Endgame
Bobby Fischer's Remarkable Rise and Fall – from America's Brightest Prodigy to the Edge of Madness
Frank Brady
Crown Publishers (2011)
Frank Brady (who authored an earlier biography of Fischer, Profile of a Prodigy) knew Bobby Fischer. For Endgame he interviewed many people who knew the Champion – on his way up, from a young boy who suddenly "got good" at chess, aiming to be the top player in the world; through his titanic battles to become primus inter pares (and a whole lot more); to his sad and lonely last days as a pariah of the chess world, a man without a country, a caricature of his former self.
Brady's extensive research (including KGB and FBI files, and even an autobiographical essay that Fischer wrote as a teenager) allows him to paint a very human picture of his subject, one that is accessible to any reader, not just those infected with the chess bug. This is one of Endgame's strengths: Robert J. Fischer's caissiac wizardry may have unnerved his opponents, and tales of his domination on the 64 squares may have frightened non-players ("I can't even tell the horsie from the castle") away from learning about the American gladiator – but, no more.
With his efforts, the author sweeps away a number of outrageous notions that have held sway in the public's mind.
Was Bobby and idiot savant ? Hardly. Although he was intensely involved in chess, his interests also included religion and history (among other things) and he read widely, especially as an adult. He could hold his end of a conversation quite well. (If you need a fancy description, try auto didact. A high school dropout, Fischer, nonetheless, never stopped learning.)
Was Bobby autistic ? Clearly, he could be a bit unpolished in his social and communication skills, but once you side-step the jokes about chess-playing itself as "restricted and repetitive behavior" (one of the diagnostic criteria of autism) it is difficult to look at all of the relationships that he had (with Boris Spassky, as one high profile example) which included plenty of interpersonal warmth (often, heat) and reciprocity, and come up with that label.
Was Bobby schizophrenic ? That is a word much easier tossed around by lay people than applied by a professional after an evaluation. Brady quotes at least one clinician who knew Bobby who did not think so. There are several untrained acquaintances who assuredly say he was. (Certainly his life included a brand of social and occupational dysfunction, but the matter of a disintegration of thought processes is still quite dicey.)
Was Bobby paranoid ? Aha: here is where the old saying "you're not paranoid if they are out to get you" gets an extra workout. As he moved into international chess play as a teenager, Fischer was not initially as successful as he had expected and predicted. His explanation? The "Russians" were conspiring against him. Taken by many at the time as an attitude of "sour grapes", these claims were subsequently assessed by fair-minded observers – to be true.
Yet, sadly, we see in Endgame, as Bobby moved through his teens and twenties and thirties, his feelings of persecution and his world view of so many people out to get him steadfastly out-paced anything that was actually happening in the world around him. Like a summer storm that starts with intermittent rain drops, follows with an increasingly persistent shower, and finishes with a drenching downpour, Bobby's paranoia eventually drowned him.
It is easy to see Fischer through the lens of a mythical hero, a demi-god steadfastly conquering adversity and eventually attaining his life-long goal of becoming World Champion. What happens next can be filed under " once you reach the pinnacle, it's a long, long way down from the top of Mount Olympus".
What Brady does in Endgame is different, however. He humanizes Bobby, making him pretty much the boy next door. Readers, like the neighbors, can get excited as they watch the kid pile on success after success. Go, Bobby!
And, tragically, like the neighbors who always seem to be interviewed by the press after someone they know has done something horrible, we all look at Fischer's declining years and say, we don't understand, sure he was a bit quirky, but he was always kind of a nice kid, we never would have expected this...
Frank Brady's Endgame: fine reading for anyone.
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ ...and related lines
(risky/nonrisky lines, tactics & psychology for fast, exciting play)
Showing posts with label endgame. Show all posts
Showing posts with label endgame. Show all posts
Sunday, June 26, 2011
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Endgame Skillz
Having spent time preparing the posts "To belabor a point..." and "Reeling Sequel", you would think that I (with the White pieces) would have been ready for the following endgame position:
Something "neutral" like 34.g3 g6 35.f4 gxf4 36.gxf4 Rf7 would have kept the game in balance and led to the "inevitable" draw.
[analysis diagram]
Something "neutral" like 34.g3 g6 35.f4 gxf4 36.gxf4 Rf7 would have kept the game in balance and led to the "inevitable" draw.
Instead, I moved my f-pawn.
34.f3 Rf4+ 35.Rxf4 gxf4
You don't actually have to be able to see 14 moves ahead to know that this is going to result in an unfortunate, un-draw-able Queen-vs-advanced-f-pawn endgame:
36.Kd4 Kb5 37.Ke4 Kc4 38.Kxf4 c5 39.Ke3 Kxc3 40.g4 c4 41.f4 Kc2 42.f5 c3 43.g5 Kd1 44.f6 gxf6 45.gxf6 c2 46.f7 c1Q+ 47.Ke4 Qc8 48.Ke5 Qf8 49.Kf6 Kd2
With the White pawn blocked, Black marches his King up to help collect it – standard strategy.
50.Ke6 Ke3 51.Kf6 Kf4 52.Kg6 Ke5 White resigned
Only after the game did I realize that there was still a draw after Black's Rook check – provided that I didn't enter the endgame that I thought I "knew". Simply 35.Kd3 Rxg4 36.fxg4 Kd5 was enough to split the point!
Only after the game did I realize that there was still a draw after Black's Rook check – provided that I didn't enter the endgame that I thought I "knew". Simply 35.Kd3 Rxg4 36.fxg4 Kd5 was enough to split the point!
[analysis diagram]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)