Jerome Gambit: Noticing A Tactic

Here we have another 1-minute bullet game from Angel Camiña, who notices a common tactic in the Jerome Gambit - 
the Queen check that also attacks an unprotected minor piece. Black could
have continued in the game, but he would have done so a pawn down.

angelcamina - hpmck
1 0 bullet, lichess.org, 2019

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Nc3 Bc5 5.Bxf7+ 

The Italian Four Knights Jerome Gambit.

5...Kxf7 6.Nxe5+ Nxe5 7.d4 Bxd4 8.Qxd4 d6 

9.O-O Rf8 10.f4 Nc6 11.Qc4+ Be6 12.Qe2 Kg8

13.f5 Bd7 14.Bf4 Nd4 

Black can not resist harassing the Queen.

15.Qc4+ Black resigned

Jerome Gambit: My Opponent Knows What He Is Doing (Part 4)

[continued from previous post]

perrypawnpusher - warwar
"Italian Battleground", Chess.com, 2019

At this point in the game, I was still thinking about moving my King to the center to help advance the pawns, although I couldn't figure out exactly how. In the mean time, my Rook on f8 was designed to keep Black's King away from interfering in the center.

Here, my opponent took several days "vacation" from the site, and I worked on my portable chess set like it was a crystal ball (the time control was 3 days per move). For starters - what was the reasoning behind my opponent's last move? (In hindsight, I can see that he missed a decent drawing line - by returning material - but what was he trying to do with his Bishop on c3?)

38...Bd7

It turns out that my Rook pins down its opposite, and forces Black's light square Bishop to stay on the a4-e8 diagonal, for protection. With that paralysis of pieces, it was possible to see that Black's other Bishop was now going to be stuck on the wrong side of the pawn chain. (It had arrived on the a5-e1 diagonal to forestall b3-b4.)

39.Bc5 

The key. Now my Bishop can escort the pawn through b4, on the way to promotion. My King can stay at home and mark his counterpart, after all.

39.Bc5

The Bishop can reach out and help.

39...Bc6 40.b4 h5 41.b5 Bd7 42.b6 Black resigned

Once again, saved by the "Jerome pawns", but only after some difficult play.

Hats off to warwar for a challenging game. 

Jerome Gambit: My Opponent Knows What He Is Doing (Part 3)

[continued from previous post]

perrypawnpusher - warwar

"Italian Battleground", Chess.com, 2019

I had reached this point in the game, figuring that I probably had a draw, wondering if I could develop more than that.

My first thought was to bring my King to the center to support the advancing pawns.

31.Kg1 Bd4+ 32.Kh1 Bf6 

Okay, that solved two problems for me. Trying to get my King out of the corner would lead to checks by the Bishop - so, maybe that wasn't the best plan after all - and Black's willingness to repeat positions, splitting the point, suggested that maybe my position was better off than I realized. 

33.Bc5

Stopping a check from d4, and drawing a bead on the a7 pawn.

33...axb3 34.axb3 Rb8 

Black targets the base of my pawn chain, but the danger was at the head. This definitely shifted the game in my favor.

35.d6 Re8 

Black cannot afford to play 35...Rxb3, after all, because 36.e7 Rb8 37.d7 and White will promote both pawns, winning a Bishop and a Rook for them.

36.e7

A "blunder", according to the Chess.com post-game analysis. Stockfish 10 agreed, preferring 36.Rxf6+ gxf6 37.d7 Rxe6 38.d8/Q Re1+ 39.Bg1.

36...Bc8 37.Bxa7 Bc3

Here, Black could have returned his extra piece for two pawns and drawing chances: 37...Bxe7 38.Re1 Kf7 39.dxe7 Rxe7 40.Rxe7+ Kxe7 when, despite being down a couple of pawns, the Bishops-of-opposite-colors endgame would give him drawing chances. We both missed this.

38.Rf8 

With 4 connected, passed pawns for the piece, I was pretty sure that I could find a way to win.

[to be continued]

Jerome Gambit: My Opponent Knows What He Is Doing (Part 2)

[continued from previous post]

perrypawnpusher - warwar

"Italian Battleground", Chess.com, 2019

10.O-O Re8 11.d3 Kg8 12.Na4

My dad used the expression "fat, dumb, and happy" to describe someone who was content and clueless. All of that is reflected in my 12th move.

Black has castled-by-hand, he is at least even in development, and he still has his annoying dark squared Bishop. What would be more reasonable for White than to swap his Knight for that Bishop? After all, in many "quiet" Jerome Gambit games, Bill Wall has gone after the "minor exchange", hasn't he?

As the game unfolds, it will be clear that I should have tried the thematic move 12.Bg5.

By the way, the after-game computer analysis from Chess.com passed by this move without comment. It is interesting to note that the computer analysis at lichess.org, looking at the game Chess-for-All - Sveti14, blitz, lichess, 2017 (0-1, 30), had criticized its 12.h3?! as an "inaccuracy", and recommended 12.Na4. (I wish I could blame my move choice on this - but, no.)

12...Bd4

As I mentioned in the previous post, this current game and my Round 3 game against Abhishek29 had started out with the same 8 moves. Curiously, though, I had also tried the Knight-for-Bishop swap in that game, after my opponent had similarly advanced his Bishop to d4 before retreating it to b6: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Kf8 7.Qxe5 d6 8.Qg3 Nf6 9.Nc3 Be6 10.O-O Kf7 11.d3 Rf8 12.Na4 Bd4 (a novelty, according to The Database) 13.c3 Bb6 14.Nxb6 axb6, etc. 


13.c3 Be5

I had expected, as a matter of course, 13...Bb6 14.Nxb6 axb6, again being happy that my opponent had wasted a move advancing his Bishop. I was now even happier that my opponent had trapped his own Bishop.

14.f4 Nh5

An unpleasant surprise - possibly prepared beforehand.

15.Qf3 Nxf4 16.Bxf4 Rf8 

I was not expecting this, either. Clearly, things were getting out of hand. (There was also nothing wrong with the simple 16...Bxf4.)

After some consideration, I decided my best chance was to give up any thought of "attack" and enter an endgame where Black would be objectively better, but, at club level, where my extra pawns would give White chances against the extra piece. 

17.Bg5 Rxf3 18.Bxd8 Rxf1+ 

Sensible and consistent, but he might have tried 18... Rxd3.

19.Rxf1 b5 20.Bxc7 bxa4 

It turns out that Black's dark square Bishop was safe, after all. My Knight was the piece in danger.

21.d4 Bf6 22.Bxd6 Ba6 23.Re1 Re8 

Black's Bishops are scary, but White's pawns should be able to cause some trouble, as well. Things unfold in an orderly manner.

After the game, Stockfish 10 still gave Black an edge, although it preferred 23...Bc4 to the text.

24.b3 Kf7

Moving the King toward the center of action. There was nothing wrong with throwing in 24...axb3 25.axb3, and then choosing 25...Bd3 instead.

25.e5 Bg5 26.c4 Bd2 27.Rf1+ Kg6 28.d5 Be3+ 29.Kh1 Bd4 30.e6 Bf6 

What gives the advantage, the piece or the pawns?

I started to breathe easier when I realized that Black's light square Bishop was blocked in by my pawns, balancing things out. Drawish? I hoped so.

After the game, Stockfish 10 suggested that by this point I had actually gained the advantage. I'm still a bit skeptical. There is no question, however, that in club play, the chances of the pawns have to be better.

[to be continued] 

Jerome Gambit: My Opponent Knows What He Is Doing (Part 1)

While it looks like I am headed for a 3rd place finish (out of 6) in the 3rd round of the "Italian Battleground" tournament at Chess.com, I will at least have some Jerome Gambit tales to tell from the experience.

I have already shared my 3rd round game perrypawnpusher - Abhishek29, "Italian Battleground", Chess.com, 2019 (1-0, 35) - my second win in this tournament against that opponent, having defeated him in in Round 1 - see perrypawnpusher - Abhishek29, "Italian Battleground", Chess.com, 2019 (1-0, 19).

The current game is a rematch with an opponent that I faced in Round 2 - see perrypawnpusher - warwar, "Italian Battleground", Chess.com, 2019 (1-0, 39). I was a bit concerned, the way "real" chessplayers are concerned about "real" chess openings: how much had he learned about the Jerome Gambit in the meantime?

It turned out to be an interesting battle between the "Jerome pawns" and the defender's extra piece, but, most of all, between someone who had prepared the opening and someone who had to improvise in the middlegame and endgame.

perrypawnpusher - warwar
"Italian Battleground", Chess.com, 2019

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ 

When the game was over, the Chess.com site offered to do a quick computer analysis. Not surprisingly, this move was labelled a blunder.

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Kf8 

warwar adopts the Jerome Defense, first suggested by Alonzo Wheeler Jerome in his analysis in an article in the Dubuque Chess Journal of July, 1874. It was first played in Jaeger - Jerome, correspondence, 1880 (1-0, 40).

Interestingly enough, Abhishek29 was playing the same defense against me in the same round, too. My record, at that point, against the line was 25 - 6 - 3, a decent 78% score.

7.Qxe5 d6

As I wrote in the article that I had prepared for Kaissiber (unfortunately, never published)

The defenses 6…Kf8 and 6…Ng6 have had their supporters and detractors, depending on how each evaluated the alternatives – was it better to hold onto a little material and avoid complications, or to enter them confidently, knowing that they would turn the game even more in your favor? 

Jerome (DCJ 7/1874) first suggested 6…Kf8. He followed it with 7.Qxe5 d6 8.Qf4+ Nf6 9.c3 Kf7 10.d4 Bb6 11.e5 dxe5 12.dxe5 Re8 13.0-0 Kg8 14.exf6 Qxf6 15.Qxf6 gxf6 16.Bh6 “and White has a pawn ahead.” (Actually, the game is even; but Jerome missed that earlier his 11.e5 was premature, as after the pawn exchange 12…Qd3 would be crushing – Paul Keiser, personal communication. The alternative 8…Ke8 was seen in 5 games in the Yetman – Farmer 2008 match.) 

As Sorensen (NS 5/1877) did not mention 6…Kf8, it was not touched upon by other writers until Freeborough and Rankin (COAM, 1889) suggested that it led to a safe game for Black, giving the line 7.Qxe5 Qe7 8.Qf5+ Ke8 9.Nc3 d6 10.Qf3 Qf7 (or 10...Nf6!) 11.Qe2 Nh6 (or 11...Ne7 or 11...Nf6) with “a superior position or game” to Black. 

A hundred years after Jerome, Harding, in his Counter Gambits (1974), varied, after 7.Qxe5 d6 8.Qf4+ Nf6 with 9.d3 Kg8 10.Nc3 Qe8 11.Be3 Bb4 12.0-0 Be6 13.Ne2 Qh5 14.Nd4 Bd7 15.c3 Bc5, advantage to Black. His comment in The Italian Game (1977) was that after 7…d6, White was left “without genuine compensation for his piece.” He sagely recommended the 6…Kf8 line as “other lines would allow White to attack the exposed black king or to win back the sacrificed material.”

8.Qg3 

I experimented with Jerome's 8.Qf4+ in perrypawnpusher - Capt. Mandrake, Jerome Gambit 3 thematic tournament, ChessWorld.com, 2008 (1-0, 9) and perrypawnpusher - LeeBradbury, "Italian Game" Thematic, Chess.com, 2012 (1-0, 36).

I also tried 8.Qc3 in perrypawnpusher - Raankh, blitz, FICS, 2009 (0-1, 22).

There is not much difference in the strength between these two moves and the text, or even 8.Qh5, if Stockfish 9 is to be believed.

8...Nf6 9.Nc3 Kf7 

Abhishek29 chose 9...Be6 in our Round 3 game.

Years ago, perrypawnpusher - klixar, blitz, FICS, 2007 (1-0, 33) continued 9...Ng4.

perrypawnpusher - truuf, blitz, FICS, 2011 (0-1, 32) continued with the text move.

[to be continued]

BSJG: Warped Reality

Bullet chess - games played at a 1 minute, no increment, time control - warps reality. It is a challenge to the minds and nerves of those who play it. It doesn't always make sense. 

What to make of the following game? Black is "winning", right up to the point when he is checkmated by his lower-rated opponent.

angelcamina - Skhokho1507
1 0 bullet, lichess.org, 2019

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4 

The Blackburne Shilling Gambit.

4.Bxf7+ 

The Blackburne Shilling Jerome Gambit.

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Ke6 6.Qh5 

White's strongest move here is 6.c3, but any Queen move has to be scary for Black, and takes up thinking time to figure out how to deal with it.

6...Qf6 7.Qe8+ Be7 8.Qh5 

I don't know if White has achieved anything on the board with his Queen moves, but I am sure that he has made progress on his opponent's clock.

Now Black goes after more material - which is fine, as long as he is careful.

8...Nxc2+ 9.Kd1 Nxa1 10.f4 Qxf4 11.Nd3 

11...Qf6 12.Qd5 checkmate

*Ouch*

Jerome Gambit: Outrunning the Predator

There is that old joke about two men walking in a forest, when they are suddenly spotted by a large predator. One of the guys starts to change into his running shoes. "You'll never outrun that beast," says his friend. "I don't have to," says the first guy, "I just have to outrun you."

And so it is with the chess clock, especially at short time controls, such as 1 minute, with no increment, as is the case in the following game. Black not only has to defend against the Jerome Gambit, he has to outrun White when it comes to the predator clock. 


angelcamina - pippol7
1 0 bullet, lichess.org, 2019

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ 

4...Kxf7 5.Nxe5+ Nxe5 6.Qh5+ Ng6 7.Qd5+ Ke8 8.Qxc5 d6 9.Qe3 Qe7 

Black is doing well, so far.

10.Nc3 Nf6 11.O-O Kf7 12.d4 Re8 13.f3 Kg8

14.Qf2 Qf7 15.Bg5 Ne7 16.Rae1 Qg6 

17.Bc1 Nh5 18.f4 Nc6 19.f5 Qf7 20.Qf3 Nf6 21.Bf4 Qc4 

Black is still doing well - but at what cost? The game now becomes a scramble to beat the clock.

22.e5 dxe5 23.dxe5 Nd7 24.f6 g6 25.Bd2 Ncxe5 26.Qd5+ Qxd5 27.Nxd5 Nf7 

The advantage has gone back and forth, but here Black hands his opponent a checkmate in 3 moves. White, however, doesn't need it.

28.Ne7+ Rxe7 29.fxe7 Black lost on time