc6 16.h4

Black lost on time

White has an edge, but there is plenty of interesting play ahead.

Next, we see vlad-tepes defending against the Gambit, and making it all look oh-so-easy...


panga74 - vlad-tepes
www.GameKnot.com 2008

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.a3 d6 6.h3 h6 7.d3 Nf6 8.0-0 Rf8 9.Nc3 Kg8 10.Nd5 Nxd5 11.exd5 Nd4 12.Nxd4 Bxd4 13.c3 Bb6 14.Be3 Bxe3 15.fxe3 Rxf1+ 16.Qxf1 Qe7 17.e4 Bd7 18.Qe2 Rf8 19.Rf1 Rxf1+ 20.Qxf1 Qf6 21.Qe2 Qf4 22.Qc2 Qg3 23.Kh1 Qe3 24.c4 b6 25.b4 g5 26.a4 h5 27.b5 g4 28.hxg4 hxg4 29.Qd1 g3 30.Qf1 Qh6+ 31.Kg1 Qh2 checkmate

Stuff like that makes me wonder if I'll ever play 4.Bxf7+ again.

bobbob78 came in second place in the vlad-tepes mini-tournament, scoring 9.5 out of 12, and giving the leader his only loss.

vlad-tepes - bobbob78
www.GameKnot.com 2008

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6 7.Qxc5 d6 8.Qe3 Nf6 9.Nc3



9...Rf8 10.0-0 Bd7 11.f4 Kg8 12.d4 Ng4 13.Qd3 Qh4



White has his pawns up and moving, but Black has castled by hand and is on the counter-attack. A Black Queen at h4 almost always spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e for White.

14.h3 Nf6 15.Bd2

White might have tried 15.f5 followed by Bc1-e3-f2 instead, to achieve the same end.

15...Rae8 16.e5 Nh5 17.Be1 Qd8 18.f5 Ngf4 19.Qc4+ Kh8 20.e6


White is giving it his best shot, but it's not going to be enough.

20...b5 21.Nxb5 Bxb5 22.Qxb5 Qg5 23.Qc6 Nxh3+ 24.Kh2 N3f4 25.g3 Ne2


26.Qe4

The Queen needed to go to Qg2, but in the long run the result would be the same.

26...Nhxg3 27.Bxg3 Qxg3+ White resigned





Thursday, October 2, 2008

rec.games.chess.misc & email


Found on rec.games.chess.misc...

Michael Kramer
Sep 29 1997
Subject: Re: Jerome Gambit

All who have responded to inquiries about the Jerome Gambit lack experience with this extremely fun surprise weapon. The Jerome Gambit may be unsound but it is a true opening which cannot be destroyed with imputity even by master play if masterfully handled. The Jerome Gambit when played against unsuspecting opposition presents them with a ranging queen leaping at an exposed king who must hunt for cover while ruining (usually) easy entry for his King rook.

The Jerome Gambit immediately presents black with the chance to go very wrong and he can smell it! After qh5 there are several plausible looking choices for black and his clock is running while his genitalia are resting on the butcher block! (or mammalia as the case may be!)

All those variations mentioned in the "Chess Openings ancient and Modern" are almost never seen in practical play with ordinary opposition. (some are interesting though and may come foreward.)

If two masters engage in a Jerome Gambit you will see a long difficult game possibly. White may very well lose. Black may very well lose if its a blitz game however. (You should set it up to qh5 on a strong computer/software system on selfplay and see what I mean REALLY..do this, the games can be very very tense and compex).

In club play, every time a cheerful attacker who likes the Jerome gets a chance to play it he'll win. Ill bet on it cause I win with it all the time, all the time, is that clear? All the time.
The Jerome Gambit is a terrific, hilarious, mean son of a bitch in fast play even when a C faces an expert with it. Faster the better of course.

I say all this because I play the damned thing and I love it. Now if everyone was familiar with it the surprise value is down the tubes but the game can still be tough for both sides. and an unfamiliar fight on new turf... what is chess all about anyway?

Alright, Im no master, but in my efforts to complete my monograph with the assistance of a very fine player Ive seen Masters go DOWN against this fellow using the Jerome! "All or Nothing! The Jerome Gambit" (don't hold your breath We've a way to go yet)

The Jerome Gambit disadvantages:
#1 you sac a lot of material.

advantages:
#1 youre opponent doesnt know what timezone hes just been launched into.
#2 you get back a lot of pawns maybe a piece and a delicious king hunt position
#3 Black can go wrong
#4 Black can eat loads time in blitz deciding which obviously crucial move to make after the Jerome debut Qh5.
#5 blacks king rook is often not a player in most of the game.
#6 even if black threads all the needles there is still a great tough and worthwhile game to play, which the better player should still win.
#7 winning can be so wonderfully quick and bloody, HAH!!!!!
#8 Just playing the Jerome against better players in blitz is an advantage. Any non expert will wilt and experts and masters can make some ridiculously conservative and suicidal moves defending against this weirdo.

READ MY LIPS... The Jerome Gambit is Good! If you play like you know youre going to win. Its highly likely you will win easily. Like falling off a log! No kidding! Now keep it to yourself. I dont want to run into a bunch of people who are boning up on Black defensive play. Shshshshshshshsshshshshshshsh! (Tell'em Noiret sent you hehe.)



Paul Onstad
Sep 30 1997
Subject: Re: Jerome Gambit

> If two masters engage in a Jerome Gambit you will see a long difficult
> game possibly.

Unfortunately, the only master who would get involved with the Jerome Gambit would be playing black and the game would be over in less than 20 moves. -Paul



David Hanley
Sep 30 1997
Subject: Re: Jerome Gambit

I've played against the jerome gambit a few times, and won all the games pretty quickly. Part of the problem is that white has sacrificed his two developed pieces.
Could be useful in blitz, though, because it will force black to eat up at least a little time... dave



santiago zorzopulos
Sep 30 1997
Subject: Re: Jerome Gambit

Pardon me, but what is the Jerome Gambit?



Wenj
Sep 30 1997
Subject: Re: Jerome Gambit

> Pardon me, but what is the Jerome Gambit?

Don't bother! It's interesting (actually amusing is a better word), but not even remotely close to sound. If White wants violent chess, there are much better openings! As far as winning on time, does anybody really get any satisfaction from winning on time in a lost position? I hope not! Joe



David Hanley
Oct 1 1997
Subject: Re: Jerome Gambit

> Pardon me, but what is the Jerome Gambit?

1 e4 e5 2 nf3 nc6 3 bc4 bc5 4 bf7+ kf7 5 ne5+ ne5 6 qh5+

As you can see, white will quickly win back a piece. The best antidote, IMO, is to return all the material, and then some: 6 ..... g6! 7 qe5 d6! 8. qh8 qh5

The dual threats of qf2+ and qe4+ are potent. Black will play nf6 caging the queen real soon now, and probably go on to win.

If white doesn't scarf the material black offers black simply has more material and a better position.
dave




Michael Kramer
Sep 30 1997
Subject: "All or Nothing! The Jerome Gambit by Chaim Schmendrik

Where can I get a copy of "All or Nothing! The Jerome Gambit" by Chaim Schmendrik? All this yak about the Jerome and there is a monograph on the thing? Kramer



You can imagine that this last post was very interesting to me, and I spent a lot of time searching for "All or Nothing!"

Finally, an email arrived...


From: yisuhin@attbi.com
To: ekennedy@gcfn.org
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 4:58 AM
Subject: attn rick kennedy re the jerome gambit.

I am the Michael Kramer who made the desperate plea for a copy of All or Nothing! The Jerome Gambit by Chiam Schmendrick back in 97

Ive always liked to play the Jerome when the opportunity arose. Its pretty obviously a train wreck of an opening but its usually fun to play as white at any speed against an unsuspecting opponent. A good player who remains calm as black will be ok but it so rarely appears in play that if white keeps a straight face and plays like he thinks he's going to win you have a chance if your opponent is just a bit tentative.

I was fooling with a monograph called All or Nothing! The Jerome Gambit with plausible examples of play, not the wonderful historical research you've done, which I found very interesting.

I just put that inquiry into the group stream as a hoot.

Chiam Schmendrick is a yiddish character name not referring to anyone specific, just a funny name implying a stupid guy. It was used in east europe to refer to an idiot or foolish person. Fairly common phrase in USA through the 50s or so among jewish people.

I do recall that there was a strong guy or some fellows trying to find some sound lines in the Jerome a few years ago near the time of one of the live world championships on ICC but I cant recall who they were. Im sure they didnt find much but there was some talk about it. It would have been interesting to locate their analysis or efforts.

Jerome Gambit. Just a funny little byway in chess that can be enjoyable if you get the right opponent and are in the right mood. I use to play a lot of 0 1 on ICC (start with 10 seconds and get one second increment with each move, fastest possible game available there NO THINKING!! premoving almost mandatory) The Jerome is mighty fun in that environment. No time to scratch your head and say HEY! this is stupid! You need to reply swiftly and correctly. Correct is possible, swift is a little harder. heh.

Michael G. KramerLos Angeles
Californiaguitars.fornovices.com

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Trading up!

Chessfriend Martin Moller (who plays at the Internet Chess Club as "Moller" and who posts at ChessGames) is the first reader to send in a Jerome Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+) game since requested (see "Looking for a few good Jerome Gambit games..." and "Still Looking for a few good Jerome Gambit games...").

As a result, he will receive a PGN file of the first 210 games referred to on this blog, and a PGN file of the next 250 (actually 272) as well.
Let's take a look at his contribution -- a 5 minute blitz game, against a player rated 200 points above him.

Moller - whitestone
ICC blitz game 2008

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6



7.Qxc5

7.Qd5+ Ke8 8.Qxc5 d6 9.Qc3 Nf6 10.d3 c6 11.0-0 Kd7 12.f4 Qb6+ 13.Kh1 Kc7 14.Qe1 Re8 15.b3 Nd5 16.Qg3 Nb4 17.Na3 Bd7 18.c3 Nxa2 19.f5 Ne5 20.d4 Qxb3 21.dxe5 dxe5 22.Rb1 Qxc3 23.Be3 a6 24.Qxg7 b5 25.Rf3 Kc8 26.Rd1 Rd8 27.Bb6 Kb7 28.Bxd8 Black resigned, Jerome - Brownson, USA, 1875

7...d6 8.Qc3 Nf6




9.0-0


9.d3 Rf8 10.Bg5 h6 11.Bxf6 gxf6 12.Nd2 Be6 13.0-0-0 c5 14.g3 b5 15.Nb3 a5 16.f4 b4 17.Qd2 Bxb3 18.cxb3 Rh8 19.Kb1 a4 20.bxa4 Rxa4 21.b3 Ra3 22.d4 Qa8 23.Qe2 Re8 24.f5 Nf8 25.Rhe1 Nh7 26.dxc5 dxc5 27.Rd7+ Kg8 28.Qg4+ Black resigned, Banks - Pinfold, Halesowen v Bushbury 2000

9...Re8 10.d3

10...Be6

10...h6 11.f4 Kg8 12.Be3 c5? 13.Nd2 Ng4 14.Rae1 Nxe3 15.Rxe3 b6 16.Rg3 Kh7 17.f5 Ne5 18.Nf3 Qf6 19.Qd2 Bb7 20.Nxe5 dxe5 21.Rg6 Qd8 22.Rf3 Bxe4! 23.Rfg3 Re7 24.Qf2 Rd7 25.h3 Bb7? 26.f6 gxf6 27.Rxf6 Rg7 28.Qf5+ Kg8 29.Qe6+ Kh8 30.Rxh6+ Black resigned, Anonymous - Anonymous, Club Game (Gambits Accepted - Fletcher);


10...b6 11.Bg5 Ne5 12.f4 Neg4 13.h3 Ne3 14.Rf3 Nd1 15.Qb3+ Be6 16.c4 Nxb2 17.Qxb2 h6 18.Bxf6 Qxf6 19.e5 Qh4 20.Nd2 a5 21.f5 Bd7 22.e6+ Bxe6 23.fxe6+ Kxe6 24.Qxg7 Rg8 25.Qf7+ Ke5 26.Qd5 checkmate, Nestor250168 - NMTIGER, www.chessworld.net 2007

11.f4 Ne7



White's pawns begin to roll, and Black's pieces scramble to get out of the way. The second player has a material and development advantage -- but the clock is ticking!

12.f5 Bd7 13.Qb3+ d5 14.Nc3 c6 15.Bg5 h6


Double-edged play: it will weaken Black's Kingside, but he plans on using the "holes" as open lines for counter-attack.

16.Bxf6 gxf6 17.Ne2 Qc7 18.Nf4 Rg8 19.Qc3 Rg4 20.Nh5 Qe5




21.d4

Bluff? Black doesn't want to find out. You have to make split-second decisions in 5-minute games.

21...Qc7 22.e5 Rag8





23.e6+ Bxe6 24.fxe6+ Kxe6 25.Rae1+




25...Kd6
The King was "safer" at f7, but things are very difficult even then.

26.Rxf6+

Good enough, although 26.Qc5+ 13.Kd7 27.Rxe7+ was even stronger.

26...Kd7 27.g3 Black disconnected.
I don't know about at ICC, but at FICS if someone disconnected here, the game would be awarded to White.
Exciting chess!